Detention Pending Execution of the European Arrest Warrant – Dutch and Polish Experience. Some Reflection from the Human Rights Perspective

• Authors: Vincent Glerum , Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek

Abstracts

EN

This article focuses on detention pending surrender, i.e. detention of the requested person in the executing Member State on the basis of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). It defines the scope of application of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights to such detention and analyses the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on time limits of keeping the requested person in detention in the executing MS as well as on the notion of “the executing judicial authority” entitled to decide on detention pending surrender. Both issues are explored with reference to national law and practice of the Netherlands and Poland. The article provides the answer to the question whether national provisions which limit the duration of detention pending surrender properly reflect the normative content of the framework decision on the EAW. The answer to this question is given with due regard to the standard of protection of the requested person stemming from Article 5 § 1 ECHR and Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Furthermore, the analyses focus on Dutch and Polish provisions concerning the authority entitled to decide on detention pending surrender and their compliance with the CJEU’s jurisprudence on the notion of “the executing judicial authority.” Recognising that detention is the basic measure for ensuring the effectiveness of surrender, we try to define the limits of its use in the EAW procedure, stemming from the requirements of protection of human rights.

Keywords

EN

European Arrest Warrant; detention pending surrende; Article 5 ECHR; executing judicial authority

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: Review of European and Comparative Law
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 54
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 89-124

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Vincent Glerum

• University of Groningen

• https://orcid.org/0000000176681939

author

Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek

• The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

• https://orcid.org/0000000197613177

References

• Augustyniak, Barbara. „Komentarz do art. 607n kodeksu postępowania karnego.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, tom II, edited by Dariusz Świecki, 1202. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2022.
• Baran, Bartosz. „Ograniczenia temporalne tymczasowego aresztowania w toku postępowania w przedmiocie wykonania ENA – glosa do postanowienia Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach z 30.06.2010 r.” Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, no. 6 (June 2011): 46–49.
• Bargis, Marta. “Personal Freedom and Surrender.” In Handbook of European Criminal Procedure, edited by Roberto Kostoris, 297–352. Springer, 2018.
• Glerum, Vincent, and Hans Kijlstra. “The Practice in the Netherlands.” In European Arrest Warrant. Practice in Greece, the Netherlands, and Poland, Maastricht Law Series, 23, 93–236. The Hague: Eleven, 2022.
• Glerum, Vincent. “Commentaar op Overleveringswet.” In T&C Internationaal strafrecht, edited by Jannemieke Ouwerkerk, Vincent Glerum, and Lachezar Yanev (Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, 2021; online updated to 1 July 2023).
• Glerum, Vincent. “Dura lex, sed lex? Divergerende nationale rechtspraak, de verplichting tot kaderbesluitconforme uitleg en de eis van een duidelijke en voorzienbare wettelijke grondslag voor vrijheidsbeneming.” SEW 67, no. 12 (December 2019): 562–567.
• Klip, André. European Criminal Law. An Integrative Approach. Cambridge–Antwerp–Chicago: Intersentia, 2021.
• Martufi, Adriano, and Christina Peristeridou. “Pre-trial Detention and EU Law: Collecting Fragments of harmonisation within the Existing Legal Framework.” European Papers 5, no. 3 (December 2020): 1477–1492.
• Miąsik, Dawid, and Monika Szwarc. “Primacy and Direct Effect – Still Together: Popławski II.” Common Market Law Review 58, no. 2 (April 2021): 571–590.
• Sakowicz, Andrzej, and Adam Górski. „Komentarz do art. 607n kodeksu postępowania karnego.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, edited by Andrzej Sakowicz, 1772. Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2023.
• Sakowicz, Andrzej. Opinion on the Draft Law, 34, https://orka.sejm.gov.pl/rex-domk6.nsf/Opdodr?OpenPage&nr=1394.
• Schilling, Theodor. „Europäischer Haftbefehl und europäisches Verfassungsrecht.“ In Probleme des Rahmenbeschlusses am Beispiel des Europäischen Haftbefehls. Ein neues Instrument der europäischen Integration aus Sicht von Europarecht, Strafrecht, Verfassungsrecht und Völkerrecht, edited by Otto Lagodny, Ewald Wiederin, and Roland Winkler, 97–123. Neue Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2007.
• Skorupka, Jerzy. “The Limits of Interference with the Personal Liberty of an Individual and with the Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Criminal Proceedings.” In The Model of Acceptable Interference with the Rights and Freedoms of an Individual in the Criminal Process, edited by Jerzy Skorupka, 493–580. Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2019.
• Steinborn, Sławomir. „Komentarz do art. 607k kodeksu postępowania karnego.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, tom III, edited by Lech Krzysztof Paprzycki, 870–887. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2013.
• Steinborn, Sławomir. „Komentarz do art. 607o kodeksu postępowania karnego.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, tom III, edited by Lech Krzysztof Paprzycki, 904–913. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2013.
• Tak, Peter. “The Dutch Prosecution Service.” In Task and Powers of the Prosecution Services in the EU Member States, edited by Peter Tak, 16–26. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2004.
• Trechsel, Stefan, with the assistance of Sarah J. Summers. Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
• Van der Hulst, Jaap. “Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant in the Netherlands.” Eucrim, no. 2 (June 2014): 64–68.
• Wąsek-Wiaderek, Małgorzata, and Adrian Zbiciak. “The Practice of Poland on the European Arrest Warrant.” In European Arrest Warrant. Practice in Greece, the Netherlands and Poland, Maastricht Law Series 23, 237–321. The Hague: Eleven, 2022.
• Wąsek-Wiaderek, Małgorzata. “»Dual Legal Representation« of a Requested Person in European Arrest Warrant Proceedings – Remarks from the Polish Perspective.” Review of European and Comparative Law 41, no. 2 (June 2020): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.8673.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/recl.16268

Biblioteka Nauki

40451056