Comparative analysis of American and Russian political discourse: A discourse analysis study

• Authors: Monika Kopik

Abstracts

EN

This article provides an exhaustive analysis of American and Russian political discourse through the examination of the linguistic techniques employed by President Joe Biden and President Putin in their speeches. The aim of this research is to examine the linguistic approaches employed in referencing social and political traditions in the United States and Russia, investigate disparities in linguistic strategies within both political discourses, and assess variations in semantic outcomes. The analysis has been conducted to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the linguistic methods of referring to social and political traditions in America and Russia? (2) Do the linguistic strategies differ depending on the political discourse? (3) Is the semantic output different depending on the political discourse? The findings reveal marked differences between the two discourses, reflecting the social and political discrepancies between the political systems of the United States and Russia.

Keywords

EN

discourse; political discourse; discourse analysis; American political system; Russian political system; comparative analysis

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: Linguistics Beyond and Within
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 9
• Pages: 49-59

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Monika Kopik

• John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

References

• Althusser, L. 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Lenin and philosophy and other essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Blackledge, A. 2005. Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. John Benjamins Publishing.
• Blackledge, A. 2006. The Magical Frontier Between the Dominant and the Dominated: Sociolinguistics and Social Justice in a Multilingual World. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 27(1): 22-41.
• Bleau, R. 2010. Discourse Analysis: A Window into Power Relations in the Psychoanalytic Process. Paper presented at the American Psychoanalytic Association Annual Meeting, University of Glasgow.
• Coupland, N. 2016. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge University Press.
• Crystal, D. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th Edition). Blackwell Publishing.
• Dunmire, P. L. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(11): 735-751.
• Evans, A. B. 2008. Power and Ideology: Vladimir Putin and the Russian Political System. The Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, 1-43.
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Psychology Press.
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
• Fetzer, A., and Lauerbach, G. 2007. Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing.
• Girgus, S. B. 1990. Desire and the Political Unconscious in American Literature. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hudson, R. A. 1996. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
• Jones, C. 1990. The Separated Presidency – Making It Work in Contemporary Politics. In A. King (Ed.), The New American Political System (13-46). American Enterprise Institute.
• King, A. 1990. The New American Political System. American Enterprise Institute.
• Lemke, J. L. 2005. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. Taylor & Francis.
• Lepekhova, M. 2012. National Identity Construction in Russian and American Presidential Speeches Following Tragic Events. In E. Zača (Ed.) National Identity: Time, Place, People. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference for Students at the Faculty of Social Sciences, 52-64. University of Latvia Press.
• Lienesch, M. 2014. New Order of the Ages: Time, the Constitution, and the Making of Modern American Political Thought. Princeton University Press.
• Locke, T. 2004. Critical Discourse Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Lukin, A. 2009. Russia’s New Authoritarianism and the Post-Soviet Political Ideal. Post-soviet Affairs – POST-SOV AFF 25: 66-92. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.24.1.66
• Lupton, D. 1992. Discourse Analysis: A New Methodology for Understanding the Ideologies of Health and Illness. Australian Journal of Public Health 16(2): 145-150.
• Mammadov, A. 2010. Metaphors in the American and Russian Political Discourse. Rask Journal 31: 67-87.
• Muntigl, P. 2002. Contending with Norms: Language and Linguistics in Political Theory and Practice. John Benjamins Publishing
• Nelson, M. 2020. The Presidency, Leadership, and the Public Good. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Office of the President of the Russian Federation. (n.d.). Statements and speeches [Webpage]. Retrieved from http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/69390
• Office of the President of the Russian Federation. (n.d.). Statements and speeches [Webpage]. Retrieved from http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/70565
• Paraschivescu, M. 2012. ‘We the People and God.’ Religion and the Political Discourse in the United States of America. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11(33): 21-38.
• Pirini, J. 2017. Approaches to Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Oxford Bibliographies, [online] https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0183.xml, 12, 2020.
• Powers, P. 2001. The Methodology of Discourse Analysis. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Reichley, J. 2000. The Life of the Parties: A History of American Political Parties. Rowman & Littlefield.
• Roberts, W. R. 2004. Rhetoric. Courier Corporation.
• Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H. E. 2008. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
• Spitzmüller, J. 2014. Discourse Analysis: a Multi-layered Approach. University of Gothenburg.
• Stern, M. B. 1938. America: Paradise or Paradox? Propaganda or Art? The Sewanee Review 46(1): 45-69.
• Surkov, V. 2008. Russian Political Culture: The View from Utopia. Russian Politics & Law 46(5): 10-26. https://doi.org/10.2753/RUP1061-1940460502
• The White House. 2023. State of the Union 2023 [Webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2023.
• V. Yuzhakova, Y., Polyakova, L. S., and Dyorina, N. 2018. Peculiarities of Ethnic Stereotypes Usage in English Political Discourse. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 9 (1): 294-306.
• Van Dijk, T. A. 1997. Discourse as Social Interaction. Sage.
• Van Dijk, T. A. 2002. Political Discourse and Political Cognition. Political Communication 19(2): 205-225.
• Vestermark, I. 2007. Metaphors in Politics: A Study of the Metaphorical Personification of America in Political Discourse (Dissertation). Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-48119
• Waller, M. 2005. Russian Politics Today. Manchester University Press.
• Wilson, J. R. 2001. Political Organizations. Routledge.
• Whisnant, C. 2012. Foucault & Discourse: A Handout for HIS 389. https://webs.wofford.edu/whisnantcj/his389/foucault_discourse.pdf
• Wodak, R. 1989. Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Wright, L. B. 1950. Historical Implications of Optimism in Expanding America. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 94(1): 18-23.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/lingbaw.17015

Biblioteka Nauki

40221009