Prometheus of a scapegoat? Humans in the discourse of the anthropocene and the concept of mimesis and persecution pattern by René Girard: attempts at pedagogical reflection

• Authors: Monika Humeniuk

Abstracts

EN

The discourse of the Anthropocene expresses an interesting tension in the way human causation and guilt are framed. On the one hand, the Anthropos is a unique species, making historical, geographical and geological conquest single-handedly (to the exclusion of non-human subjects). A triumphant and increasingly dominant coloniser of a planet that ultimately falls very low, indeed. In the light of the impending climate catastrophe, the “age of man” no longer sounds so noble today. On the contrary, it becomes a testimony of discredit and decline, a sign of egoism and planetary destruction by one species. Among the many approaches and attempts to address and nuance the discourse and amidst the search for the most appropriate labels (e.g. Capitalocene, chtchulucene, ecozoic, etc.), it is the Anthropocene or post-Anthropocene that seem to remain the ones most frequently referred to in colloquial or journalistic discourse. A need arises to clearly identify the one to blame for the impending climatic apocalypse. Under conditions of crisis, during what Girard call undifferentiation, the Anthropos selects itself as the scapegoat, becoming both the unfortunate, guilt-ridden OTHER and the ruthless, violence-hungry MOB. Could René Girard’s concept of mimesis and scapegoating help to understand the pattern of this dialectical, subversive strategy? If so, then perhaps it is to be expected that the stage of sacralisation of the victim, which crowns the logic of scapegoating, instead of overcoming it, will only perpetuate the apotheosis of human agency, dangerous from the point of view of the actual state of the planet. This time, these will be essentially anthropocentric and technologically advanced “escapes forward”, such as exploitation of the moon or other planets, invasive prevention of further ice and greenhouse ages, deflecting asteroids so that they do not collide with Earth, and other, hardly predictable spectacular gestures of the triumphant Anthropos. The above questions are the subject matter of this article and a pretext for pedagogical reflection.

Keywords

EN

René Girard; scapegoating; mimesis; anthropos; anthropocene; climate crisis; anti-natalism; non-atropocentric pedagogy

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Chrześcijańskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Warszawie
• Journal: Studia z Teorii Wychowania
• Year: 2023
• Volume: XIV(2 (43))
• Pages: 199-218

