Współzależność przemysłu 4.0 z gospodarką o obiegu zamkniętym: w poszukiwaniu wspólnego obszaru definicyjnego

• Authors: Anna Mirzyńska , Marek Szarucki , Oskar Kosch

Title variants

EN

Interplay between industry 4.0 and circular economy: In search of a common definition area

Abstracts

EN

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the paper is to identify the common area of defining the circular economy and industry 4.0. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The identified research problem is the observation that the factor influencing the success of the process of creating public policies is the common area of communication between its stakeholders. The study was conducted on a set of keywords obtained from databases of indexed scientific journals (Web of Science and Scopus) and the popular business and political medium (Twitter) using the Jaccard similarity index method by years. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article presents the theoreti‑ cal research background, methodology and research tools, and selected results for the analyzed concepts. RESEARCH RESULTS: The results showed that there is a common area of understanding circular economy and industry 4.0 at the level of 245 words (0.57% coverage). The analysis of keywords showed that despite the statistically low result, the connotation of words leaves room for the creation of solutions common to both concepts. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION: The common semantic field for both concepts makes it possible to introduce them into public debate, thus enabling the development of national policies combining the circular economy with industry 4.0 which seems to be the right answer to the social, environmental and economic needs related to the COVID 19 pandemic. Further research should focus in particular on deepening the qualita‑ tive analysis of the public debate. There are also research gaps in the areas of: research on the relationship between scientific publications and Twitter, delay patterns in the occurrence of keywords in both collections, mutual influence of trends, and spatial and temporal analysis of keywords.

PL

CEL NAUKOWY: Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja wspólnego obszaru definiowania gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym i przemysłu 4.0. PROBLEM I METODY BADAWCZE: Zauważonym problemem badawczym jest rozmycie językowe gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym i przemysłu 4.0 oraz braku widocznej w debacie publicznej językowej płaszczyzny wspólnej. Badanie zostało przeprowadzone na zbiorze słów kluczowych pozyskanych z baz indeksowanych czasopism naukowych (Web of Science oraz Scopus) i popularnego medium biznesowego i politycznego (Twitter) za pomocą metody indeksu podobieństwa Jaccarda według lat. PROCES WYWODU: W artykule zaprezentowano teoretyczne podłoże ba‑ dawcze, metodykę i narzędzia badawcze oraz wybrane wyniki dla analizowanych pojęć. WYNIKI ANALIZY NAUKOWEJ: Wyniki wykazały, że istnieje wspólny Analiza słów kluczowych wykazała, że pomimo statystycznie niskiego wyniku ko‑ notacja słów pozostawia przestrzeń do kreacji rozwiązań wspólnych dla obu pojęć. WNIOSKI, INNOWACJE, REKOMENDACJE: Wspólna płaszczyzna semantyczna dla obu pojęć daje możliwość wprowadzenia ich do debaty publicznej, umożliwiając tym samym opracowywanie polityk krajowych łączących gospodarkę o obiegu zamkniętym (GOZ) z przemysłem 4.0, co wydaje się być słuszną odpowiedzią na potrzeby społeczne, środowiskowe i ekonomiczne związane z pandemią COVID 19. Dalsze badania powinny koncentrować się w szczególności na pogłębianiu jakościowej analizy debaty publicznej. Dostrzega się również luki badawcze w obszarach: badań relacji pomiędzy publikacjami naukowymi a Twitterem, wzorców opóźnień występowania słów kluczowych w obu zbiorach, wzajemnego wpływu trendów, analizy słów kluczowych pod względem przestrzennym i czasowym.

Keywords

PL

gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym; przemysł 4.0.; zrównoważony rozwój; znaczenia pojęciowe; bibliometria

EN

circular economy; industry 4.0.; sustainable development; concepts meaning; bibliometrics

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Horyzonty Polityki
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 40
• Pages: 51-65

