Philosophy as a Theory over Theories

• Authors: Piotr (Peter) Bołtuć

Abstracts

EN

We view philosophy as paradigm setting: largely, spread over leading sciences of the epoch, as well as the main developing technologies, and even socio-economic and managerial patterns. This is, obviously, a “regulatory definition,” not quite a descriptive one. We examine whether it is the science of sciences, or the science over the sciences. Thus, it is not quite a meta-science. Our point is not to view philosophy as a methodology of science, or as its maid (ancilla). Philosophy is viewed as the pinnacle of the sciences, providing them with ontological and axiological meanings. Here is one proposed definition: Philosophy is built upon the sum of general theories of all leading sciences (broadly understood); it is a theory based on this sum. The aim of philosophy so defined is to stipulate and approximate veridical worldviews, rooted in the strongest available background, which is largely the background provided by the sciences, but not quite limited to what is scientifically provable at a given point in time-this last clause is due to temporary limitedness of any science, always existing at a given time-slice. Thus, limited dependency on any principles, not only factual statements. As we know from Albert Einstein’s relativity theories and other scientific revolutions, both factual statements and higher-level principles, are always already inductively questionable, e.g., through inference to the best explanation following pragmatic, context dependent, criteria of what counts as “the best” of explanations. We also question the intuitive requirements of physicalism that are crucial to Daniel Stoljar’s thesis that physicalism cannot be properly defined. In contrast to the broadly scientistic predilection beneath the approach in the main bulk of this article we also need and require a philosophical focus on the human existential condition, which is complementary to, and not contradictory with, the above definition of philosophy. The proposed approach may be viewed as an Enlightenment approach, aware of its strengths and limits; thus, with a post-Enlightenment zing.

Keywords

EN

Philosophy as paradigm building; physicalism over the current sciences

• Publisher: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
• Journal: Filozofia i Nauka
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 11
• Pages: 7-22

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Piotr (Peter) Bołtuć

• University of Illinois at Springfield, USA
• The Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

References

• Barker, J., Undeniably Paradoxical, Polish Journal of Philosophy, 2008, 2 (1), pp. 137–142.
• Barker, J., Disquotation, Conditionals, and the Liar, Polish Journal of Philosophy, 2009, 3 (1), pp. 5–21.
• Benzon, B., Miriam Yevick on Why Both Symbols and Networks Are Necessary for Artificial
• Minds, Lesswrong.com 6th June 2022; https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/nupJLBe2xxbB8KJxc/miriam-yevick-on-why-both-symbols-and-networks-are-necessary
• Block, N., On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness, Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 1995, 18 (2), pp. 227-247.
• Boltuc, P., Moral Space for Paraconsistent AGI, in: Goertzel, B., Iklé, M, Ponomaryov, D., Potapov, D. (eds.), Artificial General Intelligence, Chapter 16, series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Science, Switzerland, 2023 pp. 83–97.
• Boltuc, P., Transhumanities as the Pinnacle and a Bridge, Humanities MDPI https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/11/1/27 vol 11/1 (2-2022)
• Boltuc, P., Strong Semantic Computing, Procedia Computer Science, 123, February, 2018, pp. 98–103; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050918300176
• Boltuc, P., Church-Turing Lovers, in: Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence; Lin, P., Abney, K., Jenkins, R. (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 2017; pp. 214–228.
• Boltuc, P., The Engineering Thesis in Machine Consciousness, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 16 (2), Spring 2012, pp. 187–207.
• Boltuc, P., What Is the Difference between Your Friend and a Church Turing Lover, in: The Computational Turn: Past, Presents and Futures? C. Ess, Hagengruber, R. (eds.), Aarchus University 2011, pp. 37–40.
• Boltuc, P., Qualia, Robots and Complementarity of Subject and Object, World Congress of Philosophy, Boston 1998; http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Mind/MindBolt.htm
• Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, René Descartes, The Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes, Lisa Shapiro (ed., trans.), University of Chicago Pres, Chicago 2007.
• Goertzel, B., Paraconsistent Interzones (and Associated Wild Speculations), Eurykosmotron, August 13, 2021; https://bengoertzel.substack.com/p/paraconsistent-interzones
• Goertzel, B., Exploring Open-Ended Intelligence Using Patternist Pilosophy, IS4SI, Philosophy and Computing September 14, 2021b; https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ3w2Jpi6DQf9aK51A0LLFA
• Goertzel, B., Paraconsistent Foundations for Probabilistic Reasoning, Programming and Concept Formation, ArXiv abs/2012.14474, 2020
• Kelley, T. D., Robotic Dreams: A Computational Justification for the Post-Hoc Processing of Episodic Memories, International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 06 (02), December 2014, pp. 109–123.
• Peacocke, Ch., Deviant Causal Chains, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 1979, 4 (1), pp. 123–155.
• Penrose, R., Quantum Theory & Free Will, The Institute of Art and Ideas, 2019; https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=428473478079787; last checked 9/20/2023.
• Silver, D. et. al., Mastering the Game of Go without Human Knowledge, Nature, 2017, 19 October; https://www.nature.com/articles/nature24270; accessed 11 September 2023.
• Sloman, A., Varieties of Evolved Forms of Consciousness, Including Mathematical Consciousness, Entropy, 2020, 22 (6), 615; https://doi.org/10.3390/e22060615
• StClair, R., Leveraging Conscious and Nonconscious Learning for Efficient AI, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2023, 17, 23 March; https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2023.1090126; also: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncom.2023.1090126/full; accesed Sept 2. 2023.
• Turing, A. M., Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind, 1950, 59 (236).
• Velmans, M., Preconscious Free Will, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2003, 10 (12), pp. 42–61.
• Weber, Z., On Paraconsistent Ethics, South African Journal of Philosophy, 2007, 26 (2), pp. 239–244; DOI: 10.4314/sajpem.v26i2.31477

Identifiers

DOI

10.37240/FiN.2023.11.1.2

Biblioteka Nauki

31233694