Societal implications of smart cities

• Authors: Uroš Pinterič

Title variants

PL

Społeczne implikacje inteligentnych miast

Abstracts

EN

Smart cities are considered to be a relevant concept that bridges the relation between technology and society. It assumes the management reserves in human society that can be exploited by different technological tools, that would be able to learn behavior patterns and adjust different aspects of life accordingly. However, this technologically driven social concept did not take into consideration one of the most important elements of the improved management equation; human, human nature and human behaviour. As well it has little or no regard for the democratic restrictions that are packed in the context of civil and political rights. And it has no interest in the long term effect of the use of smart technology for the development of human skills. In this manner, the article is conceptualized as a critique and discussion of overlooked elements that are reducing the effectiveness of the (smart) technologies on one hand, and on the other hand, they are simultaneously reducing the creative potential of human daily life. Despite the idea of smart societies seems to be beneficial, in general, especially on a macro level, it is considered to be limiting the creative potential of individuals even to the level of their mental deterioration.

PL

Inteligentne miasta są uważane za istotną koncepcję, stanowiącą pomost pomiędzy technologią a społeczeństwem. Przejmuje ona rezerwy zarządzania w społeczeństwie ludzkim, które mogą być wykorzystane przez różne narzędzia technologiczne, mogące uczyć się wzorców zachowań i odpowiednio dostosowywać różne aspekty życia. Jednak ta koncepcja społeczna napędzana technologią nie bierze pod uwagę jednego z najważniejszych elementów równania ulepszonego zarządzania: człowieka, ludzkiej natury i ludzkiego zachowania. W bardzo małym stopniu lub wcale nie uwzględnia ona również demokratycznych ograniczeń, które mieszczą się w kontekście praw obywatelskich i politycznych. Nie interesuje się też długoterminowymi skutkami wykorzystania inteligentnych technologii dla rozwoju ludzkich umiejętności. W ten sposób artykuł przybiera formę krytyki i dyskusji nad przeoczonymi elementami, które z jednej strony obniżają efektywność (inteligentnych) technologii, a z drugiej jednocześnie redukują potencjał twórczy ludzkiej codzienności. Mimo że idea inteligentnych społeczeństw wydaje się być korzystna, to generalnie, zwłaszcza w skali makro, uważa się, że ogranicza ona potencjał twórczy jednostek nawet do poziomu ich degradacji psychicznej.

Keywords

EN

Smart technologies; smart cities; human limitations; knowledge society

PL

Inteligentne technologie; inteligentne miasta; ludzkie ograniczenia; społeczeństwo wiedzy

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: Studia i Analizy Nauk o Polityce
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 125-136

