Regionalizacja międzynarodowego sądownictwa karnego z perspektywy zasady komplementarności na przykładzie proponowanego Afrykańskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości oraz Praw Człowieka i Ludów

• Authors: Bartłomiej Krzan

Title variants

Regionalizacja międzynarodowego sądownictwa karnego z perspektywy zasady komplementarności na przykładzie proponowanego Afrykańskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości oraz Praw Człowieka i Ludów

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł odnosi się do tendencji regionalizacji międzynarodowego sądownictwa karnego, jak np. planów rozszerzenia jurysdykcji Afrykańskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości oraz Praw Człowieka i Ludów, z perspektywy zasady komplementarności. Opracowanie zmierza do udowodnienia, że tradycyjne rozumienie komplementarności (jako alokacji jurysdykcji pomiędzy Międzynarodowym Trybunałem Karnym a sądami krajowymi) można rozwinąć tak, aby uwzględnić także regionalne trybunały karne – jako szczebel pośredni pomiędzy stałym MTK a sądownictwem krajowym. Ze względu na zachodzące na siebie – choć nie tożsame – zakresy jurysdykcji, można potraktować MTK i trybunał regionalny jako potencjalnych partnerów, a nie konkurentów, w sądzeniu zbrodni międzynarodowych.

EN

The present contribution deals with recent trends of regionalizing international criminal justice, as in the case of the proposed extension of jurisdiction of the African Court of Justice and Human and People’s Rights over international crimes, and examines them against the background of the principle of complementarity, whose classic aim would be to allocate jurisdiction between the International Criminal Court and national courts. It is argued that the traditional understanding of complementarity may be extended to accommodate also regional criminal tribunals. A regional layer of criminal jurisdiction would therefore be introduced between the ICC and national courts. Given the overlapping but not identical scopes of jurisdiction, by the ICC, and the African Court, respectively, it is possible to conceive of them as potential partners working in parallel terms in prosecuting international (and transnational) crimes.

Keywords

PL

regionalizacja; międzynarodowe sądownictwo karne; regionalne trybunały; Protokół z Malabo; Statut rzymski; MTK; zasada komplementarności; regionalisation; international criminal courts; regional criminal jurisdiction; Malabo Protocol; Rome Statute; ICC; principle of complementarity; regionalizacja; międzynarodowe sądownictwo karne; regionalne trybunały; Protokół z Malabo; Statut rzymski; MTK; zasada komplementarności; regionalisation; international criminal courts; regional criminal jurisdiction; Malabo Protocol; Rome Statute; ICC; principle of complementarity

EN

regionalisation; international criminal courts; regional criminal jurisdiction; Malabo Protocol; Rome Statute; ICC; principle of complementarity

• Publisher: Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN / Institute of Legal Studies PAN
• Journal: Studia Prawnicze
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 1 (217)
• Pages: 89-111

