Leo Strauss's “An Epilogue”: Political Science as Political Philosophy

• Authors: Alvydas Jokubaitis

Abstracts

EN

Leo Strauss‘s article “An Epilogue” is made up of many different critical arguments about political science. The guiding principles of these arguments are not revealed clearly enough. One can even get the impression that “An Epilogue” is an unfinished article. Only after finding the guiding principles we can understand the Strauss‘s critique. He emphasized the difference between the philosophical and scientific approach to politics. “An Epilogue” shows that he understood political science as philosophy.

Keywords

EN

Leo Strauss; political philosophy; political science; philosophy of political science

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Jagielloński
• Journal: Teoria Polityki
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 5
• Pages: 193-203

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Alvydas Jokubaitis

• University of Vilnius

• https://orcid.org/0000000292773662

References

• Behnegar, N. (2003). Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Behnegar, N. (2009). “Strauss and Social Science”. In: S.B. Smith (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Strauss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–240.
• Bloom, A. (1974). “Leo Strauss: September 20, 1899 – October 18, 1973”. Political Theory, 2(4), pp. 372–392.
• Crick, B. (1962). In Defence of Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Cropsey, J. (1975). “Leo Strauss. A Bibliography and Memorial 1899–1973”. Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(2), pp. 133–147.
• Foucault, M. (1989). The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. London–New York: Routledge.
• Gourevitch, V. (1968). “Philosophy and Politics, I”. The Review of Metaphysics, 22(1), 60, pp. 58–84.
• Gunnell, J.G. (1986). Between Philosophy and Politics: The Alienation of Political Theory. Armherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
• Hayek, F. (1955). The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. London: The Free Press of Glencoe, Collier-Macmillan Limited.
• Norton, A. (2004). Leo Strauss and Politics of American Empire. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
• Oakeshott, M. (1991). Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
• Schmitt, C. (1986). Political Romanticism. Cambridge, MA–London: The MIT Press.
• Shaar, J.H., Wolin, S. (1963). “Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics: A Critique Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics by Herbert J. Storing”. The American Political Science Review, 57(1), pp. 125–160.
• Strauss, L. (1947). “On the Intention of Rousseau”. Social Research, 14(1/4), pp. 455–487.
• Strauss, L. (1963). “Replies to Shaar and Wolin: I–VI”. The American Political Science Review, 57(1), pp. 151–160.
• Strauss, L. (1965). Natural Right and History. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Strauss, L. (1978). The City and Man. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Strauss, L. (1989). “Social Science and Humanism”. In: T.L. Pangle (ed.). The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism: An Introduction to the Thought of Leo Strauss. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Strauss, L. (1995). “An Epilogue”. In: Liberalism Ancient and Modern, Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 203–223. The article first appeared in: Storing, H.J. (ed.). (1962). Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics. New York–Chicago–San Francisco–Toronto–London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., pp. 307–327.
• Unger, R.M. (1984). Knowledge and Politics. New York: The Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.

Identifiers

DOI

10.4467/25440845TP.21.013.13793

Biblioteka Nauki

2046438