Hermeneutics and comparative education. Language as material and powerful tool for assigning meanings, understanding, and transforming information

• Authors: Renata Nowakowska-Siuta

Abstracts

EN

Language and the processes of understanding the meaning of the concepts we use are of particular interest to scholars of comparative pedagogy, intercultural pedagogy, and other fields dealing with intercultural communication processes. It is also evident that the methodology of comparative pedagogy must include considering the process of understanding, for it is not possible to describe the solutions used in education without understanding the strategies that had led to a certain state of affairs. The article discusses the issue of understanding the meanings of concepts as a necessary methodological procedure of comparative pedagogy. It provides examples of theoretical perspectives on the importance of language as a tool we use to communicate, store and transform information. The article also shows the link between culture and the vocabulary and pragmatics of language and the extra-linguistic possibilities of understanding meanings.

Keywords

EN

comparative pedagogy; pedagogical hermeneutics; methodology of comparative pedagogy; understanding scientific concepts

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Chrześcijańskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Warszawie
• Journal: Studia z Teorii Wychowania
• Year: 2023
• Volume: XIV(2 (43))
• Pages: 387-397

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Renata Nowakowska-Siuta

• Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw, Poland

References

• Adorno, T. (1986), Dialektyka negatywna, Warszawa: PWN.
• Bargh J.A. (2006), Social Psychology and the Unconscious The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes, Psychology Press, New York, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783016 [dostęp: 28.11.2022].
• Buber, M. (1954), Die Schriften über das dialogische Prinzip, Heidelberg: Schneider.
• Fodor, J. (1983), Modularity of Mind. An Essay on Faculty Psychology, Cambridge:MIT University Press.
• Gadamer, H.-G. (1990), Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck), wyd. 6.
• Gudykunst, W.B. (1988), Uncertainty and Anxiety [w:] Y.Y. Kim, W.B. Gudykunst (red.),Theories in Intercultural Communication, Newbury Park: Sage, p. 125–128.
• Marcuse, H. (1976), Repressive Tolerance [w:] P. Connerton (red.), Critical Sociology, Harmondsworth: Penguin, p. 156–174.
• Milerski, B. (2011), Hermeneutyka pedagogiczna. Perspektywy pedagogiki religii, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe ChAT.
• Richards, I.A. (1930), Practical Criticism. A Study of Literary Judgment, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd, , [dostęp: 9.01.2021].
• Rogers, C. (2002), O stawaniu się sobą, Poznań: Rebis.
• Sapir, E. (1978), Kultura, język, osobowość. Wybrane eseje, Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
• Ting-Toomey, p. (1988), Culture and Interpersonal Communication, Newbury Park: Sage.
• Ting-Toomey, S., Kurogi, A. (1998), Facework Competence in Intercultural Conflict: An Updated Face-Negotiation Theory, „International Journal of Intercultural Relations Communication”, nr 22, p. 187–225.
• Whorf, L.B. (1982), Język, myśl i rzeczywistość, Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
• Gałganek A. (2019), Deduction and Induction in Theorizing of International Relations, „Przegląd Politologiczny”, nr 4(24), DOI : 10.14746/pp.2019.24.4.4 [dostęp: 2.02.2023].
• Lorenz K. (1977), Odwrotna strona zwierciadła. Próba historii naturalnej ludzkiego poznania, [wyd. niem.: Die Rückseite des Spiegels], tłum. K. Wolicki, [Seria Biblioteka Myśli Współczesnej], Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa.
• Waltz K.N. (2004), Neorealism: Confusions and Criticism, „Journal of Politics and Society”, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 2–6, https://ir101.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Waltz-Neorealism-Confusions-and-Criticisms.pdf [dostęp: 2.02.2023].
• Woleński J. (2014), Filozofia nauki a historia nauki, [Prace Komisji Historii Nauki PAU, t. XIII], Kraków.

Identifiers

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0053.9105

Biblioteka Nauki

36425317