Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 15 | 225-234

Article title

A Warfare Metaphor and its Functional Aims in an Actual Armed Conflict – the Forty-Four Day War

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
The present case study in general and the multimodal analysis of the warfare metaphor in particular tend to focus on the prevalence of metaphor framing related to news schemas documented over the period of the forty-four days of an actual war - the 2020 Nagorno-Karabagh war. Certain questions (Why was the warfare metaphor so widely used in this forty-four day war? How and in what ways did this type of metaphor realize its functional aims?) are addressed in the present case study by analyzing theoretical and empirical data on the subject and by advancing my own account of the functions of the warfare metaphor in war discourse presented in mass-mediated communication. Metaphor framing and its effects usually depend on words (the linguistic or verbal metaphor), however, such effect also depend on multimodal representations of the verbal metaphor, namely on the visual image. I therefore argue that metaphor framing and metaphor effects should be examined and explicitly described within the frames of multimodal analysis which can disclose how the convergence of verbal and the visual metaphor affects rhetorical war situations and increases the audience’s reception of the message of the war. Hence, this case study will show that the wartime metaphor, with the application of multimodality, conveys information of the war and impacts public opinion, thus striving to achieve positive outcomes. The results show that metaphor framing and the given type of metaphor is encountered in actual war to draw and capture public attention through emotionally charged multimodal devices aimed at informing and impacting public opinion, thus persuading and motivating the world to take urgent steps to stop the further escalation of the conflict. The usage of such metaphor framing closely connected with the context of war might result in certain outcomes illuminating that the warfare metaphor contributes to the understanding of complexities and abstractions of war discourse at large.

Year

Issue

15

Pages

225-234

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Yerevan State University, Armenia, Department of English Philology

References

  • Beyerchen, Alan (1992/93) “Clausewitz, Nonlinearity, and the Unpredictability of War.” [In:] International Security. Volume 17/3. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 59–90.
  • Bezemer, Jeff, Gunther Kress (2008). “Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning”. [In:] Written Communication. Vol. 25/2; 166–195.
  • Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn, Gerard Steen (2017) “The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review.” [In:] Metaphor and Symbol. Volume 32/2; 118–134.
  • Bougher, Lori D. (2012) “The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition.” [In:] Political Psychology. Volume 33/1; 145–163.
  • Brugman, Britta C., Christian Burgers, Barbara Vis (2019) “Metaphorical Framing in Political Discourse Through Words vs. Concepts: A Meta-Analysis.” [In:] Language and Cognition. Volume 11/1; 41–65.
  • Carpentier, Nico, Beybin D. Kejanlioglu (2020) “The Militarization of a Public Debate: A Discourse-Theoretica Analysis of the Construction of War and Peace in Public Debates Surrounding the Books of Thre Turkish Military Commanders on the 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation.” [In:] Revista de Comunicação
  • Dialógica. Volume 3. Brussel: VUB; 107–139.
  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2005) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave-MacMillan.
  • Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, Paul H. Thibodeau (2018) “War Metaphors in Public Discourse.” [In:] Metaphor and Symbol. Vol. 33/1; 1–11.
  • Kress, Gunther., Theo Van Leeuwen (2020) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.
  • Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lutkewitte, Claire (2013) Multimodal Composition: A Critical Sourcebook. Boston, Massachusetts: Bedford.
  • Ottati, Victor, Randall Renstrom, Erika Price (2014) “The Metaphorical Framing Model: Political Communication and Public Opinion.” [In:] Mark Landau, Michael D. Robinson, Brian P. Meier (eds.) The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 179–202.
  • Steen, Gerard (1999) “From Linguistic to Conceptual Metaphor in Five Steps.” [In:] Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., Gerard Steen (eds.) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 56–77. Internet Sources
  • Castro, Seixas E. (2021) “War Metaphors in Political Communication on Covid-19.” [In:] Frontiers in Sociology. Vol. 5; 1–11.
  • Fahey, Jamie (2010) “Let’s Declare War on This Tired Military Metaphors.” [In:] The Guardian. Issue November 22; 1. [At:] https://www.theguardian.com/media/mind-your-language/2010/nov/22/military-metaphors-mind-your-language [date of access: 27 Nov. 2021].
  • Galtung, Johan (2003) “Peace Journalism.” [In:] Media Asia. Vol. 30/3; 177–181.
  • Hodges, Adam (2015) “War Discourse.” [In:] The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction; Volumes 1–6.
  • Karlberg, Michael, Leslie Buell (2002) “Deconstructing the War of All against All.” [In:] Peace and Conflic Studies. Vol. 12/1; 22–39. [At:] http://myweb.facstaff.wwu.edu/karlberg/articles/WarOfAll.pdf [date of access: 8 Oct. 2021].
  • Minority Rights Group International (2018) World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Azerbaijan: Armenians. [At:] https://www.refworld.org/docid/49749d5b32.html [date of access: 23 Jan. 2022].
  • Muradian, Gaiane (2019) “Breaking Communication Stereotypes: The Discourse of Armenian Velvet Revolution.”[In:] British Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science. Volume 30/2; 1–7.
  • O’Halloran, Kay L., Pal Gautam, Jin Minhao (2021) “Multimodal Approach to Analyzing Big Social and News Media Data.” [In:] Discourse, Context & Media. Vol. 40; 2–32.
  • Richards, Trudie and Brent King (2000) “An Alternative to the Fighting Frame in News Reporting.” [In:] Canadian Journal of Communication. Volume 25/4; 479–496. [At:] https://cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=599 [date of access: 25 Nov. 2021].
  • Reisfield, Gary M., George R. Wilson (2004) “Use of Metaphor in the Discourse on Cancer.” [In:] Journal of Clinical Oncology. Volume 22/19; 4024–4027.
  • The Times Square Billboard (2020) [at:] https://www.facebook.com/tigrantsitoghdzyan? [date of access: 7 Jan. 2021].
  • Tsitoghdzyan, Tigran (2020) Your Silence is Killing Us. [At:] https://www.facebook.com/tigrantsitoghdzyan? [date of access: 3 Dec. 2020].
  • Tsitoghdzyan, Tigran. (2020) Your Neutrality is Killing Us. [At:] https://www.facebook.com/TigranTsitoghdzyan [date of access: 7 Feb. 2021].
  • Tsitoghdzyan, Tigran (2020) Your Ignorance of History is Killing Us. [At:] https://www.facebook.com/TigranTsitoghdzyan [date of access: 7 Feb. 2021].
  • Veltkamp, Sara (2021) “War Metaphor – What is it Good for?” [In:] Minerva’s Winter Newsletter; 1–3. [At:] https://www.minervastrategies.com/blog/war-metaphor-what-is-it-good-for/ [date of access: 27 January 2022]. Received: 10.03.2022

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2231695

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_34616_ajmp_2022_15_18
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.