Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2017 | 2 (26) | 55-67

Article title

Indigeneity Discourse within Kurdish Political Movement

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This research looks at the indigenous, aspect of the Kurds and how indigenousness is expressed within the Kurdish political movement that has been paid limited attention. As this research addresses the differences between these two notions, it will be making a significant contribution on the indigenousness of Kurds that have been either widely seen as ethnic minority in the Middle East or their existence have been denied. I aim to draw scholarly attention to indigeneity discourse to address, in particular, the self-determination claim that is considered the most debated claim of indigenous peoples as self-determination, which is in the Kurdish context, one of the key demand of the Kurdish struggle is also defined as ‘democratic autonomy/democratic confederalism’ that was recognised by the United Nations in 2007 as one of the key rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Journal

Year

Issue

Pages

55-67

Physical description

Dates

published
2017

Contributors

author

References

  • Alkadry M.G. (2002), Reciting Colonial Scripts: Colonialism, Globalisation and Democracy in the Decolonized Middle East, “Administrative Theory & Praxis” Vol. 24, No. 4
  • Balci A. (2015), The Kurdish movement’s EU policy in Turkey: An analysis of a dissident ethnic bloc’s foreign policy, “Ethnicities” Vol. 15, No. 1
  • Barnard A. (2004), Indigenous Peoples: A Response to Justin Kenrick and Jerome Lewis (AT20[2]), “Anthropology Today”, Vol. 20, No. 5
  • Baser B. (2016), Diasporas and Homeland Conflicts: A Comparative Perspective, Routledge, London
  • Bengio O. (2014), Kurdish Awakening: Nation Building in a Fragmented Homeland, University of Texas Press, Austin
  • Beşikçi I. (2004), International Colony Kurdistan, Taderon Press, Parvana
  • Bozarslan H. (2000), Why the armed Struggle? Understanding the Violence in Kurdistan of Turkey, (in:) The Kurdish Conflict in Turkey: Obstacles and Chances for Peace and Democracy, (eds.) Ibrahim F., Gürbey G, , LIT Verlag, Münster
  • Casier M., Jongerden J. (2012), Understanding today’s Kurdish movement: Leftist heritage, martyrdom, democracy and gender, “European Journal of Turkish Studies” Vol. 14
  • Casier M. (2010), Designated Terrorists: The Kurdistan Workers’ Party and its Struggle to (Re) Gain Political Legitimacy, “Mediterranean Politics” Vol. 15, No. 3
  • Criss N.B. (1995), The nature of PKK terrorism in Turkey, “Studies in Conflict & Terrorism” Vol. 18, No. 7
  • Encyclopaedia Britannica (2018), Kurd – people, Kurdish settlement – Areas of Kurdish settlement in Southwest Asia, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Kurd
  • Fodella A. (2006), International Law and The Diversity of Indigenous Peoples, “Vermont Law Review”, Vol. 30, No. 565
  • Galip O.B. (2015), Imagining Kurdistan: Identity, Culture and Society, I.B.Tauris, New York
  • Gambetti Z. (2009), Politics of place/space: The spatial dynamics of the Kurdish and Zapatista movements, “New Perspectives on Turkey” Vol. 41
  • Gambetti Z., Jongerden J. (2011), The spatial (re)production of the Kurdish issue: multiple and contradicting trajectories– introduction, “Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies”, Vol. 13, No. 4
  • Gomes A. (2013), Anthropology and the Politics of Indigeneity, “Anthropological Forum” Vol. 23, No. 1
  • Graham L.R., Penny H.G. (2014), Performing Indigeneity: Global Histories and Contemporary Experiences, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln
  • Gunes C. (2007), Kurdish politics in Turkey: “a question of identity”, “International Journal of Kurdish Studies” Vol. 21, Nos. 1-2
  • Gunter M. (2013), Reopening Turkey’s Closed Kurdish Opening?, “Middle East Policy”, Vol. 20, No. 2
  • Hassanpour A. (1994), The Kurdish Experience, “Middle East Report”, Vol. 24, No. 189
  • HDP Europe (2017), History of Kurdish political parties in Turkey, http://en.hdpeurope.com/?page_id=537
  • Hennerbichler F. (2012), The Origin of Kurds, “Advances in Anthropology”, Vol. 2, No. 2
  • Houston C. (2009), An Anti-History of a Non-People: Kurds, Colonialism, and Nationalism in the History of Anthropology, “The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute”, Vol. 15, No. 1
  • International Labour Organization (1989), C169 – Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, No. 169, http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312314 [01.12.2016]
  • IWGIA (2018), IWGIA. Business Registration No. 81 29 44 10. Annual report 2017, https://www.iwgia.org/images/documents/IWGIA-Annual-Report-2017-002.pdf
  • Izady M.A.,(2009), The Kurds: A Concise History And Fact Book, Taylor & Francis, New York
  • Jongerden J. (2015), Radicalising Democracy: Power, Politics, People and the PKK, “Centre for Policy and Research on Turkey (Research Turkey)” Vol. 4, No. 3
  • Kingsbury B. (1998), Indigenous Peoples in International Law: A Constructivist Approach to the Asian Controversy, “The American Journal of International Law” Vol. 92, No. 3
  • Kurdish Institute of Paris (2017), The Kurdish population, https://www.institutkurde.org/en/info/the-kurdish-population-1232551004 [20.04.2017]
  • Leezenberg M. (2016), The ambiguities of democratic autonomy: the Kurdish movement in Turkey and Rojava, “Southeast European and Black Sea Studies” Vol. 16, No. 4
  • Marlow K. (2016), UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: who is it for?, http://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2016/09/13/un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples-who-it [26.03. 2017]
  • Oxford Dictionaries (2017), https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/autochthony
  • Reyes A., Kaufman M. (2011), Sovereignty, Indigeneity, Territory: Zapatista Autonomy and the New Practices of Decolonization, “South Atlantic Quarterly” Vol. 110, No. 2
  • The Politics of Indigeneity Dialogues and Reflections on Indigenous Activism (2011), (eds.) Venkateswar S., Hughes E, Zed Books, London
  • Sheyholislami J. (2011), Kurdish Identity, Discourse, And New Media, Palgrave Macmillan, New York
  • Šavelková L. (2011), Indigenous Peoples – Creating New “Borderlines”?, “Indigenous America – América Indígena” Vol. 4, No. 2
  • United Nations (2017), Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples, Human Rights Commission, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/IPeoples/Pages/Declaration.aspx [26.03.2017]
  • Wahlbeck Ö. (2002), The concept of diaspora as an analytical tool in the study of refugee communities, “Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, Vol. 28, No. 2
  • Weaver J (2008), Indigenousness and Indigeneity, (in:) A Companion to Postcolonial Studies, (eds.) Schwarz H., Ray, S., Oxford, Blackwell Publishing
  • Yavuz M.Y. (2007), A preamble to the Kurdish question: the politics of Kurdish identity, “Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs” Vol. 18, No. 1
  • Yeğen M. (1996), The Turkish state discourse and the exclusion of Kurdish identity, “Middle Eastern Studies” Vol. 32, No. 2
  • Zenker O. (2011), Autochthony, ethnicity, indigeneity and nationalism: Time-honouring and state-oriented modes of rooting individual – territory – group triads in a globalizing world, “Critique of Anthropology” Vol. 31, No. 1

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2052219

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_4467_24497436SCU_17_007_9636
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.