“Просторова оптика” урбанізму в українському контексті

• Authors: Ростислав Дмитрович Фанагей

Title variants

EN

Spatial optics of Urbanism in Ukranian Context

Abstracts

EN

The article is dedicated to the actualization of the interdisciplinary spatial perspective as a study of the experience of living-experiencing in the horizon of human history. Despite the fact that increasing attention to the problem of urban space in XX-XXI centuries is caused by intensive industrial and post-industrial urbanization, it's being considered that the city itself has always been the embodiment of social specialization. Now we observe not the formation of a new spatial subject of study, but the "spatialization" of the research perspective. The main trend of modern spatial theory is not just urbanism but its human dimension in sensory fragmentation. According to this, it is assumed that planning and studying of urban space abandon Modern unifying and rational representations of space and re-actualize the rejected sensorial spaces of representation. And although such postmodernization de-differentiation is not neoconservative, in the Ukrainian discourse, these searches for non-repressive solutions are often limited by "rethinking", re-actualization of pre-modern issues – the question of symbols, images, archetypes – or absolutizing of aesthetic-subjectivist perspective.

Keywords

EN

spatial turn; urban space; practices; urbanism; space of representation

UK

просторовий поворот; міський простір; практики; убанізм; простір репрезентації

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski. Wydział Humanistyczny
• Journal: International Journal of Slavic Studies Transgressive, Pragmatic and Speculative Horizons of Popular Literature and Culture
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 85-99

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Ростислав Дмитрович Фанагей

• Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка, Київ (Україна)

References

• Afanas e , Oleksandr, Vas lenko, Ir na. “Naratyv i symvol v tekstualnomu prochytanni mista“. Doksa 2 (2019): 32-41. Dostup 18.10.2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2019.2(32).188630.
• Berleant, Arnold. “Distant Cities: Thoughts on an Aesthetics of Urbanism”. W: Aesthetics beyond the Arts, Arnold Berleant, 105-115. Farnham, UK & Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012, 108.
• Druzh n na, Yul a. “Vyrobnytstvo spilnykh prostoriv yak prysvoiennia miskoho seredovyshcha: pereosmyslennia dosvidu budynkiv kultury“. Doksa 2 (2019): 170-179. Dostup 18.10.2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2019.2(32).188622.
• Foucalt, Michel. Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison, trans. Alan Sheridan. New-York, Pantheon Book, 1978.
• Foucault, Michel. POWER/KNOWLEDGE Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
• Gartman, Devid. “Postmodernizm ili logika kul'tury postfordizma?”. w: Postfordizm: koncepcii, instituty, praktiki, 18-52. Moskva: ROSSPEHN, 2015, 22.
• Gumbrekht, Hans Ul'rikh. Proizvodstvo prisutstviya: chego ne mozhet peredat' znachenie. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006.
• am ner, Tal. “ r z s plan ro an a postford stsk j gorod”. W: Postfordizm: koncepcii, instituty, praktiki, 137-156. Moskva: ROSSPEHN, 2015.
• Kharvi, Devid. “Prostranst o kak kl uche oe slo o”. Topos 1 (2011): 10–38.
• Kozhemiakina, Oksana. “Arkhetyp domu v hlobalno-hlokalnyh komfiguratsiiakh suchasnogo mista“. Doksa 2 (2019): 32-41. Dostup 18.10.2021,
• Landry, Charles. The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London, Sterling: Comedia, 2008.
• Lash, Scott. The Sociology of Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Lefebvre, Henri. Production of space, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell Inc, 1991.
• Lefebvre, Henri. State, space, world : selected essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.
• Lynch, Kevin. Image of the city. Cambridge, London: M.I.T. Press, 1990.
• Mumford, Lewis. The City in History. Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects. New-York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, INC., 1961.
• Mumford, Lewis. The culture of the cities. San Diego/New York: A Harvest/HBJ Book, 1970.
• Sukhodub, Tetiana. “Topos yak predmets i problema filpspfskogo dyscursu“. Doksa 2 (2019): 21-31. Dostup 18.10.2021.
• Tkhorzhevska, Tetiana. “Praktyky Osvoiennia miskoho prostoru: vynaidennia tradytsii?“. Doksa 2 (2019): 129-139. Dostup 18.10.2021.
• Verlen, Benno. “Obshchest o, dejst e prostranst o. Al'ternat na a soc al'na a geograf a”. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie 2 (2001): 26–48.
• Virt, Luis. “Urbanizm kak obraz zhizni”. w: Izbrannye raboty po sociologii: Sb.perevodov, Luis Virt, 93-118. Moskva: INION RAN, 2005.

Identifiers

DOI

10.34768/spgp-gx88

Biblioteka Nauki

2033987