Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 19 | 51 | 43-55

Article title

Entrepreneurial Pedagogy: An Example of Using Student-Developed Case Studies

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The article attempts to explain the benefits that may result from the use of case studies developed by students as a teaching method applied in entrepreneurial pedagogy. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The main research problem concerns the effectiveness of using case studies created by students as a teaching method in entrepreneurial pedagogy. The article provides an overview of selected literature and presents the authors’ experience in applying student-developed case studies. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In the first part of the article, the most important entrepreneurial skills and competences are discussed. Subsequently, the importance of using activating methods is presented, with particular emphasis on the case study. In the second part, the use of the case study developed by students was analyzed and evaluated. Finally, the conclusions and recommendations are presented. RESEARCH RESULTS: The literature analysis indicates the importance of methods that foster students’ active involvement, including case studies, in entrepreneurial pedagogy. The analysis of case studies developed by students showed their strong commitment to the assignment. Students had to gain knowledge of the operation of enterprises and the processes that take place in them.In addition, the task required students to be familiar with methods and tools that support creative thinking and problem-solving skills. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the analysis of literature and student-developed case studies, it seems that the discussed method is an effective teaching method that increases students’ commitment to the assignment and supports the development of entrepreneurial attitudes and skills. Furthermore, this method provides a range of benefits that give the teacher great freedom in choosing the issues and scope of case studies created by students.
EN
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The article attempts to explain the benefits that may result from the use of case studies developed by students as a teaching method applied in entrepreneurial pedagogy. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The main research problem concerns the effectiveness of using case studies created by students as a teaching method in entrepreneurial pedagogy. The article provides an overview of selected literature and presents the authors’ experience in applying student-developed case studies. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In the first part of the article, the most important entrepreneurial skills and competences are discussed. Subsequently, the importance of using activating methods is presented, with particular emphasis on the case study. In the second part, the use of the case study developed by students was analyzed and evaluated. Finally, the conclusions and recommendations are presented. RESEARCH RESULTS: The literature analysis indicates the importance of methods that foster students’ active involvement, including case studies, in entrepreneurial pedagogy. The analysis of case studies developed by students showed their strong commitment to the assignment. Students had to gain knowledge of the operation of enterprises and the processes that take place in them. In addition, the task required students to be familiar with methods and tools that support creative thinking and problem-solving skills. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the analysis of literature and student-developed case studies, it seems that the discussed method is an effective teaching method that increases students’ commitment to the assignment and supports the development of entrepreneurial attitudes and skills. Furthermore, this method provides a range of benefits that give the teacher great freedom in choosing the issues and scope of case studies created by students. The results of the analysis permit concluding that student-developed case studies can be commonly used and allow developing a wide range of students entrepreneurial skills.  

Year

Volume

19

Issue

51

Pages

43-55

Physical description

Dates

published
2020

Contributors

author
  • Zakład Przedsiębiorczości i Komunikacji w Biznesie, Instytut Zarządzania i Systemów Informacyjnych, Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska
  • Zakład Przedsiębiorczości i Komunikacji w Biznesie, Instytut Zarządzania i Systemów Informacyjnych, Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska

References

  • Bacigalupo, M., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). EntreComp: The entrepreneurship competence framework.
  • Barba-Sánchez, V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. (2018). Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.04.001
  • Carrier, C. (2007). Strategies for teaching entrepreneurship: What else beyond lectures, case studies and business plans?. In Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education: Vol. 1. A general perspective (pp. 143–159).
  • Davies, C. H. J. (2002). Student engagement with simulations: A case study. Computers & Education, 39(3), 271–282.
  • Driessen, M. P., & Zwart, P. S. (2002). The role of the entrepreneur in small business success: The entrepreneurship scan. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/480a/0039bcd325f99bb204f70d1ef92b046f0c1b.pdf
  • Epps, A. (2008). Baby you can drive my car. Using primary target customers to develop your marketing communications. University of Wollongong in Dubai Working Paper Series.
  • European Commission. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A road to success: A compilation of evidence on the impact of entrepreneurship education strategies and measures. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/entrepreneurship-education-road-success-0_en
  • European Parliament and the Council. (2008). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (2008/C 111/01).
  • Fayolle, A., Verzat, C., & Wapshott, R. (2016). In quest of legitimacy: The theoretical and methodological foundations of entrepreneurship education research. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 34(7), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616649250
  • Gawel, A. (2012). The case study method in entrepreneurial and managerial education in a knowledge-based economy. In P. Ammerman (Ed.), The case study method in business education: Metoda studium przypadku w edukacji biznesowej (pp. 25–38). Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.
  • Hodzic, S. (2016). Increasing PhD students’ employability by focusing on the academic entrepreneurship. The analysis of the entrepreneurial competences. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 3(2), 347. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-3(2)-2016pp347-387
  • Ismail, V. Y., Zain, E., & Zulihar (2015). The portrait of entrepreneurial competence on student entrepreneurs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.300
  • Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J. A., Lans, T., Chizari, M., & Mulder, M. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education: A study of Iranian students' entrepreneurial intentions and opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 187–209.
  • Kearney, P. (1999). Enterprising ways to teach & learn: Book 1. Enterprise principles. Enterprise Design. Hobart Tasmania Enterprise Design Associates Pty Ltd, ISBN: 958566305
  • Kickul, J., Gundry, L., Mitra, P., & Berçot, L. (2018). Designing with purpose: Advocating innovation, impact, sustainability, and scale in social entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127418772177
  • Küttim, M., Kallaste, M., Venesaar, U., & Kiis, A. (2014). Entrepreneurship education at university level and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.910
  • Laditka, S. B., & Houck, M. M. (2006). Student-developed case studies: An experiential approach for teaching ethics in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0276-3
  • Lahti, R. K. (1999). Identifying and integrating individual level and organizational level core competencies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022906400927
  • Leon, R. (2016). The development of the future European knowledge workers. An academic perspective. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 4, 339–356.
  • Leon, R. D. (2017). Developing entrepreneurial skills. An educational and intercultural perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(2017), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.7341/20171346
  • Li, J., Wu, S., & Wu, L. (2008). The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(4), 752–774. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000810917843
  • Lumpkin, G. T., Hills, G., & Shrader, R. (2004). Opportunity recognition. In Entrepreneurship: The Way Ahead (pp. 73–90). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203356821.pt2
  • Lynch, M., Kamovich, U., Longva, K. K., & Steinert, M. (2019). Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students' reflections on the learning process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.015
  • Moberg, K. (2014). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education: From ABC to PhD. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS).
  • Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
  • OECD. (2015). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
  • Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M., & IJsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54(3), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002
  • Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2016). Entrepreneurship education. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 25(5), 479–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607080656
  • Rasmussen, E. A., & Sørheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.012
  • Ratten, V., & Usmanij, P. (2020). Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction?. The International Journal of Management Education, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100367
  • Ross, J. W., & Wright, L. (2000). Participant‐created case studies in professional training. Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620010309765
  • Wach, K. (2014). Edukacja dla przedsiębiorczości: pomiędzy przedsiębiorczą pedagogiką a edukacją ekonomiczną i biznesową. Horyzonty Wychowania, 13(18), 11–31.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
1197617

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_35765_hw_1892
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.