The Question about the Hypertextual Relations in the Book of Genesis Still Open

• Authors: Wojciech Pikor

Abstracts

EN

The article is a critical review of the commentary by Bartosz Adamczewski – Genesis. A Hypertextual Commentary. After presenting the theses put forward by Adamczewski in his commentary on Genesis, the criteria of sequential hypertextuality implemented by Adamczewski and his method of delimiting literary units that remain in hypertextual relations are critically reviewed. The methodological weakness of the hypertextual commentary on Genesis cannot be covered up by the creativity of the commentator.

Keywords

EN

Sequential hypertextuality; the Book of Genesis; the Book of Deuteronomy; Samaria; Pentateuch

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: The Biblical Annals
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 167-180

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Wojciech Pikor

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

• https://orcid.org/000000032656152X

References

• Adamczewski, B., Q or not Q? The So-Called Triple, Double, and Single Traditions in the Synoptic Gospels (Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang 2010).
• Adamczewski, B., Retelling the Law. Genesis, Exodus–Numbers, and Samuel–Kings as Sequential Hypertextual Reworkings of Deuteronomy (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 1; Frankfurt am Main: Lang 2012).
• Adamczewski, B., Deuteronomy–Judges. A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 27; Berlin et al.: Lang 2020).
• Adamczewski, B., Exodus–Numbers. A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 26) (Berlin et al.: Lang 2020).
• Adamczewski, B., Samuel–Kings. A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 28; Berlin et al.: Lang 2021).
• Alonso Schökel, L., Apuntes de hermenéutica (Colección Estructuras y procesos. Serie religión; Madrid: Trotta 1994). Italian edition: L. Alonso Schökel, Appunti di ermeneutica (Studi biblici 24; Bologna: EDB 1994).
• Ausloos, H., The Deuteronomist’s History. The Role of the Deuteronomist in Historical-Critical Research into Genesis–Numbers (Old Testament Studies 67; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2015).
• Barker, J.W., review of B. Adamczewski, The Gospel of Matthew. A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 16; Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang 2017), The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 81 (2019) 327–328.
• Evans, P.S., review of B. Adamczewski, Retelling the Law. Genesis, Exodus–Numbers, and Samuel–Kings as Sequential Hypertextual Reworkings of Deuteronomy (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 1; Frankfurt am Main: Lang 2012), Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 15 (2015) https://jhsonline.org/index.php/jhs/article/view/29441/21580 [access: 16.01.2024].
• Genette, G., Palimpsests. Literature in the Second Degree (trans. C. Newman – C. Doubinsky) (Lincoln, NE – London: University of Nebraska Press 1997).
• Gudme, A.K.d.H., “Was the Temple on Mount Gerizim Modelled after the Jerusalem Temple?,” Religions 11/2 (2020) 73, https://doi.org /10.3390/rel11020073.
• Hensel, B., “Das JHWH-Heiligtum am Garizim. Ein archäologischer Befund und seine literar- und theologiegeschichtliche Einordnung,” Vetus Testamentum 68 (2018) 73–93.
• Hjelm, I., “Samaria, Samaritans and the Composition of the Hebrew Bible,” Samaritans. Past and Present. Current Studies (eds. M. Mor – F.V. Reiterer – W. Winckler) (Berlin – New York: De Gruyter 2010) 91–103.
• Jacobs, S., review of B. Adamczewski, Retelling the Law. Genesis, Exodus–Numbers, and Samuel–Kings as Sequential Hypertextual Reworkings of Deuteronomy (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 1; Frankfurt am Main: Lang 2012), Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 27/5 (2013) 72.
• Kartveit, M., The Origins of the Samaritans (Supplements to Vetus Testamentum 128; Leiden: Brill 2009).
• Kippenberg, H.G., Garizim und Synagoge. Traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur samaritanischen Religion der aramaischen Periode (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 30; Berlin – New York: De Gruyter 1971).
• Knoppers, G., Jews and Samaritans. The Origins and History of Their Early Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).
• Lemański, J., review of B. Adamczewski, Retelling the Law. Genesis, Exodus–Numbers, and Samuel–Kings as Sequential Hypertextual Reworkings of Deuteronomy (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 1; Frankfurt am Main: Lang 2012), The Biblical Annals 3/1 (2013) 203–205.
• Lemański, J., Księga Rodzaju. Rozdziały 11,27–36,43. Wstęp – przekład z oryginału – komentarz (Nowy Komentarz Biblijny. Stary Testament 1/2; Częstochowa: Edycja Świętego Pawła 2013).
• Linke, W., review of B. Adamczewski, Retelling the Law. Genesis, Exodus–Numbers, and Samuel–Kings as Sequential Hypertextual Reworkings of Deuteronomy (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 1; Frankfurt am Main: Lang 2012), Studia Theologica Varsaviensia 52/1 (2014) 199–208.
• Magen, Y., Mount Gerizim Excavations. II. A Temple City ( Jerusalem: Israel Antiquities Authority 2008).
• Majewski, M., Pięcioksiąg odczytany na nowo. Przesłanie autora kapłańskiego (P) i jego wpływ na powstanie Pięcioksięgu (Kraków: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie 2018).
• McLoughlin, M., review of B. Adamczewski, Q or not Q? The So-Called Triple, Double, and Single Traditions in the Synoptic Gospels (Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang 2010), Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 89 (2013) 463–464.
• Mielcarek, K., review of B. Adamczewski, The Gospel of Luke. A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 13; Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang 2016), The Biblical Annals 9/4 (2019) 749–753.
• Mor, M., “The Building of the Samaritan Temple and the Samaritan Governors – Again,” Samaria, Samarians, Samaritans. Studies on Bible, History and Linguistics (ed. J. Zsengellér) (Studia Judaica 66; Studia Samaritana 6; Berlin – Boston, MA: De Gruyter 2011) 89–108.
• Niesiołowski-Spanó, Ł., review of B. Adamczewski, Retelling the Law. Genesis, Exodus–Numbers, and Samuel– Kings as Sequential Hypertextual Reworkings of Deuteronomy (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 1; Frankfurt am Main: Lang 2012), Scripta Biblica et Orientalia 4 (2012) 239–243.
• Nodet, E., Essai sur les origines du judaïsme. De Josué aux Pharisiens (Paris: Cerf 1992). English edition: E. Nodet, A Search for the Origins of Judaism. From Joshua to the Mishnah (trans. J.E. Crowley) ( Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 248; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1997).
• Paschke, B.A., review of B. Adamczewski, Hypertextuality and Historicity in the Gospels (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 3; Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang 2013), Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 15 (2017) 347–349.
• Pikor, W., “Jaki paradygmat życia rodzinnego w narracji o Abrahamie?,” Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia 13 (2020) 105–126.
• Szymik, S., review of B. Adamczewski, Hypertextuality and Historicity in the Gospels (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 3; Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang 2013), The Biblical Annals 4 (2014) 195–202.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/biban.16589

Biblioteka Nauki

43469336