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Monika Humeniuk

• University of Wrocław, Poland

References

• Andrzejewska, A. (2018). Ekologiczna etyka ze spektrum posthumanizmu. Zarys perspektywy i przypadek ogrodu działkowego. Etyka 57, 121-136.
• Attfield, R. (2010). Creation, Environment and Ethicks: some Cardiff-Based Contributions to Philosophy. In: R. Humphreys, S.Vlacos (ed.), Creation, Environment and Ethics, Cambridge Scholars, 1-12.
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Sings. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3), 801-831.
• Barnosky, A. D., Hadly, E. A., Bascompte, J., Berlow, E. L., Brown, J. H., et. al. (2012). Approaching a State Shift in Earth’s Biosphere. Nature 486, 52-58.
• Bińczyk, E. (2018). Epoka człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocenu, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PWN.
• Callicott, J. (1989). Genesis Revisited: Muriam Musings on the Lynn White, Jr. Debate, Environmental History Review 14(1989)1-2, 65-90.
• Chutorański, M. (2020). Nie(tylko)ludzkie wymiary edukacji. W stronę pedagogiki nieantropocentrycznej. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
• Crist, E. (2016). On the Poverty of Our Nomenclature. In: J. W. Moore (ed.). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism (pp. 14-33). Oakland: PM Press.
• Domańska, E. (2007). Zwrot performatywny we współczesnej humanistyce. Teksty Drugie 5, 48-61.
• Domańska, E. (2012). Historia egzystencjalna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Girard, R. (1979). Violence and the Sacred, transl. P. Gregory. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Girard, R. (1987a). Job: The Victim of His People, transl. Y. Freccero. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Girard, R. (1987b). Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World. Research Undertaken in Collaboration with Jean-Michel Oughourlian and Guy Lefort, transl. P. Bann and M. Metter. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Girard, R. (1989). The Scapegoat, transl. Y. Freccero. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Habel N.C. (2011), The Birth, the Curse and the Greening od Earth. An ecological reading of Genesis1-11, The Earth Bible Commentary, Sheffield Phoenix Press.
• Habel N.C.(2008), Introducing Ecological Hermeneutics, w: Exploring Ecological Hermeneutics (SBL.SympS46), red. N.C.Habel, P.Trudinger, Atlanta.
• Habel N.C (2000), Introducting the Earth Bible, w: Readings from the Perspective of Earth (EB1), red. N.C.Habel, Sheffield, Cleveland.
• Habel N.C., The Earth Bible, https://www.sbl-site.org/publications/article.aspx?ArticleId=291 dostęp: 15.12.2021 godz. 16.35
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene. In: J. W. Moore (ed.). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism (pp. 34-76). Oakland: PM Press.
• Hitzhusen, G.E. (2007), Judeo-Christians Theology and the Environment: Moving Beyond Scepticism to New Sources for Environmental education in the United States, Environmental Education Research, 13(2007) 1, 55-74.
• Humeniuk, M. (2020). Koncepcja kozła ofiarnego René Girarda jako inspiracja dla edukacji miedzykulturowej. Edukacja Międzykulturowa 2(13), 233-244.
• Kociuba, M. (1998). Kulturotwórcza rola przemocy w koncepcjach René Girarda. Nowa Krytyka 9, 137-157.
• Kociuba, M. (2004). Znamię Kaina. In: Przemoc i filozofia (p. 203-222). Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
• Kociuba, M. (2006). Geneza rytuału w kontekście antropologii R. Girarda. In: M. Filipiak, M. Rajewski (ed.). Rytuał. Przeszłość i teraźniejszość (pp. 71-97). Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
• Kociuba, M. (2007). René Girard o początkach kultury. Znak 6(625), 141-150.
• Kociuba, M. (2008). Freudowski kompleks René Girarda – między apologią a odrzuceniem. In: Z. Rosińska, J. Michalik, P. Bursztyka (ed.). Freud i nowoczesność (pp. 17-32). Kraków: Universitas.
• Kociuba, M. (2014). Przemoc według René Girarda. Struktura teorii i konteksty recepcji. Ethos 2(106), 245-259.
• Mallett, R. K. (2012). Eco-guilt motivates eco-friendly behavior. Ecopsychology 4(3), 223-231.
• Marzec, A. (2021). Antropocień. Filozofia i estetyka po końcu świata. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• McHarg I.L. (2006), Values, Process and Form, w: I.L.McHarg, The Essential Ian McHarg: Writings on Design and Nature, Washington: Island Press, 47-61.
• Michaux, H. (1988). Wspomnienia. In: A. Międzyrzecki, Rimbaud, Apollinaire i inni (Wybór przekładów). Warszawa: Czytelnik.
• Mkono, M., Hughes, K. (2020). Eco-guilt and eco-shame in tourism consumption contexts: understanding the triggers and responses. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 28, 1223-1244.
• Moore, J. W. (2016). Introduction. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. In: J. W. Moore (ed.). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism (pp. 1-11). Oakland: PM Press.
• Nash, J. (1996), Toward the Ecological Reformation of Christianity, Interpretation. A Journal of Bible and Theology,50(1996)1, 5-15.
• Nicholson, M. (1970), The Environmental Revolution. A Guide for the New Masters of the Earth, London: Hodder and Stoughton.
• Nycz, R. (2017). Nowa humanistyka w Polsce: kilka bardzo subiektywnych obserwacji, koniektur, refutacji. Teksty Drugie 1, 18-40.
• Ross, D. (2021). The Question Concerning the Anthropocene. In: Z. Badovinac, G. Ferracci (ed.). Bigger than Myself. Heroic Voices from Ex-Yugoslavia (pp. 48-170). A catalog for an exhibition at the MAXXI Museum in Rome, Forma Edizioni.
• Scranton, R. (2015). Learning to Die in the Anthropocene. Reflections on the End of a Civilization. San Francisco: City Lights.
• Toynbee, A.J. (1974). The Religious Background of the present Environmental Crisis. In: D.Spring, E.Spring (ed.) Ecology and religion in History, New York-Evanston-San Francisko-London: Harper&Row, 137-149.
• Urbańska, A. (1997). Koncepcja mimesis Rene Girarda. Etnografia Polska 41, issue 1-2, 21-45.
• Urbańska-Szymoszyn, A. (2013). Mimesis i przemoc. U podstaw Girardowskiej teorii kształtowania się zjawisk kulturowo-społecznych. Rocznik Antropologii Historii 2(5), 51-82.
• Vonnegut, K. (1999). Deadeye Dick. New York: Dial Press Trade Paperback.
• White Jr., L. T. (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science 55, 1203-1207.
• Worster, D. (1994). Nature’s Economy: a History of Ecological Ideas, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0053.9082

Biblioteka Nauki

36799162