The Physical Platonism of Galileo Galilei: Ernst Cassirer’s Interpretation in His Published and Unpublished Writings

• Authors: Giacomo Borbone

Abstracts

EN

The struggle undertaken by Galileo Galilei against Aristotelian physics-and his subsequent defense of Nicolaus Copernicus’s theories-led the Pisan scientist to bring about the so-called modern scientific revolution and to lay the foundations of the experimental method, the fundamental result of which was to deprive the natural world of subjective qualities and to reconfigure it in purely quantitative terms. On the purely historical level, agreement among historians of science and philosophy is almost unanimous, while the same cannot be said for questions concerning interpretations of Galilei’s modus operandi and the basic philosophical options adopted by Galilei during his demolition of the entire Aristotelian-scholastic framework. Not all experts in the Galilean thought or of science, in fact, agree in tracing the Galilean reflection within the Platonic tradition, but one authoritative voice that has instead argued for its deep intertwining between Plato and Galilei is the German philosopher Ernst Cassirer. In this contribution I will attempt to demonstrate, partly considering two unpublished manuscripts of Cassirer, the plausibility of the Cassirerian thesis about Galilei’s physical Platonism.

Keywords

EN

abstraction; Cassirer; Galileo Galilei; idealization; science

• Publisher: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
• Journal: Filozofia i Nauka
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 11
• Pages: 161-178

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Giacomo Borbone

• Catania University, Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione, Italy

