Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 13 | 343-351

Article title

Religious figures in controversial advertisements

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
In the contemporary world, traditional forms of advertising seem to be losing impact. In the advertising clutter, ad makers try to make their advertisements stand out by the implementation of new and attractive strategies. Shockvertising is one of them. This unconventional approach to advertising aims at astonishing its audience by presenting shocking and controversial content. It is based on the assumption that arousing strong emotions will enhance the process of memorising. Additionally, the provocative nature of the message is intended to shock, and thus generate publicity, which in turn increases brand awareness, and consequently influences sales. The main aim of this questionnaire-based research was to verify what kind of feelings and emotions are evoked among recipients of iconoclastic images in advertisements for different products and to check if the audience feels encouraged and convinced by such an appeal. Moreover, in the cultural dimension, the study aimed at assessing the sensitivity to controversial topics including religious concepts. The audience was exposed to images of religious characters combined with profane or taboo topics and asked for opinions. Based on the results, it can be concluded that, from a cultural point of view, the Polish audience demonstrates sensitivity to religious issues. Besides, from a marketing perspective, although shockvertising proves effective in distinguishing the brand, on a conscious level, it fails to influence the actual purchase behaviour.

Year

Issue

13

Pages

343-351

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza

References

  • Belk Russell, Melanie Wallendorf, John Sherry. “The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey”. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1989, 1–38.
  • Dahl Darren, Kristina Frankenberger, Rajesh Manchanda. „Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students”. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(03), 2002, 268–280.
  • Dotson Michael, Hyatt Eva. “Religious symbols as peripheral cues in advertising: a replication of the elaboration likelihood model”. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 2000, 63–68.
  • Gembarowski Marcin. Nowoczesne formy reklamy. Rzeszów, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, 2007.
  • Gineikienė Justina, Ignas Zimaitis, Sigitas Urbonavičius. “»Controversial use of religious symbols in advertising«. Ideas in marketing: finding the new and polishing the old. Developments in marketing science: proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science”. (ed.). Krzysztof Kubacki. Springer, Cham, 2015, 47–50.
  • Grębowiec Mariusz. „Reklamy kontrowersyjne i ich wpływ na podejmowanie decyzji nabywczych przez konsumentów”. Zeszyty Naukowe. Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing, 3(52), 2010, 444–455.
  • Henley Walter Hodges Jr., Melodie Philhours, Sampath Kumar Ranganathan, Alan Bush. “The effects of symbol product relevance and religiosity on consumer perceptions of Christian symbols in advertising”. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31, 2009, 89–103.
  • Hirschman Elizabeth. “Religious differences in cognitions regarding novelty seeking and information transfer”. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 1982, 228–233.
  • Koszembar-Wiklik Małgorzata. „Motywy erotyki, śmierci i przemocy w reklamach – o manipulowaniu emocjami odbiorcy i przesuwaniu granic społecznego tabu”. Journalism Research Review Quarterly, 2, 2015, 65–84.
  • Kowalewska Kinga. “The exploitation of Christian religious motifs in advertising”. In Knapik Aleksandra R., Katarzyna Buczek, Piotr P. Chruszczewski, Richard L. Lanigan, John R. Rickford. (eds.). Ways to Religion. Vol. 1. Wrocław-Washington, D.C.: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Filologicznej we Wrocławiu. 2017, 101- 111.
  • Taylor Valerie, Diane Halstead, Paula Haynes. “Consumer responses to Christian religious symbols in advertising”. Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 2010, 79–92.
  • Ulrich Michael Leo. “Religion: Marketing’s unwitting godparent; a case study of coffee branding and consumer loyalty”. Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2019.
  • Uprety, N. “Shockvertising – method or madness”. Abhinav Journal, 2 (6), 2013, 43–46.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
29519589

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_34864_heteroglossia_issn_2084-1302_nr13_art19
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.