Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | XIV(2 (43)) | 341-355

Article title

Populism, counter-democracy, and counter-education. Notes on the imagination about antidote to the crisis of liberal democracy

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Despite the convergence in the wording, the concepts of Ilan Gur-Ze'ev's counter-education and Pierre Rosanvallon's counter-democracy remain independent of each other, but they have a common denominator, which, in my opinion, allows us to look at the complexity of the relationship between education and populism from a pedagogical point of view and perceive its ambiguity. As for populism itself, its media and political understanding most often confronts it with democracy, seeing populism as a kind of threat. In such a context, it is easy to present education in its various form as an unequivocal antidote to the threat so understood. However, some researchers of populism, such as Margaret Canovan, Roger Eatwell, Matthew Goodwin, or Pierre-André Taguieff, recognise the complexity of the relationship between populism and democracy, its ambiguity, which may also help to revise the view on the role of education in preparing citizens to face the populist challenge. Consequently, it can be assumed that the findings of P. Rosanvallon, I. Gur-Ze'ev and M. Canovan allow the question of populism in educational theory and practice to be raised anew. The theoretical perspective I have adopted will allow me, I believe, to develop two propositions: first, that populism is to some extent a development, an increase in the inalienable property of democracy, which in effect turns against itself; second, that this property also characterizes education. This is related to what democracy and education promise us, or what we think democracy and education promise us, and which, if they are lacking, do not arouse our enthusiasm or the interest necessary to defend or develop them.

Year

Volume

Pages

341-355

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • University of Wrocław, Poland

References

  • Antoszewski, A. (2016). Współczesne teorie demokracji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.
  • Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy, Political Studies 47 (1), 2–16.
  • Canovan, M. (2002). Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy. In: Y. Mény, Y. Surel (eds.). Democracies and the Populist Challenge (pp. 25–44). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Canovan, M. (2005). The People. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Eatwell, R., Goodwin, M. (2018). National Populism: The Revolt against Liberal Democracy. London: Pelican.
  • Gur-Ze’ev, I. (1998a). Toward a Nonrepressive Critical Pedagogy. Educational Theory 48(4), 463–486.
  • Gur-Ze’ev, I. (1998b). Walter Benjamin and Max Horkheimer. From Utopia to Redemption. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 8(1), 119–155.
  • Gur-Ze’ev, I. (2003). Socrates, Counter-Education, and Diasporic Love in a Postmodern Era. Journal of Thought 38(3), 41–65.
  • Gur-Ze’ev, I. (2005). Critical Theory and Critical Pedagogy Today. Toward a New Critical Language in Education (Introduction). In: I. Gur-Ze’ev (ed.). Critical Theory and Critical Pedagogy Today. Toward a New Critical Language in Education (pp. 7–43). Haifa: Faculty of Education University of Haifa.
  • Gur-Ze’ev, I., Masschelein, J., Blacke, N. (2001). Reflectivity, Reflection, and Counter-Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20, 93–106.
  • Moffitt, B. (2018). The Populism/Anti-Populism Divide in Western Europe. Democratic Theory 5(2), 1–16.
  • Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy. Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
  • Mudde, C., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Müller, J.-W. (2016). What Is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy. Politics in an Age of Distrust, transl. A. Goldhammer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosenvallon, P. (2018). Good Government: Democracy beyond Elections, transl. M. DeBevoise. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
  • Rosenvallon, P. (2019). Przedmowa do wydania polskiego. In: P. Rosanvallon. Dobre rządy, transl. G. Majcher (pp. 9–11). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog.
  • Rosenvallon, P. (2021). The Populist Century. History, Theory, Critique, transl. C. Porter. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Taguieff, P.-A. (1995). Political Science Confronts Populism: From a Conceptual Mirage to a Real Problem. Telos 103, 9–43.
  • Włodarczyk, R. (2022). Utopia, Populism, Education. Between Hope and Risk of Fulfilling the Promise of Democracy. In: R. Włodarczyk. Utopia and Education. Studies in Philosophy, Theory of Education and Pedagogy of Asylum (pp. 151–180). Wrocław: Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
36798833

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_5604_01_3001_0053_9102
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.