Catholic Social Teaching as a Source of Enrichment of the Moral Dimension of Social Enterprise Management

• Authors: Adam Zadroga

Abstracts

EN

Social enterprises perceive social and environmental issues as primary objectives of their hybrid socio-economic activities. They believe that financial stability is a prerequisite, not a goal. This approach is similar to Catholic social teaching (CST). The detailed content of the social encyclicals is a valuable means of deeper exploration and enrichment of the moral dimension of social enterprise management. The following article analyses social entrepreneurship from the point of view of the fundamental principles of CST and theological premises. The reference to the management of a social enterprise of the supreme personalistic standard and principles such as the common good, subsidiarity, and solidarity allows the moral dimension of this process to be understood more deeply. The paper was created based on a method appropriate to research focused on moral theology and CST. First, the content of selected literature on the subject (social entrepreneurship) and carefully selected theological-moral sources (especially papal documents and publications by CST researchers) were analysed. Subsequently, the results of the analysis were subjected to inference and conceptual work in relation to the adopted general research objective and specific research tasks: the phenomenon of social enterprises was described; the specific features and limitations of the social enterprise management process were identified; the fundamental principles of Catholic social teaching as normative criteria for social enterprise management were reviewed; the possibility of applying the aforementioned CST principles to social enterprise practice was discussed and presented, and the final conclusions were formulated.

Keywords

PL

Catholic social teaching; management; principles of social life; social enterprise; social entrepreneurship

EN

Catholic social teaching; management; principles of social life; social enterprise; social entrepreneurship

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: Verbum Vitae
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 40
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 989-1006

