Hopeless Cases or Just Hard Nuts to Crack? Stories of “Difficult” Foreign Language Learners

• Authors: Katarzyna Nosidlak

Abstracts

EN

In accordance with the assumptions of the sociologically grounded labelling theory, an individual’s self-perception and, consequently, their actions, might be influenced by words used to describe them. Also, in the context of education, including the field of foreign language learning, such a process of defining learners in a simplified way, has been proven to have profound consequences of psychological nature. The main purpose of the article is to outline the results of a study in which 37 teachers of English shared the stories of their most “difficult” students. The qualitative analysis of the gathered descriptions allowed the identification of some common features characteristic of, so-called, hopeless cases, among which motivation-related problems are the most often enumerated ones. Additionally, many teachers wrote about their struggles while teaching students with special educational needs. The views expressed by the participants of the study might help understand the way in which opinions about students are formulated as well as point to the need for significant changes to be made in the area of foreign language teacher education and training.

Keywords

EN

difficult/problematic student; foreign language learner; formal labelling; informal labelling; labelling theory; teacher training

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Śląski
• Journal: Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 1-24

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Nosidlak

• Pedagogical University of Cracow

• https://orcid.org/0000000183152525

References

• Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212–225.
• Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press of Glencoe.
• Bernburg, J. G. (2009). Labeling theory. In M. D. Krohn, N. Hendrix, G. P. Hall, & A. J. Lizotte (Eds.), Handbook in crime and deviance (pp. 187–209). Springer.
• Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching. Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640.
• Browne, K. (2005). An introduction to sociology. (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
• Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. C. Scribner’s Sons.
• David, M. & Sutton, C. D. (2004). Social research: The basics. SAGE.
• Dumora, B. (2000). Les intentions d’orientation. Aspects développementaux et psychosociaux [Future intentions: Developmental and psycho-social approaches]. HDR; Laboratoire de Psychologie de l’orientation, CNAM, INETOP.
• Guichard, J., & Dumora, B. (2008). A constructivist approach to ethically grounded vocational development interventions for young people. In J. A. Athanasou & R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 187–208). Springer.
• Haralambos, M., & Heald, R. (1985). Sociology: Themes and perspectives. Bell & Hyman.
• Hargreaves, D. H., Hester, S., & Mellor, F. J. (1975). Deviance in classrooms. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Lauchlan, F., & Boyle, C. (2020). Labelling and inclusive education. In U. Sharma (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore9780190264093-e-1021
• Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. Prentice-Hall.
• Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L. & Kinzler, K. D. (2017). The origins of social categorisation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 556–568.
• Matsueda, R. L. (2014). The natural history of labelling theory in Farrington. In P. David & J. Murray (Eds.), Labelling theory: Empirical tests (pp. 13–44). Trans-action Publishers.
• Nomi, T., & Pong, S.-L. (2010). Self-fulfilling prophecy. In G. Ritzer & J. M. Ryan (Eds.), The concise encyclopedia of sociology (p. 531). Wiley-Blackwell.
• Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 411–451.
• Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3, 16–20.
• Rowe, W.G., & O’Brien, J. (2002). The role of Golem, Pygmalion, and Galatea effects on opportunistic behavior in the classroom. Journal of Management Education, 26(6), 612–628.
• Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press.
• Suchacka, J. (2013). Epidemia dysleksji w dużych miastach [An epidemic of dyslexia in big cities]. Wyborcza.pl, 25 April. Retrieved from: https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,13801495,epidemiadysleksji-w-duzych-miastach.html
• Thompson, K. (2017). Teacher labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy. ReviseSociology, November 1. Retrieved from: https://revisesociology.com/2017/11/01/labelling-self-fulfilling-prophecy-education/
• Triplett, R. A., & Jarjoura, G. R. (1994). Theoretical and empirical specification of a model of informal labeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 241–276.
• van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31261/TAPSLA.12573

Biblioteka Nauki

22446728