The Pedagogical Model of Thought and Activity in the Social World of Interaction Rituals - in the thought of Erving Goffman

• Authors: Jarosław Gara

Abstracts

EN

Research objectives (aims) and problem(s): The purpose of the article is to point out the pedagogical implications of selected elements of Erving Goffman’s thought. Research methods: To achieve this goal, the author used the methods of hermeneutic interpretation and existential problematisation. Structure of the article: The topic may be boiled down to the essence of the ethos which underlies authentic pedagogical thought and activity. This issue has been problematised in terms of Erving Goffman’s theory of the presentation of self in everyday life and social interaction rituals. In this context, reference is made to the heuristic semantic potential of the metaphorical figure expressed in the concept of the “schoolboy model” and “schoolboy’s world.” In fact, it symbolises the essence of the ethos of pedagogical thought and activity, which always paves the way to authentically acquiring personal and social competencies – requiring time, effort and self-discipline. On this path, individuals gain genuine respect and recognition in society whilst acquiring the skills needed to fulfil their social roles. In this meaning, the heuristic figure of the “schoolboy model” mainly depicts the authentic, honest effort needed to follow the path that leads to personal and social development by facing the challenges and demands of education with integrity. Therefore, the metaphorical figure of the schoolboy model, referring to the rule of fairness (i.e., evaluating students based on their actual merits and achievements), assumes the validity of facts that can only be produced by means of diligent and honest work. Research findings and their impact on the development of educational sciences: Thus, the subject matter calls for the application of selected categories of Erving Goffman’s work in contemporary pedagogical discourse and its key categories: the subjectivity, autonomy, self-education and self-realisation of the pupil. Conclusions and/or recommendations: The model of pedagogical thought and action inspired by selected aspects of Goffman’s thought can be linked with the ways of understanding pupils’ status which express beliefs about individuals’ ability to create their own social and cultural status through their choices, reflexivity, activity, commitment and subjective agency. Thus, the heuristic figure of Goffman’s schoolboy model exposes the authentic acquisition of subjective competence for personal and social human development.

Keywords

EN

everyday life; thought and activity education; schoolboy model; interaction rituals; reality of facts; philosophy of education; subjective agency

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 1 (25)
• Pages: 169-190

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Jarosław Gara

• The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw

• https://orcid.org/0000000162515972

References

• Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind: The groundbreaking investigation on how we think. The Hogarth Press.
• Bałachowicz, J. (2009). Style działań edukacyjnych nauczycieli klas początkowych. Między uprzedmiotowieniem a podmiotowością [Styles of educational activities of early grade teachers: Between objectification and subjectivity]. Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej TWP.
• Benner, D. (2015). Pedagogika ogólna [General pedagogy] (D. Stępkowski, Trans.). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego. (Original work published 2012)
• Bruner, J. (1999a). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
• Bruner, J. (1999b). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
• Carlin, A. P. (2022). Systematyczna socjologia informacji Ervinga Goffmana. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 71(4), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2022/71.4/3
• Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. The University of Chicago Press.
• DeMeulenaere, E. (2023). Disrupting school rituals. Urban Education, 58(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919838007
• Gara, J. (2021). Initial reflections on man in the COVID-19 pandemic: The reality that is and is not the same reality. Phainomena. Journal of Phenomenology and Hermeneutics 30(116–117), 61–78. DOI:10.32022/PHI30.2021.116-117.4
• Gara, J., & Stepkowski, D. (2024). The form of pedagogical thinking and acting and the experience of the paradoxicality of (self)education. Studies on the Theory of Education, XV(1(46)), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4420
• Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
• Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
• Gourlay, L. (2022). Presence, absence, and alterity: Fire space and Goffman’s selves in postdigital education. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00265-1
• Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
• Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Jacobsen, M. H. (2017). Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order through everyday observations and imaginative metaphors. In M. H. Jacobsen (Ed.), The interactionist imagination studying meaning, situation and micro-social order (pp. 195–232). Springer Nature.
• Karkowska, M. (2011). Socjologia wychowania. Wybrane elementy. Mechanizmy socjalizacji i edukacja szkolna [Sociology of education: Selected elements. Mechanisms of socialization and school education]. Akademia Humanistyczno-Ekonomiczna.
• King, E. W. (1973). The presentation of self in the classroom an application of Erving Goffman’s theories to primary education. Educational Review, 25(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191730250305
• Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (2000). Rozwój jako cel wychowania [Development as a goal of education] (P. Kwieciński & A. Nalaskowski, Trans.). In Z. Kwieciński (Ed.), Alternatywy myślenia o edukacji. Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
• Konersmann, R. (2009). Filozofia kultury. Wprowadzenie [Philosophy of Culture: An introduction] (K. Krzemieniowa, Trans.). Oficyna Naukowa.
• Landgrebe, L. (2016). Foreword. In J. Patočka, The natural world as a philosophical problem (E. Abrams, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
• Mifsud, D. (2018). The presentation of personal and professional selves: A Goffmanesque perspective of student teachers’ identity crises. In D. Mifsud, Professional identities in initial teacher education. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Patočka, J. (1996). Heretical essays in the philosophy of history (E. Kohák, Trans.). Open Court Publishing Company.
• Patočka, J. (2016). The natural world as a philosophical problem (E. Abrams, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
• Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. I). The University of Chicago Press.
• Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974). The structures of the life-world. Heinemann Educational Books.
• Schütz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102818
• Śliwerski, B. (2001). Współczesne teorie i nurty wychowania [Contemporary theories and trends in education]. Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.
• Stępnik, K. (1988). Filozofia metafory [Philosophy of metaphor]. Wydawnictwo Lubelskie.
• Tischner, J. (2002). Myślenie z wnętrza metafory [Thinking from the inside of a metaphor]. In J. Tischner, Myślenie według wartości. Wydawnictwo Znak.
• Tomczyk, N. (2022). Między sceną a kulisami. Sytuacje społeczne w perspektywie nauczycieli przedszkoli niepublicznych w ujęciu teorii Ervinga Goffmana [Between the stage and the backstage: Social situations in the perspective of non-public kindergarten teachers in terms of Erving Goffman’s theory]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio J – Paedagogia-Psychologia, 35(2), 139–154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2022.35.2.139-154
• Vanderstraeten, R. (2004). Emerging mechanisms of educational interaction. Educational Review, 56(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191032000152264

Identifiers

DOI

10.35765/mjse.2024.1325.09

Biblioteka Nauki

44454064