Paragraphs for Space Shoggoths, Bush robots, and Dyson Trees – the legal complexity of manufacturing space objects using natural and artificial space resources

• Authors: Kamil Muzyka

Abstracts

EN

Planning a space mission is mostly constrained by factors of payload mass and vol- ume, as well as the efficiency of systems and launch capabilities of a provider. Nearly all contemporary satellites carry a limited number of spare fuel for maneuvering and station keeping, no spare parts, not even means to provide proper repairs. The future of space mission architecture is dependent on both, the interconnectedness of its elements as well as sustainability and optimized logistics. This calls for more operations requiring robots as servicers, factories, constructors resource extractors, and power providers. It is very easy to simply dismiss the concept of ISRU (In-situ Space Resource Utilization), OSAM (On-orbit Servicing, Assembly and Manufactur- ing) and Recycling/Upcycling in space by declaring the low tech readiness level of required technologies, or that they have been discussed in the years between 1960- 1990, causing controversy in both scholarly fields as well as within space policy itself. It should be noted, that visions of space progress driven by vast industrialization and extraction/processing/manufacturing capacities were the reason that the L5-Society, The National Space Institute, AIAA and others have advocated for the rejection of the Moon Agreement of 1979. Similarly, we can see a gradual shift in discussing space resource utilization rights, which have recently gained more and more trac- tion due to national developments of The United States, Luxembourg, or the United Arab Emirates, to discuss the problems, and issues involving space products and objects partially of fully composed of space resources. The scope of this paper is to discuss the impact of the ability of space objects, whether one or a group of them, being able to construct other space resources using either natural resources ex- tracted from a celestial body, and outer space, or reusing elements of space debris or wreckage. The title uses the terms like a “shoggoth” or bush robot, which in this paper are in- terchangeable concepts of modular, reconfigurable robotic space objects capable of extracting resources, materials processing, constructing components, elements or whole new space objects, including its copy, in the sense similar to Moore’s Ar- tificial living plants, or von Neumann’s universal kinematic assembler. Although being inspired by science fiction literature and futurology, there have been many academic approaches or even demonstrations of either partly self-replicable hylo- technological machines, or modular robots, even forms of so-called “utility fog”. The concept of Dyson Tree, is being brought to bridge the legal gap between biological and hylotechnological solutions, as well as to present a different approach to what actual ISRU might look like. This paper will mostly focus on the field of space law as it is relevant to identify problems arising from space objects being manufactured in outer space and out of space resources, although it will address some aspects of patent law.

• Publisher: Instytut Metropolitalny
• Journal: Ad Astra. Program badań nad astropolityką i prawem kosmicznym
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 5-22