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Adam Zadroga

• The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

• https://orcid.org/0000000217069106

References

• Bacq, S. − Janssen, F., “The Multiple Faces of Social Entrepreneurship: A Review of Definitional Issues on Geographical and Thematic Criteria,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23/5–6 (2011) 373–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242.
• Balser, D. − McClusky, J., “Managing Stakeholder Relationships and Nonprofit Organization Effectiveness,” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 15/3 (2005) 295–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70.
• Benedict XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (2009) (= CV).
• Brzuska, E. – Kukulak-Dolata, I. – Nyk, M., Ekonomia społeczna. Teoria i praktyka przedsiębiorczości społecznej (Warszawa: Difin 2017).
• Chell, E. et al., “Social Entrepreneurship and Business Ethics: Does Social Equal Ethical?,” Journal of Business Ethics 133/4 (2016) 619–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2439-6.
• Choi, N. − Majumdar, S., “Social Entrepreneurship as an Essentially Contested Concept: Opening a New Avenue for Systematic Future Research,” Journal of Business Venturing 29/3 (2014) 363–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001.
• Ciepielewska-Kowalik et al., Social Enterprise in Poland. Institutional and Historical Context (ICSEM Working Papers 11; Liege: ICSEM 2015).
• Clark, C. − Brennan, L., “Entrepreneurship with Social Value: A Conceptual Model for Performance Measurement,” Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal 18/2 (2012) 17−40.
• Defourny, J. – Nyssens, M., “Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences,” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1/1 (2010) 32–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053.
• Defourny, J. – Nyssens, M., “Social Enterprise in Europe: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Third Sector,” Policy and Society 29/3 (2010) 231−242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.07.002.
• Defourny, J. – Nyssens, M., The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective (EMES Working Papers Series 12/03 Liege: EMES European Research Network 2012).
• Derdziuk, A., “The Integrating Function of Virtue,” Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration. Journal for Mental Change 27/1 (2021) 59−79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/pepsi-2021-0003.
• Fiedler, F.E. (ed.), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness (New York: Wiley 1967).
• Frączak, P. − Wygnański, J.J. (eds.), Polski model ekonomii społecznej. Rekomendacje dla rozwoju. Zaproszenie do dyskusji (Warszawa: Fundacja Inicjatyw Społeczno-Ekonomicznych 2008). Available at www.fise.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Polski-model-ekonomii-spolecznej. pdf (access 8.08.2022).
• Gocko, J., “Zasady nauki społecznej Kościoła i wartości podstawowe jako normy moralne życia społecznego. Refleksja na kanwie współczesnych dokumentów społecznych Kościoła,”Roczniki Teologiczne 53/3 (2006) 85−103.
• Grassl, W., “Hybrid Forms of Business: The Logic of Gift in the Commercial World,” Journal of Business Ethics 100 (2011) 109−123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1182-5.
• Grassl, W., “Hybrid Forms of Business: The Logic of Gift in the Commercial World (July 15, 2011),” https://ssrn.com/abstract=1776125 (access 8.08.2022). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.1776125.
• Kerlin, J.A., “Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences,” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 17/3 (2006) 247−263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2.
• Hota, P.K. – Subramanian, B. – Narayanamurthy, G., “Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis,” Journal of Business Ethics 166 (2020) 89–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4.
• John XXIII, Encyclical Letter Mater et Magistra (1961) (= MM).
• John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1991) (= CA).
• John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (1987) (= SRS).
• John Paul II, “L’incontro con i lavoratori, con gli imprenditori e con i dirigenti della provincia mantovana – Mantova (23 Giugno 1991),” Insegnamenti 14/1 (1991) 1770.
• John Paul II, “L’incontro con i rappresentanti del mondo del lavoro – Barcellona (Spagna) (7 Novembre 1982),” Insegnamenti 5/3 (1982) 1203.
• Leo XIII, Encyclical Letter Rerum Novarum (1891).
• Marek, A. − Jabłoński, A., “Care of the Common Good as a Responsibility of Business Leaders. Catholic Social Teaching Perspective,” Religions 12 (2021) 125.
• Martin, R. − Osberg, S., “Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition,” Stanford Social Innovation Review 5/2 (2007) 29–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48558/TSAV-FG11.
• McVea, J.F. − Naughton, M.J., “Enriching Social Entrepreneurship from the Perspective of Catholic Social Teaching,” Religions 12/3 (2021) 173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12030173.
• Miller, T.L. − Wesley, C.L. − Williams, D.E., “Educating the Minds of Caring Hearts: Comparing the Views of Practitioners and Educators on the Importance of Social Entrepreneurship Competencies,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11/3 (2012) 349−370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0017.
• Nicholls, A., “Playing the Field: A New Approach to the Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship,” Social Enterprise Journal 2/1 (2006) 1–5.
• Nur Suriaty Daud@Fhiri et al., “The Discussion of Social Entrepreneurship: Review of the Literature,” MATEC Web of Conferences 150 (2018) 05095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005095.
• Pastor, M. − Benner, C., Solidarity Economics. Why Mutuality and Movements Matter (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press 2021).
• Pius XI, Encyclical Letter Quadragesimo Anno (1931) (= QA).
• Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of The Church (Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana 2004) www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html (access 8.08.2022).
• Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Vocation of the Business Leader (4 ed.; 2014) www.iustitiaetpax.va/content/dam/giustiziaepace/VBL/Vocation_ENGLISH_4th%20edition.pdf (access 8.08.2022).
• Sobocka-Szczapa, H., Ekonomia społeczna w Polsce (Łódź: Społeczna Wyższa Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania 2010).
• Starnawska, M., “Przedsiębiorczość społeczna w społeczeństwie obywatelskim w Polsce,” Studia BAS 44 (2015) 167–203.
• Vroom, V.H. − Yetton, P.W. (eds.), Leadership and Decision-Making (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press 1973).
• Wronka-Pośpiech, M., “Kulturowe uwarunkowania zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem społecznym,”
• Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 336 (2017) 90−102.
• Wronka-Pośpiech, M. − Frączkiewicz-Wronka, A. − Dobrowolska, M., “Osobowościowe wyznaczniki pracy, wpływające na sukces przedsiębiorców społecznych,” Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi 118 (2017) 105−122.
• Yujuico, E., “Connecting the Dots in Social Entrepreneurship Through the Capabilities Approach,”Socio-Economic Review 6/3 (2008) 493–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn003.
• Zadroga, A., “Professional Ethics of Social Entrepreneurs: The Perspective of Christian Personalist Ethics,” Verbum Vitae 39/2 (2021) 495−513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.11462.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/vv.14380

Biblioteka Nauki

2158360