Dates

published

2019-06-18

Contributors

author

Bartłomiej Krzan

• Uniwersytet Wrocławski

References

• Abass A., Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa. Rationale, Prospects and Challenges, „European Journal of International Law” 2013, vol. 24.
• Akande D., The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties. Legal Basis and Limits, „Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2003, vol. 1.
• Alter K.J., Delegating to International Courts. Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation, „Law & Contemporary Problems” 2008, vol. 71.
• Boehme F., ‘We Chose Africa’. South Africa and the Regional Politics of Cooperation with the International Criminal Court, „International Journal of Transitional Justice” 2017, vol. 11.
• Burchill R., International Criminal Tribunals at the Regional Level. Lessons from International Human Rights Law, „New Zealand Yearbook of International Law” 2007, vol. 4.
• Burens L., Universal Jurisdiction Meets Complementarity. An Approach towards a Desirable Future Codification of Horizontal Complementarity between the Member States of the International Criminal Court, „Criminal Law Forum” 2016, vol. 27.
• Burke-White W., Proactive complementarity. The International Criminal Court and national courts in the Rome system of international justice, „Harvard International Law Journal” 2008, vol. 49.
• Burke-White W., Regionalization of International Criminal Law Enforcement. A Preliminary Exploration, „Texas International Law Journal” 2003, vol. 38.
• Cała-Wacinkiewicz E., Fragmentacja prawa międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2018.
• Cassese A., The Role of Internationalized Courts and Tribunals in the Fight Against International Criminality [w:] C.P.R. Romano, A. Nollkaemper, J.K. Kleffner (red.), Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals, Oxford 2004.
• Constitutive Act of African Union, UNTS 2158.
• Czapliński W., Universalism, Regionalism and Localism in the Age of Globalization [w:] R.St.J. Macdonald, D.M.J ohnston (red.), Towards World Constitutionalism.
• Decision on the Protocol of the Court of Justice of the African Union, AU Doc. Assembly/AU/Dec.25 (II).
• du Plessis M., ‘Implications of the AU Decision to Give the African Court Jurisdiction Over International Crimes’, „Institute for Security Studies Paper” 2012, No. 235.
• Ebobrah S.T., Towards a Positive Application of Complementarity in the African Human Rights System: Issues of Functions and Relations, „European Journal of International Law” 2011, vol. 22.
• Eboe-Osuji Ch., The ICC and the African Court and the Extended Notion of Complementarity of International Criminal Jurisdictions, „Nigerian Yearbook of International Law” 2017.
• El Zeidy M.M., The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law. Origin, Development and Practice, Hague 2008.
• Elias T.O., Africa and the Development of International Law, Hague 1988.
• Fawcett L., Regionalism. From Concept to Regional Practice [w:] M.J. Aznar, M.E.F ooter (red.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, vol. 4, Oxford-Portland 2012.
• Ford S., The International Criminal Court and Proximity to the Scene of the Crime. Does the Rome Statute Permit All of the ICC’s Trials to Take Place at Local or Regional Chambers, „The John Marshall Law Review” 2010, vol. 43.
• Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.
• Golsong H., Le développement du droit international regional [w:] SFDI, Colloque de Bordeaux, Régionalisme et universalisme dans le droit international contemporain, Paris 1997.
• Hawkins D.G., Lake D.A., Nielson D.L., Tierney M.J., Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge 2006.
• Heller K., Radical Complementarity, „Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2016, vol. 14.
• Holmes J. T., The Principle of Complementarity [w:] R. Lee (red.), The International Criminal Court. The Making of the Rome Statute. Issues, Negotiations, Results, Hague 1999.
• ICC, Office of the Prosecutor, Policy paper on case selection and prioritization, 15 September 2016, https://www.icc-cpi.int/itemsdocuments/20160915_otp-policy_case-selection_eng.pdf.
• Informal expert paper: The principle of complementarity in practice, https://www.icc-cpi.int/RelatedRecords/CR2009_02250.PDF.
• Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community, Hague 2005.
• Jackson M., Regional Complementarity. The Rome Statute and Public International Law, „Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2016, vol. 14.
• Jalloh Ch., Regionalizing International Criminal Law?, „International Criminal Law Review” 2009, vol. 9.
• Jasudowicz T., Normy regionalne w prawie międzynarodowym, Toruń 1983.
• Jenks C.W., Regionalism in International Judicial Organization, „American Journal of International Law” 1943, vol. 37.
• Katzenstein S., In the Shadow of Crisis. The Creation of International Courts in the Twentieth Century, „Harvard International Law Journal” 2014, vol. 55.
• Kießling A., The Uncertain Fate of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The Problematic Merger with the African Court of Justice and the Establishment of an International Criminal Law Section, „German Yearbook of International Law” 2014, vol. 57.