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Kamil Muzyka

• Institute for Law Studies of The Polish Academy of Sciences

• https://orcid.org/0000000335194223

References

• A. F. Hepp, et al., In-Situ Resource Utilization for Space Exploration: Resource Pro- cessing, MissionEnabling Technologies, and Lessons for Sustainability on Earth and Beyond [in]: 12th Int. Energy Convers. Eng. Conf., Cleveland, OH, 2014. Article no. AIAA–2014–3761.
• https://www.ida.org/-/media/feature/publications/g/gl/ global-trends-in-on-orbit-servicing-assembly-and-manufacturing-osam/d-13161. ashx [accessed 29.10.2021].
• https://space.nss.org/ reaching-for-the-high- 5/ [accessed 29.10.2021].
• W. P. McCray, The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Col- onies, Nanotechnologies and a Limitless Future, Princeton University Press 2013.
• At the Mountains of Madness – HP Lovecraft, Modern Library 2005.
• H. Moravec. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, USA 1988.
• H. Moravec, Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind, Oxford University Press, USA 2000.
• E. F. Moore, Artificial Living Plants, Scientific American 1956, vol. 195, no. 4, pp. 118-126.
• J. von Neumann, A. W Burks, Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, University of Illinois Press 1966.
• C. Sagan, A. Dryuann, Comet, 1985.
• F. J. Dyson, Disturbing the universe, 1979.
• F. Herbert, Dune, Chilton Books 1965.
• K. E. Tsiolkovsky’s “Dreams of Earth and Sky”.
• Garrett P. Serviss’s “Edison’s Conquest of Mars".
• http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789400720381 [accessed 29.10.2021].
• http://search.itu.int/history/HistoryDigitalCollectionDocLibrary/5.17.61.en.100.pdf [accessed 29.10.2021].
• https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/203084main_ISRU%20TEC%2011-07%20V3.pdf [accessed 29.10.2021].
• N. Labeaga-Martínez, S. Rivo, M. Díaz-Álvarez and J.Martínez-Frías, Additive Manufacturing for a Moon village, Procedia Manufacturing 2017, no. 13.
• G.L. Matloff, A. J. Fennelly, Interstellar Applications and Limitations of Several Electrostatic/ Electromagnetic Ion Collection Techniques, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (JBIS) 1977, no. 30.
• G. Matloff, E. Mallove, The Starflight Handbook A Pioneer's Guide to Interstellar Travel, Wiley, USA 1989.
• R.W. Bussard, Galactic Matter and Interstellar Flight, Astronautica Acta 1960, no. 6.
• M. C. W. Pinto, Emerging Concepts of the Law of the Sea: Some Social and Cultural Aspects, UNESCO, Impact of Science and Technology 1984, no. 4.
• Article 6.2 of the Moon Agreement of 1979.
• R. A. Freitas, A Self-Reproducing Interstellar Probe, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 1980.
• R. A. Feitas, W. Zachary, A Self-Replicating, Growing Lunar Factory, Space manufacturing, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1981, no. 4.
• https://groundbasedspacematters.com/index.php/2019/08/22/no-tardigrades-here/ (Accessed: 29.10.2021)
• Zocca, A., Lüchtenborg, J., Mühler, „Enabling the 3D Printing of Metal Components in μ-Gravity “ J.: Adv. Mater. Technol. 4(10), 1900506 (2019).
• M. Ott, W. Thomas and F. Larocca, Optical Fiber Assemblies for Space Flight from the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA Goddard Report 2014.
• A. Ellery, “Space Exploration Through Self-Replication Technology Compensates for Discounting in Net Present Value Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Business Case?”, New Space, Vol.5, No.3, 2017 (http://doi.org/10.1089/space.2017.0017).
• M. A. Arbib, Cyril Ponnamperuma, A. G. W. Cameron (ed.), The Likelihood of the Evolution of Communicating Intelligences on Other Planets. Interstellar Communication: Scientific Perspectives, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company 1974.
• G. Chirikjian, Self-replicating robots for lunar development, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron 2002, no. 7.
• W. P. Gilbreath, R. A. Freitas, Advanced Automation for Space Missions, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Santa Clara, California 1980.
• K. Hamashima et al., Creation of Unnatural Base Pairs for Genetic Alphabet Expansion Toward Synthetic Xenobiology”, Current Opinion Chemical Biology 2014, October, no 46.
• A. Ellery, How to build a biological machine using engineering materials and methods, Biomimetics 2020, no. 5(3).
• M. C. Mineiro, Space Technology Export Controls and International Cooperation in Outer Space, Springer 2012.
• https:// osp.mit.edu/compliance/export-control/guidance-documents/my-satellite-itar- or-ear [accessed 29.10.2021].
• M. K. Carrier, An Introduction to U.S. Export Control: Regulations for Patent Practitioners, Akron Intellectual Property Journal 2011, vol. 5, Article 1.
• T. U. Ro, et al., “Patent Infringement in Outer Space in Light of 35 U.S.C. § 105: Fol- lowing the White Rabbit Down the Rabbit Loophole”, Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 17 (2011).
• Hughes Aircraft Company, v. United States of America, No. 426-73 United States Court Of Federal Claims 29 Fed. Cl. 197 August 16, 1993.
• https://evosphere.eu/ [accessed 29.10.2021].
• US 2004 Sunken Military Craft Act (SMCA).
• E. C. Dolman, Astropolitik: classical geopolitics in the Space Age, Frank Cass London ; Portland, OR 2002.
• D. Forgan, Predator-prey behaviour in self-replicating interstellar probes, In- ternational Journal of Astrobiology 2019, no. 18(6)(DOI:10.1017/ S1473550419000053) [accessed 29.10.2021].
• P. Glister, Centauri Dreams. Imagining and planning interstellar exploration, Copernicus Book 2004.
• A. A. Ellery, Exploration and Utilization of Extra-Terrestrial Bodies, Earth and Space, 2016. (DOI:10.1061/9780784479971.066).
• S. Kriegman, D. Blackiston, M. Levin, J. Bongard, A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2020, no. 117 (4), (DOI:10.1073/pnas.1910837117).
• W. Langford, A. Ghassaei, B. Jenett, N. Gershenfeld, Hierarchical assembly of a self-replicating spacecraft, IEEE Aerospace Conference 2017 (DOI:10.1109/ aero.2017.7943956).
• Bowman v. Monsanto Co., 569 U.S. 278 (2013) – SCOTUS.
• Graham K. Shunk, Xavier R. Gomez, Nils J. H. Averesch, A Self-Replicating Radia- tion-Shield for Human Deep-Space Exploration: Radiotrophic Fungi can Attenuate Ionizing Radiation aboard the International Space Station, bioRxiv , 16.07. 2020 (preprint); (DOI:10.1101/2020.07.16.205534).
• R. Armstrong, Star Ark. A Living Self-sustaining spaceship, Springer 2016.
• F.J. Dyson, Infinite in all Directions, Harper&Row, New York (USA) 1988.
• A. Ellery, The ultimate bio-inspiration: how to build a self-replicating machine to colonize the Moon, Proc. SPIE 11374, Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication X 2020, PROCEEDINGS VOLUME 11374 (22 April 2020) (DOI:10.1117/12.2552408).
• R. A. Feitas, W. Zachary, A Self-Replicating, Growing Lunar Factory, Space manufacturing 1981, no. 4.
• D. Forgan, Predator-prey behaviour in self-replicating interstellar probes, International Journal of Astrobiology 2019, no. 18(6), (DOI:10.1017/ S1473550419000053).
• https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/e/roman/texts/plutarch/lives/theseus*.html [accessed: 29.10.2021].
• https://archive.org/details/englishworkstho21hobbgoog/page/n8/mode/2up [accessed 29.10.2021].
• https://catalog.afi.com/Film/23251-YOU-ONLYLIVETWICE [accessed 29.10.2021].

Identifiers

DOI

10.53261/adastra20210202

Biblioteka Nauki

2029475