Ocena rządowego projektu ustawy o dokumentach publicznych (druk sejmowy nr 2153)

• Authors: Paweł Bachmat , Marek Jaśkowski

Title variants

EN

Evaluation of the government bill on public documents (Sejm’s paper no. 2153)

Abstracts

EN

In the aspect of compatibility with the UE law it has been pointed out that to the extent the project aims to exclude certain categories of prints and documents from the regulation of Directive 2014/24, it may be considered incompatible with this directive. It was recommended to suspend work on the bill until the CJEU delivers its judgment concerning case C-187/16. Furthermore in the aspect of compatibility with the rules of criminal procedure it was considered that the advantage of the proposed normative solution of Article 40 para. 3 is the pragmatic linking of access to evidence with the principles of procedural economy, i.e. the guarantee of access to material evidence is conditioned by the objectives of the criminal proceedings.

Keywords

EN

documents; bill; EU law; public procurement; criminal procedure

PL

Dokumenty; projekt ustawy; prawo UE; zamówienia publiczne; procedura karna

• Publisher: Kancelaria Sejmu / Chancellery of the Sejm
• Journal: Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 1(57)
• Pages: 115-130

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Paweł Bachmat

• Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości

author

Marek Jaśkowski

• Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego

References

• Arrowsmith S., The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement, London 2014, s. 503
• Kunicka-Michalska B., Art. 241 KK [w:] A. Wąsek, R. Zawłocki, Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz do artykułów 222–316. Tom II, Warszawa 2010.
• Mozgawa M., Komentarz aktualizowany do art. 241 Kodeksu karnego, LEX
• Stefański R.A, Tajemnica przesłuchania z wyłączeniem jawności, „Prokuratura i Prawo” 2003, Nr 11.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31268/ZPBAS.2018.08

Biblioteka Nauki

2211930