• Knottnerus A.S., de Volder E., International criminal justice and the early formation of an African criminal court [w:] K.M. Clarke, A.S. Knottnerus, E. de Volder (red.), Africa and the ICC. Perceptions of Justice, Cambridge 2016.
• Konwencja w sprawie zapobiegania i karania zbrodni ludobójstwa, uchwalona przez Zgromadzenie Ogólne Narodów Zjednoczonych dnia 9 grudnia 1948 r., Dz.U. 1952 Nr 2, poz. 9.
• Konwencja Wiedeńska o Prawie Traktatów sporządzona w Wiedniu 23 maja 1969 r., Dz.U. 1990 Nr 74, poz. 439.
• Krzan B. , Afrykańska alternatywa dla Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego [w:] B. Kuźniak, M. Ingelevič-Citak (red.), Ius cogens soft law. Dwa bieguny prawa międzynarodowego publicznego, Kraków 2017.
• Krzan B. , Zbieg jurysdykcji trybunałów międzynarodowych [w:] J. Kolasa (red.), Współczesne sądownictwo międzynarodowe. Tom II – Wybrane zagadnienia prawne, Wrocław 2010.
• Law of Treaties, Report by Mr. H. Lauterpacht, Special Rapporteur, UN Doc. A/CN.4/63.
• Manirakiza P., The Case for an African Criminal Court to Prosecute International Crimes Committed in Africa [w:] V.O. Nmehielle (red.), Africa and the future of international criminal justice, Hague 2012.
• Martin M.W., Jürgen B. , The proposed International Criminal Chamber section of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights. A legal analysis. Notes and comments, South „African Yearbook of International Law” 2012, vol. 37.
• Milik P., Komplementarność jurysdykcji Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego i trybunałów hybrydowych, Warszawa 2012.
• Murungu C.B., Towards a Criminal Chamber in the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, „Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2011, vol. 9.
• Odo G., At the Crossroads. Deconstructing the Challenges of International Justice and the Fight against Impunity in Africa [w:] V.O. Nmehielle (red.), Africa and the future of international criminal justice, Hague 2012.
• Oette L., The African Union High-Level Panel on Darfur. A Precedent for Regional Solutions to the Challenges Facing International Criminal Justice? [w:] V.O. Nmehielle (red.), Africa and the future of international criminal justice, Hague 2012.
• Pocar F., The International Proliferation of Criminal Jurisdictions Revisited. Uniting or Fragmenting International Law? [w:] H.P. Hestermeyer (red.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity. Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum, Hague 2011.
• Pocar F., The Proliferation of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals – A Necessity in the Current International Community, „Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2004, vol. 2.
• Prosecutor v. Delalic et al. (Celebici case), ICTY, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, IT-96-21-A, 20.02.2001.
• Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić A/K/A „Dule”, ICTY, Appeals Chamber Decision on the Defence motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 02.10.1995.
• Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, Annex: Statute of the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human and Peoples’ Rights https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/7804-treaty-0045_-_protocol_on_amendments_to_the_protocol_on_the_statute_of_the_african_court_of_justice_and_human_rights_e-compressed.pdf [dostęp 20.08.2018].
• Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/7792-treaty-0035_-_protocol_on_the_statute_of_the_african_court_of_justice_and_human_rights_e.pdf [dostęp 20.08.2018].
• Rau K., Jurisprudential Innovation or Accountability Avoidance? The International Criminal Court and Proposed Expansion of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, „Minnesota Law Review” 2012, vol. 97.
• Rauxloh R.E., Regionalisation of the International Criminal Court, „New Zealand Yearbook of International Law” 2007, vol. 4.
• Rzymski Statut Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego sporządzony w Rzymie dnia 17 lipca 1998 r., Dz.U. 2003 Nr 78, poz. 708.
• Sarooshi D., International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers, Oxford 2007.
• Schabas W.A, Regions, Regionalism and International Criminal Law, „New Zealand Yearbook of International Law” 2007, vol. 4.
• Schabas W.A., The International Criminal Court. A Commentary on the Rome Statute, 2nd ed., Oxford 2016.
• Soma A., L’africanisation du droit international pénal [w:] Société africaine pour le droit international, „L’Afrique et le droit international penal” 2015.
• Ssenyonjo M., Nakitto S., The African Court of Justice and Human and Peoples’ Rights ‘International Criminal Law Section’. Promoting Impunity for African Union Heads of State and Senior State Officials?, „International Criminal Law Review” 2016, vol. 16, No. 1.
• Stahn C., El Zeidy M. (red.), The International Criminal Court and Complementarity. From Theory to Practice, Cambridge 2011.
• Tladi D., The Immunity Provision in the AU Amendment Protocol. Separating the (Doctrinal) Wheat from the (Normative) Chaff, „Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2015, vol. 13.
• Wierczyńska K., Przesłanki dopuszczalności wykonywania jurysdykcji przez Międzynarodowy Trybunał Karny, Studium międzynarodowoprawne, Warszawa 2016.

Identifiers

DOI

10.37232/sp.2019.1.5