PL EN


2016 | 4(12) | 13-35
Article title

Unfinished democracy: transitional justice in Taiwan

Content
Title variants
PL
Niedokończona demokracja: przejściowa sprawiedliwość na Tajwanie
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The article attempts to describe Taiwan's progress and a difficult position in practicing transitional justice during its democratic process. The first section reviews Taiwan's democratic progress and the impact on the implementation of transitional justice caused by a regime transition type. The second section describes Taiwan's authoritarian rule period, from February 28 Incident to the White Terror's political types of political cases. The third section analyses the reasons for Taiwan's unfinished transitional justice. The article claims that during Taiwan's political engineering of transitional justice, compensation for the victims was almost the only act of it and at the same time lacking legal or moral prosecution of the inflictors and the truth discovery. Taiwan has never had an opportunity to reflect on the damage caused by the system of the authoritarian rule, so that many inflictors or cooperators of the system have continued to serve in the democratized government in key positions, which has resulted in the prevailing phenomenon of impunity. Such a handling mode to compensate the victims, not willing to investigate the inflictors and seeking the historical truth, cannot solve the crime left by the authoritarian era alone, but it can also bring about a serious crisis of democratic governance in Taiwan.
PL
W artykule podjęto próbę opisania postępów Tajwanu i trudnej pozycji w praktykowaniu sprawiedliwości okresu przejściowego podczas jej demokratycznego procesu. W pierwszej części przedstawiono demokratyczne postępy Tajwanu i wpływ na wdrażanie sprawiedliwości okresu przejściowego spowodowanej przez rodzaj reżimu reżimowego. Druga część opisuje okres rządów autorytarnych Tajwanu, od 28 lutego Incydent do politycznych rodzajów politycznych spraw Białego Terroru. Trzecia sekcja analizuje powody niedokończonej przejściowej sprawiedliwości Tajwanu. Artykuł twierdzi, że podczas tajwańskiej inżynierii politycznej sprawiedliwości okresu przejściowego odszkodowanie dla ofiar było prawie jedynym aktem, a jednocześnie brakiem prawnych lub moralnych oskarżeń o napastników i odkrycie prawdy. Tajwan nigdy nie miał okazji do refleksji na temat szkód wyrządzonych przez system rządów autorytarnych, tak że wielu inflictors lub współpracownikami systemu nadal służyć w demokratyzacji rządu w kluczowych pozycjach, co spowodowało w panującym zjawiska bezkarności . Taki tryb manipulacja aby zrekompensować ofiary, bo nie chce, aby zbadać inflictors i poszukiwania prawdy historycznej, nie może rozwiązać przestępstwa pozostawioną przez samych czasach autorytarnych, ale może również doprowadzić do poważnego kryzysu demokratycznych rządów na Tajwanie.
Year
Issue
Pages
13-35
Physical description
Contributors
  • Soochow University (Taiwan)
author
  • Soochow University (Taiwan)
References
  • Chang Yen-hsien, Chen Feng-hua [2000], Crying of Han Village: Luku Incident, Culture Affairs Department, Taipei.
  • Chao L., Myers R. H. [1994], The first Chinese Democracy, "Asian Survey", vol. XXXIV, no. 3.
  • Chen Tsui-Lien [2009], Spy Domination and White Terror Atmosphere, Published during the White Terror and Transitional Justice Seminar of the Martial Law Period, May 16, GIS NTU Convention Center, Taipei.
  • Cheng Tun-Jun [1989], Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan, "World Politics", vol. 61, no. 4.
  • Chiu Jung-chu, Hsieh Hsin-ju [2006], Political Analysis of Kaohsiung Incident, Included in Taiwan Human Rights and Political Events Symposium, the compensation foundation on the false trial cases of rebellion and bandit spies during the martial law period, Taipei.
  • Fan Yen-chiu [2009], The Cleaning Up of the Aboriginal Elite: Tang Shou-ren and the Others' Rebellion Case, Published during the White Terror and Transitional Justice Seminar of the Martial Law Period, May 16, GIS NTU Convention Center, Taipei.
  • Hsieh Tsung-min [2007], Talking about the Military Detention Center in Jingmei District, Avanguard Publishing House, Taipei.
  • Hsueh Hua-yuen, Yang Hsiu-ching [2004], Construction and Transformation of Strongman Authoritarian Regime (1949-1992), Published in the collection of theses during the International Symposium on Human Rights and History the National History Institute, Taipei.
  • Huang P. [2001], The Paradox of Taiwan's Human Rights Conditions, presented at the International Conference on National Human Rights Commission: Promoting and Protecting Human Rights, January, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Huntington S. [1991], The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
  • I-Chou Liu [1999], The Development of the Opposition, in: Democratizing in Taiwan, S. Isang, Hung-Mao Tien (eds.), Hong Kong University.
  • Li Hsiao-feng [2001], The Type of Taiwan's Political Cases in the Martial Law Period. Included in the Legal and Historical Research of Political Cases During the Martial Law Period, edited by Ni Tz-hsiu, The compensation foundation on the false trial cases of rebellion and bandit spies during the martial law period, Taipei.
  • Linz J. [1975], Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism, in: Handbook of Political Science Vol 3, Macro-political Theory, Reading, F.I. Greenstein, N.W. Polsby (eds.), Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  • Minow M. L. [1998], Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence, Beacon Press.
  • Olsen T. D., Payne L. A., Reiter A. G. [2010], Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy, United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington.
  • Project Plan [2008], project plan of the compensation foundation on the false trial cases of rebellion and bandit spies during the martial law period Analysis of Numbers and Types of Taiwan's Postwar Political Cases (1949-1987), Led by Chiu Jung-chu and co-led by Chang Yenhsien and Tai Pao-tsun, Realization time from September 2008 to June 2009 (Unpublished).
  • Shklar J. [1987], Montesquieu, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Shklar J. N. [1998], The Liberalism of Fear, in: Political Thought & Political Thinkers, S. Hoffmann (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Tien Hung Mao [1989], The Great Transition: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford.
  • UN [2004], UN Security Council's Reports, http://www.un.org/en/sc/documents/sgreports/2004.shtml
  • Wu Jui-jen [2008], National Construction, Internal Colonialism and the Cold War: The Historical Context of the Postwar Taiwan State Violence. Included in the Editorial Team Work of the Way to Human Rights: The Reflection on Taiwan's Democracy and Human Rights, Dr. Chen Wen-chen Memorial Foundation, Taipei.
  • Wu Nai-te [2006], Transitional Justice and Historical Memory: The Unfinished Task of Taiwan's Democratization, "Reflection Quarterly", the second edition, no. 7.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_33119_KSzPP_2016_4_1
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.