Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 1 | 179-193

Article title

The Trump Presidency, Federal Judges, and American Law

Content

Title variants

PL
Prezydentura Trumpa, sędziowie federalni i prawo amerykańskie

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Nominacje sędziów federalnych dokonane przez prezydenta Donalda Trumpa były ważnym osiągnięciem jego prezydentury (w szczególności chodzi o trzy nominacje sędziów Sądu Najwyższego). Będą one miały znaczący wpływ na amerykańską rzeczywistość polityczną i prawną na długo. Nominacje te bywają krytykowane z pozycji ideologicznych, ale reprezentują znaczący i pozytywny powrót do oryginalnego rozumienia w amerykańskim konstytucjonalizmie właściwej roli sędziów i sądowej kontroli działalności agencji administracyjnych.
EN
President Donald Trump’s appointments to the US federal judiciary were a major accomplishment of his presidency (in particular, his three Supreme Court appointments). They are likely to have a significant impact on American political and legal life for a long time to come. The appointments have been criticized by some, on ideological grounds, but they represent a significant and beneficial return to the original understanding in American constitutionalism of the proper role of judges and judicial review.

Year

Issue

1

Pages

179-193

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

  • University of Dallas

References

  • “A Speech by Attorney General Edwin Meese III before the American Bar Association, July 9, 1985”, [in:] The Great Debate: Interpreting Our Written Constitution, The Federalist Society, https://www.ruleoflawus.info/Constitutional%20Interpretation/Federalist%20Soc.-Great%20Debate-Interpreting%20Our%20Constitution.pdf [accessed: 4.06.2021].
  • Baum L., Devins N., “Federalist Court: How the Federalist Society became the de facto selector of Republican Supreme Court justices”, Slate, January 31, 2017, https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/01/how-the-federalist-society-became-the-de-factoselector-of-republican-supreme-court-justices.html [accessed: 4.06.2021].
  • Baum L., Devins N., “Ideological Imbalance: Why Democrats usually pick moderate-liberal justices and Republicans usually pick conservative ones”, Slate, March 17, 2016, https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/03/democrats-always-pick-moderates-likemerrick-garland.html [accessed: 4.06.2021].
  • Berger R., Government by Judiciary: the transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA–London 1977.
  • Federal Judges Nominated by Donald Trump, Ballotpedia, https://ballotpedia.org/Federal_judges_nominated_by_Donald_Trump [accessed: 4.06.2021].
  • Lyman R., Berendt J., “Protests Erupt in Poland Over New Law on Public Gatherings”, The New York Times, December 13, 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/ world/europe/poland-protests.html [accessed: 4.06.2021].
  • O’Brien D.M., Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, 8th ed., W.W. Norton, New York 2008.
  • Smale A., “‘We Don’t Need to Be Alone’: A Political Shift Has Poland Assessing Its Values”, The New York Times, August 10, 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/11/ world/europe/poland-debate-values.html [accessed: 4.06.2021].
  • Sollenberger M.A., “CSR Report for Congress: The History of the Blue Slip in the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 1917-Present”, updated October 22, 2003, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL32013.pdf [accessed: 4.06.2021].
  • United States Courts, Current Judicial Vacancies, http://www.uscourts.gov/judgesjudgeships/judicial-vacancies/current-judicial-vacancies [accessed: 14.07.2018].
  • United States Courts, Future Judicial Vacancies, http://www.uscourts.gov/judgesjudgeships/judicial-vacancies/future-judicial-vacancies [accessed: 14.07.2018].
  • Wolfe Ch., The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Judicial Interpretation to JudgeMade Law, revised and expanded edition, Rowman and Littlefield, Maryland–London 1994.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2029575

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_48269_2451-0610-ksm-2021-1-006
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.