L’italiano e il polacco alla luce dell’opposizione lingue eso- / endo-centriche

• Authors: Maciej Durkiewicz

Title variants

EN

Italian and Polish in the light of the opposition between exo- / endo-centric languages

Abstracts

EN

The article offers the synthesis of a contrastive research on Italian and Polish action verbs. A theoretical-interpretive framework for the proposed analyses is provided by a proposed typology of languages according to which, based on certain differences in lexical distribution observed in Romance and Germanic languages – in particular in Italian and Danish – can be described as either more or less endocentric or more or less exocentric. As it results from the study conducted according to both competence-based and corpus-based methodologies, Italian turns out to be an exocentric language, while Polish leans toward flatter textualizations from the point of view of semantic information distribution in the utterance.

IT

L'articolo offre la sintesi di una ricerca contrastiva sui verbi d’azione italiani e polacchi. Alle analisi proposte fa da cornice teorico-interpretativa una proposta di tipologia delle lingue secondo la quale in base ad alcune differenze di distribuzione lessicale osservate nelle lingue romanze e germaniche, in particolare in italiano e in danese, le lingue possono essere descritte come più o meno endocentriche oppure più o meno esocentriche. In seguito a un esame condotto sia secondo metodologie competence based che quelle corpus based, l’italiano risulta essere una lingue esocentrica, mentre il polacco propende verso testualizzazioni più piatte dal punto di vista della distribuzione dell’informazione sematica nell’enunciato.

Keywords

IT

grammatica contrastiva italiano polacco; tipologia linguistica; lingue eso-/endocentriche; verbi d’azione; IMAGACT

EN

Italian-Polish contrastive grammar; linguistic typology; exo-/endo-centric languages; action verbs; IMAGACT

• Publisher: Ateneum - Szkoła Wyższa w Gdańsku
• Journal: Forum Filologiczne Ateneum
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 81-96

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Maciej Durkiewicz

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

• https://orcid.org/000000027749944X

References

• Bloom, A. H. (1981). The Linguistic Shaping of Thought: a Study in the Impact of Language on Thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Grzegorczykowa, R. (1997), Nowe spojrzenie na kategorię aspektu w perspektywie semantyki kognitywnej. W: R. Grzegorczykowa & Z. Zaron (red.), Semantyczna struktura słownictwa i wypowiedzi (s. 25-38). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
• Herslund, M. (2010). Predicati e sostantivi complessi: complementarità e isomorfia. In: E. Cresti & I. Korzen (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Identity (pp. 1-8). Firenze: Firenze University Press. https://books.fupress.com/catalogue/language-cognition-and-identityextensions-of-the-endocentricexocentric-language-typology/2163
• Herslund, M. (2000). Tipologia grammaticale e tipologia lessicale. In: I. Korzen & C. Marello (Eds.), Argomenti per una linguistica della traduzione, Gli argomenti umani 4 (pp. 11-18). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
• Hoijer, H. (1954). The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. In: H. Hoijer (Eds.), Language in Culture. Conference on the Interrelations of Language and Other Aspects of Culture (pp. 92-105). Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Iacobini, C. (2004). Parasintesi. In: M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 165–188). Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110934410.165
• IMAGACT. http://www.imagact.it/imagact/query/dictionary.seam, accesso (2022, 06, 28).
• Korzen, I. (2005a). Struttura linguistica e schema cognitivo: tipologie a confronto. In: I. Korzen (Eds.), Lingua, cultura e interlingua: l’italiano e le altre lingue (pp. 123-134). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press.
• Korzen, I. (2005b). Lingue endocentriche e lingue esocentriche: lessico, testo e pensiero. In: I. Korzen & P. D’Achille (Eds.), Tipologia linguistica e società (pp. 31-54). Firenze: Franco Cesati.
• Korzen, I. (2007). Mr. Bean e la linguistica testuale. Considerazioni tipologico-comparative sulle lingue romanze e germaniche. In: M. Barbera & E. Corino & C. Onesti (Eds.), Corpora e linguistica in rete (pp. 209-224). Perugia: Gierra Edizioni.
• Kreisberg, A. (1980). Kategorie czasu i aspektu w języku polskim i włoskim. Wrocław – Warszawa – Kraków – Gdańsk: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
• Lee, D. D. (1938). Conceptual Implications of an Indian Language. Philosophy of Science 5(1), 89-102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/184708
• Moneglia, M. & Panunzi, A. (2010). I verbi generali nei corpora di parlato. Un progetto di annotazione semantica cross-linguistica. In: E. Cresti & I. Korzen (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Identity (pp. 27-45). Firenze: Firenze University Press. https://books.fupress.com/catalogue/language-cognition-and-identity-extensions-of-theendocentricexocentric-language-typology/2163
• Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In: J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Squartini, M. (2015). Il verbo. Roma: Carocci.
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In: T. Shopen (Eds.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description III (pp. 57-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Wróbel, H. (2001). Gramatyka języka polskiego. Kraków: „Od nowa”.

Identifiers

DOI

10.36575/2353-2912/1(10)2022.081

Biblioteka Nauki

2196173