References

• Aristotle, The Categories-Prior Analytics, Cooke, Harold P. (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1967.
• Aristotle, De Caelo, Reeve, C. D. C. (ed.), Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis 2020.
• Averroes, Aristotelis Metaphysica, Venetiis (ed.), 1562.
• Bignone, E., L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro, vol. I, La Nuova Italia, Florence 1973.
• Borbone, G., Pensieri al limite. Sostanza, funzione e idealizzazione in Cassirer e Husserl, chapter II: Cassirer e il platonismo di Galileo, Diogene Edizioni, Napoli 2019, pp. 99–181.
• Borbone, G., Forma e idea. L’interpretazione di Platone nella Scuola di Marburgo e in Ernst Cassirer, Mimesis, Milan-Udine 2023.
• Burtt, E. A., The Metaphysical Foundation of Modern Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1932.
• Cahoone, L. E., Cassirer’s Interpretation of Galileo, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 1985, 16 (3), pp. 268–278.
• Cahoone, L. E., The Character of Galilei’s Inductive Method, Manuscript, 1942a.
• Cahoone, L. E., The Platonic Character of the Science of Galileo, Manuscript, 1942b.
• Cahoone, L. E., Ziele und Wege der Wirklichkeitserkenntnis, in: idem, Nachgelassene Manuskripte und Texte, vol. 2, Krois, J. M., Köhnke, K. C, Schwemmer, O. (eds.), Meiner Verlag, Hamburg 1999.
• Cahoone, L. E., Die platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge, in: idem, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 14, Plaga, F., Rosenkranz, K. (eds.), Hamburg 2002.
• Cahoone, L. E., Die Philosophie der Griechen von den Anfangen bis Platon (1932), in: idem, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 16, Clemens, J. (ed.), Meiner Verlag, Hamburg 2003a.
• Cahoone, L. E., Substance and Function, Swabey, W. C. , Swabey, M. C. (eds.), Dover Publications, Mineola 2003b.
• Cahoone, L. E., Wahrheitsbegriff und Wahrheitsproblem bei Galilei (1937), in: idem, Gesammelte Werke, vol.: Aufsätze und kleine Schriften (1936–1940), Recki, B. (ed.), Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg 2006.
• Cahoone, L. E., The Relations of Philosophical and Scientific Thought in Their Historical Development, in: idem, Nachgelassene Manuskripte und Texte, vol. 13: Philosophie der Renaissance, Möckel, von C. (ed.), Meiner Verlag, Hamburg 2020.
• Cahoone, L. E., Lectures on Ancient Philosophy, Borbone, Giacomo (ed.), Meiner Verlag, Hamburg 2022.
• Cohen, H. F., The Scientific Revolution. A Historiographical Enquiry, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London 1994.
• Coniglione, F., Between Abstraction and Idealization: Scientific Practice and Philosophical Awareness, in: Coniglione, F., Poli, R., Rollinger, R. D. (eds.), Idealization XI: Historical Studies on Abstraction, Atlanta-Amsterdam, Rodopi 2004, pp. 59–110.
• Coniglione, F., Galileo and Contemporary Epistemology. Do We Still Have Something to Learn from Galileo’s “Methodological Revolution”?, Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria, 2016, 25 (1), pp. 123–140.
• De Caro, M., Galileo e il platonismo fisico-matematico, in: Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Il platonismo e le scienze, Carocci, Rome 2012, pp. 123–142.
• Ferrari, M., Science as a Symbolic Form: Ernst Cassirer’s Culture of Reason, in: Truwant, S. (ed.), Interpreting Cassirer. Critical Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2021, pp. 72–88.
• Findlen-H. Marcus, P., The Breakdown of Galileo’s Roman Network: Crisis and Community ca. 1633, Social Studies of Science, 2017, 47 (3), pp. 326–352.
• Friedländer, P., Plato: An Introduction, Meyerhoff, H. (trans.), Princeton Legacy Library, Princeton 1973.
• Funkenstein, A., Theology and Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1989.
• Galilei, G., Postille di Galileo Galilei al libro intitolato Esercitazioni filosofiche d’Antonio Rocco, in idem, Opere, vol. 10, Tipografia de’ Classici Italiani, Milan 1811.
• Galilei, G., Letter to Benedetto Castelli, Florence, December 21, 1613, in: idem, Opere, vol. 1, edited by F. Brunetti, U.T.E.T., Turin 2005.
• Galilei, G., Letter to P. de Carcavy, Arcetri, June 5, 1637, in: idem, Opere, vol. 1, p. 944.
• Galilei, G., Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems-Ptolemaic and Copernican, Stillman Drake (trans.) and Foreword by Albert Einstein, University of California Press, Los Angeles-London 2020.
• Geymonat, L., Galileo Galilei, Einaudi, Turin 1957.
• Hatfield, G., Metaphysics and the New Science, in: Lindberg, D. C., Westman, S. (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990, pp. 93–165.
• Koyré, A., Galileo and Plato, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1843, 4, pp. 400–428.
• Lofts, S. G., Ernst Cassirer. A “Repetition” of Modernity, State University of New York Press, New York 2000.
• Merlan, P., From Platonism to Neoplatonism, Springer, Berlin 1953.
• Mill, J. St., A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, vol. I, John W. Parker-West Strand, London 1843.
• Minazzi, F., Galileo “filosofo geometra,” Rusconi, Milan 1994.
• Nowak, L., Remarks on the Nature of Galileo’s Methodological Revolution, in: series: Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 42, 1995, pp. 111–126.
• Olschki, L., Geschichte der neusprachlichen wissenschaftliche Literatur, Winter, Heidelberg 1919.
• Otto, S., Ungelöste Probleme in Diltheys und Cassirers Renaissancedeutung, in: Leinkauf, T. (ed.), Dilthey und Cassirer. Die Deutung der Neuzeit als Muster von Geistes- und Kulturgeschichte, Meiner Verlag, Hamburg 2003.
• Plato, Meno, in: idem, Five Dialogues: Euthyphro-Apology-Crito-Meno-Phaedo, Grube, G. M. A. (trans.), Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis-Cambridge 2002.
• Rey, A., La Science dans l’Antiquité, vol. 3, La Renaissance du Livre, Paris 1939.
• Cilicius Simplicius, In Aristotelis De Caelo commentaria, Heiberg, J. L. (ed.), Berlin 1894.
• Skidelsky, E., Cassirer on Science and Religion, in: Recki, B. (ed.), Philosophie der Kultur – Kultur des Philosophierens. Ernst Cassirer im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert, Meiner Verlag, Hamburg 2012.
• Steel, C., Proclus’ Defence of the Timaeus against Aristotle: A Reconstruction of a Lost Polemical Tratise, in: Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted. New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators, Bloomsbury, Mondon-Oxford-New York-New Delhi-Sidney 2016.
• Strong, E. W., Procedures and Metaphysics. A Study in the Philosophy of Mathematical-Physical Science in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, University of California Press, Berkeley 1936.
• Such, J., Plato’s Philosophy and the Essence of the Scientific Method, in: idem, Multiformity of Science, series: Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 79, Rodopi, Amsterdam–New York 2004.
• Wallace, W. A., Galileo and Reasoning Ex Suppositione: The Methodology of the Two New Sciences, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1974, pp. 79–104.
• Wallace, W., Galileo and His Sources, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1984.
• Whitehead, A. N., Science and the Modern World (1925), The Free Press, New York 1967.

Identifiers

DOI

10.37240/FiN.2023.11.1.10

Biblioteka Nauki

31233790