Thematic Roles in Image Schemas. Part 2. A Missing Link from Reality to Mind

• Authors: Aleksander Szwedek

Abstracts

EN

For a long time, Thematic roles have received much attention, raising many disputes and controversies, but they still remain a ‘murky construct’ (Newmeyer, 2010, Rissman and Majid, 2019). Dowty’s words of 1986 that “the perennial vexing problem is the lack of agreement among linguists as to which thematic roles exist, and the absence of any obvious way to decide this question” still hold true. Departing from the traditional ‘intuitive semantic’ approach, I provided evidence that Thematic roles are indispensable components of image schemas, and constitute a scaffolding for language structures (2022, forthcoming). A natural question arose then, where they come from in the image schemas. Fillmore (1968) proposed that they may be, “presumably, innate concepts”, while Langacker (1991) alluded to their “nonlinguistic” origin. The present paper argues that Thematic roles come from “nonlinguistic” sources, i.e., human interpretation and categorization of reality, completing the Thematic roles embodiment process.

Keywords

EN

Thematic roles; image schemas; embodiment; categorization

• Publisher: Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Academic Journal of Modern Philology
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 19
• Pages: 345-359

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Aleksander Szwedek

• https://orcid.org/0000000323911942

References

• Anderson, John M. (1971) The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Beaugrande, Robert de, Wolfgang Dressler (1980) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
• Belletti, Adrianna, Luigi Rizzi (1988) “Psych-Verbs and θ–Theory.” [In:] Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6/3; 291–352.
• Berk, Lynn M. (1999) English Syntax: From Word to Discourse. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Beveridge, Madeleine E. L., Martin J. Pickering (2013) “Perspective Taking in Language: Integrating the Spatial and Action Domains.” [In:] Front. Hum. Neurosci, vol. 7. [At:] https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00577 [date of access: May 5, 2022].
• Blake, Barry, J. (1994) Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blake, Frank R. (1930) “A Semantic Analysis of Case.” [In:] James Taft Hatfield, Werner F. Leopold, Andreas Johannes Friedrich Zieglschmid (eds.) Curme Volume of Linguistic Studies. [Reprint of Language Monograph No. 7. Published by the Linguistic Society of America]; 34–49.
• Böhtlingk, Otto (1887) Pāṇini’s Grammatik / herausgegeben, übersetzt, erläutert und mit verschiedenen indices versehen. Leipzig: Haessel [Reprints: New York 1964, 1971, 1977: Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim].
• Chomsky, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Clausner, Timothy, William Croft (1999) “Domains and Image Schemata.” [In:] Cognitive Linguistics 10; 1–31.
• Coello Yann, Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell (2007) “Embodiment, Spatial Categorisation and Action.” [In:] Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 16/3; 667–683.
• Cohen, Henri, Claire Lefebvre (eds.) Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. (2017). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
• Dowty, David (1986) “Thematic Roles and Semantics.” [In:] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley Linguistic Society; 340–354.
• Dowty, David (1991) “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection.” [In:] Language 67; 547–619.
• EAGLES = Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards; European Commission DG XIII programme. [At:] http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/synlex/node62.html [date of access: 9 June, 2020].
• Fillmore, Charles J. (1968) “The Case for Case.” [In:] Emmon Bach, Robert T. Harms (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1–88.
• Ganeri, Jonardon (2011) Artha: Meaning. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: Jan. 2013. [At:] https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198074137.001.0001/acprof-9780198074137-chapter-3 DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198074137.003.0003.
• Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (2005) “The Psychological Status of Image Schemas.” [In:) Beate Hampe (ed.) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 113–135.
• Grady, Joseph (2005) “Image Schemata and Perception: Refining a Definition. [In:] Beate Hampe (ed.) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemata in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 35–55.
• Grimshaw, Jane B. (1990) Argument Structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Gruber, Jeffrey (1965) Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD dissertation. MIT.
• Hampe, Beate (ed.) (2005) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemata in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Jackendoff, Ray (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Jackendoff, Ray (1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Jackendoff, Ray (1987) “The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 18 (3): 369–411.
• Jackendoff, Ray (1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Jackendoff, Ray (1999) Semantics and Cognition. London, England: MIT Press.