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Anna Mirzyńska

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

• https://orcid.org/000000015446938X

author

Marek Szarucki

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

• https://orcid.org/0000000161476094

author

Oskar Kosch

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

• https://orcid.org/0000000326971393

References

• Anderl, R. (2014, Oktober, 9). Industrie 4.0 – Advanced Engineering of Smart Products and Smart Production. [Paper presentation]. Technological Innovations in the Product Development. 19th International Seminar on High Technology, Piracicaba, Brasil.
• Andersen, M.S. (2007). An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustainability Science, 2, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6
• Arbeitskreis Industrie 4.0. (2013). Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt. Plattform Industrie 4.0. https://www.acatech.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Abschlussbericht_Industrie4.0_barrierefrei.pdf
• Bauer, W., & Horváth, P. (2015). Industrie 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland. Controlling, 27, 515–517. https://doi.org/10.15358/0935-0381-2015-8-9-515
• Benis, A., Nelke, S.A., & Winoku, M. (2021). Training the Next Industrial Engineers and Managers about Industry 4.0: A Case Study about Challenges and Opportunities in the COVID-19 Era. Sensors (Switzerland), 21(9). doi:10.1109/ICIT45562.2020.9067243
• Boulding, K.E. (2013). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. Environmental Quality A Growing Economy: Essays from the Sixth RFF Forum, 3, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315064147
• Braz, A.C., De Mello, A.M., de Vasconcelos Gomes, L.A., & de Souza Nascimento, P.T. (2018). The bullwhip effect in closed-loop supply chains: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.042
• Carrapico, H., & Farrand, B. (2020). Discursive continuity and change in the time of Covid-19: the case of EU cybersecurity policy. Journal of European Integration, 42(8), 1111–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1853122
• Clube, R.K.M., & Tennant, M. (2020). The Circular Economy and human needs satisfaction: Promising the radical, delivering the familiar. Ecological Economics, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106772
• Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
• de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Jabbour, C.J.C., Foropon, C., & Filho, M.G. (2018). When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017
• EFFRA. (2013). No TitleFactories of the Future: Multi-annual roadmap for the contractual PPP under Horizon 2020. https://www.effra.eu/sites/default/files/factories_of_the_future_2020_roadmap.pdf
• Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., & Hultink, E.J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
• Gupta, J., Bavinck, M., Ros-Tonen, M., Asubonteng, K., Bosch, H., van Ewijk, E., Hordijk, M., Van Leynseele, Y., Lopes Cardozo, M., Miedema, E., Pouw, N., Rammelt, C., Scholtens, J., Vegelin, C., & Verrest, H. (2021). COVID-19, poverty and inclusive development. World Development, 145, 105527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105527
• Hazen, B.T., Skipper, J.B., Ezell, J.D., & Boone, C.A. (2016). Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: A theory-driven research agenda. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 101, 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.030
• Hingle, M., Yoon, D., Fowler, J., Kobourov, S., Schneider, M.L., Falk, D., & Burd, R. (2013). Collection and visualization of dietary behavior and reasons for eating using Twitter. J. Med. Internet Res, 15(125). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2613
• Homrich, A.S., Galvão, G., Abadia, L.G., & Carvalho, M.M. (2018). The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064
• Ji, L., Liu, C., Huang, L., & Huang, G. (2018). The evolution of Resources Conservation and Recycling over the past 30 years: A bibliometric overview. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.005
• Jiménez-Marín, G., Zambrano, R.E., Galiano-Coronil, A., & Ravina-Ripoll, R. (2021). Business and Energy Efficiency in the Age of Industry 4.0: The Hulten, Broweus and Van Dijk Sensory Marketing Model Applied to Spanish Textile Stores during the COVID-19 Crisis. Energies, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071966
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
• Knudsen, M.S., & Kaivo-oja, J. (12.09.2018). Bridging Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy:a new Research Agenda for Finland? Tulevaisuuden Tutkimuskeskuksen Blogi. https://ffrc.wordpress.com/2018/09/12/bridging-industry-4-0-and-circular-economy
• Kotýnková, M. (2016, October, 5–6). Level, Industry 4.0: Europe’s (re)industrialization needs a Global. [Paper presentation]. 16th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences University of Zilina, The Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communication, Departmentof Economics, Zilina, Slovakia.
• Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
• Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042
• Lifset, R., & Graedel, T.E. (2015). Industrial Ecology. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (s. 843–853). Może uda się uzupełnic o miejsce wydania i wydawnictwo? https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.91023-7
• Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K.L., & Bolle, M. (2015). Man and Machine in Industry 4.0. Boston Consulting Group.
• McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Remaking the way we make things: Cradle to cradle. New York: North Point Press.
• Michelini, G., Moraes, R.N., Cunha, R.N., Costa, J.M.H., & Ometto, A.R. (2017). From Linear to Circular Economy: PSS Conducting the Transition. Procedia CIRP, 64, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.012
• Mosconi, F. (2015). The new European industrial policy: Global competitiveness and the manufacturing renaissance. The New European Industrial Policy: Global Competitiveness and the Manufacturing Renaissance. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761756
• Müller, J.M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K.I. (2018). What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability, 10 (1) (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010247
• Nandi, S., Sparkis, J., Hervani, A.A., & Helms, M.M. (2021). Redesigning Supply Chains using Blockchain-Enabled Circular Economy and COVID-19 Experiences. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 10–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.019
• Ning, H., Liu, H., Ma, J., Yang, L.T., & Huang, R. (2016). Cybermatics: Cyber-physical-social-thinking hyperspace based science and technology. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 504–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.07.012
• Rajput, S., & Singh, S. P. (2019). Connecting circular economy and industry 4.0. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.002
• Rüssmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries. The Boston Consulting Group. https://inovasyon.org/images/Haberler/bcgperspectives_Industry40_2015.pdf
• Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A.C., Araújo, M., & Ares, E. (2017). Towards Industry 4.0: an overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 972–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.093
• Schätz, B., Törngren, M., Bensalem, S., Cengarle, M.V., Pfeifer, H., McDermid, J., Passerone, R., & Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (2015). CyPhERS: Cyber-Physical European Roadmap & Strategy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277297010_Cyber-pHysical_European_Roadmap_Strategy_--_Research_Agenda_and_Recommendations_for_Action
• Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2019). The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732
• Schumacher, A., Nemeth, T., & Sihn, W. (2019). Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 79, 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110
• Segerson, K., Pearce, D.W., & Turner, R.K. (2006). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Land Economics, 67 (2), 272–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146419
• Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020
• Su, C., & Urban, F. (2021). Circular economy for clean energy transitions: A new opportunity under the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Energy, 289, 116666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116666
• Todeschini, R., &Alberto, B. (2016). Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research. Wiley-VCH.
• Tseng, M.L., Tan, R.R., Chiu, A.S.F., Chien, C.F., & Kuo, T.C. (2018). Circular economy meets industry 4.0: Can big data drive industrial symbiosis?, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 13, 146–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.028
• Walendowski, J., Kroll, H., & Schnabl, E. (2016). Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016. Thematic Paper 3 – Industry 4.0, Advanced Materials (Nanotechnology). https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation monitor/sites/default/files/report/RIM%20Plus_Industry%204.0%2C%20Advanced%20Materials%20%28Nanotechnology%29_Thematic%20paper.pdf
• Weller, K., Dröge, E., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Citation analysis in twitter: Approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1–12.
• Yuan, Z., Bi, J., & Moriguichi, Y. (2006). The circular economy: A new development strategy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Może uda się uzupełnić strony? https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321

Identifiers

DOI

10.35765/hp.2123

Biblioteka Nauki

2231806