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Uroš Pinterič

• https://orcid.org/0000000150342226

References

• Albino, V., U. Berardi, R.M. Dangelico (2015), Smart cities. Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives, “Journal of Urban Technology” 22(1): 3–21.
• Assembly, U.G. (1948), Universal declaration of human rights, “UN General Assembly” 302(2): 14–25.
• Batty M., K.W. Axhausen, F. Giannotti, A. Pozdnoukhov, A. Bazzani, M. Wachowicz, G. Ouzounis, Y. Portugali (2012). Smart cities of the future, “The European Physical Journal Special Topics” 214(1): 481–518.
• Berghel, H. (2017), Alt-News and Post-Truths in the “Fake News” Era, “Computer” (4): 110–114. de Lange, C. (2015). Welcome to the bionic dawn, New Scientist 227(3032): 24–25.
• Donner, J. (2008). Shrinking fourth world? Mobiles, development, and inclusion, [in:] J.E. Katz (ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies, (Cambridge: MIT Press): –42.
• Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison, (New York: Random House).
• Green, R.M. (1997), Guiding principles of Jewish business ethics, “Business Ethics Quarterly” : 21–30.
• Harold Jr, B. (1997), The protestant ethic. Weber s model and the empirical literature. “Human Relations” 50(7): 757–778.
• Hope, W., R. Johnson (2004), What is an Infomercial?, “Advertising & Society Review, 5(2).
• Ingarden, R. (1975). Remarks concerning the relativity of values. “Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology” 6(2): 102–108.
• Jucevičius, R., I. Patašienė, M. Patašius (2014), Digital dimension of smart city. Critical analysis. “Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences” 156: 146–150.
• Kim, H.M., S. Sabri, A. Kent (2021), Smart cities as a platform for technological and social innovation in productivity, sustainability, and livability. A conceptual framework,
• [in:] Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation, (London-San Diego: Academic Press): 9–28.
• Kirsch, S. (1995), The incredible shrinking world? Technology and the production of space, “Environment and Planning D: Society and Space” 13(5): 529–555.
• Koops, B.J., B.C. Newell, I. Skorvanek (2018), Location Tracking by Police. The Regulation of Tireless and Absolute Surveillance, “UC Irvine Law Review” 9: 635.
• Kuss, D.J., J. Billieux (2017), Technological addictions. Conceptualisation, measurement, etiology and treatment, “Addictive Behaviors” 64: 231–233.
• Lee, A.R., S.M. Son, K.K. Kim (2016), Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue. A stress perspective, “Computers in Human Behavior” 55: 51–61.
• Marvan, T. (2006), Obstacles to the Relativity of Truth, “Organon F” 13(4): 439–450.
• McGuire, M. (2018), Beyond flatland. When smart cities make stupid citizens, “City, Territory and Architecture” 5(1): 1–11.
• Meyer, B., F. Asbrock (2018), Disabled or cyborg? How bionics affect stereotypes toward people with physical disabilities, “Frontiers in Psychology”, 9: 2251.
• Orwell, G. (1949), Nineteen Eighty-Four. A novel, (London: Secker & Warburg).
• Qin, S.M., H. Verkasalo, M. Mohtaschemi, T. Hartonen, M. Alava (2012), Patterns, entropy, and predictability of human mobility and life, “PloS ONE” 7(12): e51353.
• Patel, Y., N. Doshi (2019), Social implications of smart cities, “Procedia Computer Science”, 155: 692–697.
• Roberts, J., L. Yaya, C. Manolis (2014), The invisible addiction. Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students, “Journal of Behavioral Addictions” (4): 254–265.
• Robinson, W.I. (2019), Accumulation crisis and global police state, “Critical Sociology” 45(6): 845–858.
• Roblek, V., M. Mesko, V. Dimovski, J. Peterlin (2019), Smart technologies as social innovation and complex social issues of the Z generation, “Kybernetes” 48: 91–107.
• Samuel, I.J. (2008), Warrantless location tracking, “New York University Law Review” 83: 1324.
• Sandvik, K.B. (2016), The humanitarian cyberspace. Shrinking space or an expanding frontier?, “Third World Quarterly” 37(1): 17–32.
• Sinatra, R., M. Szell (2014), Entropy and the predictability of online life, “Entropy” 16(1): 543–556.
• Thussu, D.K. (2007), News as entertainment. The rise of global infotainment, (Thousand Oaks-Los Angeles-London: Sage).
• Thweatt-Bates, J. (2016), Cyborg selves. A theological anthropology of the posthuman, (London: Routledge).
• Vassileva, R. (2020), Bulgaria. COVID-19 as an excuse to solidify autocracy?, Verfassungsblog, https://verfassungsblog.de/bulgaria-covid-19-as-an-excuse-to-solidify- autocracy/ (access: 30.08.2021).
• Vitale, A.S. (2005), From negotiated management to command and control. How the New York Police Department polices protests, “Policing and Society” 15(3): 283–304.
• Zayas, V.A., M.A. Bouhaben (2021), Pandemic/Screen. The visual motif of police violence in public spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic, “Communication & Society” 34(2): 297–313.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/sanp.12729

Biblioteka Nauki

1945140