• Johnson, Mark (1987) The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Kahraman, Cengiz, Basar Öztayşi, Sezi Cevik (2016) “Comprehensive Literature Review of 50 Years of Fuzzy Set Theory.” [In:] International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 9 (Sup1): Abstract. [At:] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298208497_A_Comprehensive_Literature_Review_of_50_Years_of_Fuzzy_Set_Theory). DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2016.1180817
• Kasper, Simon (2008) A Comparison of ‘Thematic role’ Theories. Magister-Hausarbeit. Fachbereich Germanistik und Kunstwissenschaften der Philipps-Marburg: Universität Marburg. [At:] https://www.academia.edu/9185151/A_comparison_of_Thematic_role_theories [date of access: May 10, 2020].
• Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. (2016) The Translation Equivalence Delusion. Meaning and Translation. Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang.
• Labov, William (1973) “The Boundaries of Words and Their Meanings.” [In:] Charles-James N. Bailey, Roger W. Shuy (eds.) New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington: Georgetown University Press; 340–371.
• Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Lakoff, George, Mark Turner (1989) More Than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Langacker, Ronald W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• Langacker, Ronald W. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• Langacker, Ronald W. (1993) “Reference-Point Constructions.” [In”] Cognitive Linguistics 4; 1–38.
• Mandler, Jean M., Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas (2014) “On Defining Image Schemas.” [In:] Language and Cognition, vol. 6; 510–532.
• Mora Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo (2001) “Directed Motion in English and Spanish.” [In:] Estudios de Lingüística del Español, vol. 11; ISSN: 1139–8736.
• Neisser, Ulric (1976) Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. New York: WH Freeman and Company.
• Newmeyer, Frederic (2010) “On Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories: A Reply to Haspelmath.” [In:] Language 86 (3); 688–695.
• Palmer, Frank R. (1994) Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: University Press.
• Payne, Thomas E. (2007) “Summary of Semantic Roles and Grammatical Relations.” (19 October 2007). [At:] https://pages.uoregon.edu/tpayne/EG595/HO-Srs-and-GRs.pdf [date of access 23 May 2023].
• Poirier Pierre, Benoit Hardy-Vallée, Jean-Frédéric DePasquale (2017) “Embodied Categorization.” [In:] Henri Cohen, Claire Lefebvre (eds.) Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; Chapter 33.
• Pollard, Carl, Ivan A. Sag (1994) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Popova, Yanna (2005) “Image Schemata and Verbal Synaesthesia.” [In:] Beate Hampe (ed.) From Perception to Meaning. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 395–419.
• Rissman, Lilia, Saskia van Putten, Asifa Majid (2022) “Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German.” [In:] Cognitive Science 46; e13140. [At:] https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13140 [date of access: May 23 2023].
• Rissman, Lilia and Asifa Majid. (2019) “Thematic Roles: Core Knowledge or Linguistic Construct?” [In:] Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 26 (6); 1850–1869. [At:] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334335206_Thematic_roles_Core_knowledge or_linguistic_construct [date of access: April 10, 2022].
• Robinson, James H. ([1921] 1965) “On Various Kinds of Thinking.” [In:] Charles Muscatine, Marlene Griffith (eds.) The Borzoi College Reader. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 12–25.
• Rohrer, Tim (2005) "Image Schemata in the Brain." [In:] Beate Hampe (ed.) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 165–193.
• Saeed, John I. (2009) Semantics. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Santorini, Beatrice, Anthony Kroch (2007) The Syntax of Natural Language: An Online Introduction (Ch. 7.) [At:] https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/syntax-textbook [date of access: May 23, 2023].
• Szwedek, Aleksander (2000) “Senses, Perception and Metaphors (of Object and Objectification).” In:] Stanisław Puppel (ed.) Multis vocibus de lingua. Poznań: Wydział Neofilologiczny; 143–153.
• Szwedek, Aleksander (2009) “Conceptualization of Space and Time. [In:] Piotr Łobacz, Piotr Nowak, Władysław Zabrocki (eds.) Language, Science and Culture. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM; 317–333.
• Szwedek, Aleksander (2011) “The Ultimate Source Domain.” [In:] Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:2; 341–366.
• Szwedek, Aleksander (2019) “The Image Schema: A Definition.” [In:] Styles of Communication 11/1; 9–30.
• Szwedek, Aleksander (2022) “Thematic Roles in Image Schemas: A Missing Link Between Mind and Language.” [In:] Cognitive Semantics 8/1: 141–157.
• Szwedek, Aleksander (forthcoming) “The Image Schema.” [In:] Thomas Fuyin Li (ed.) A Handbook of Cognitive Semantics. Brill (Ch. 23).
• Wilson, Robert A., Frank C. Keil (eds.) (1999). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. London, England: The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts.
• Zadeh, Lotfi. A. (1965) “Fuzzy sets.” [In:] Information and Control, vol. 8; 338–353.

Identifiers

DOI

10.34616/ajmp.2023.19.24

Biblioteka Nauki

27322314