Application of multivariate statistical analysis to assess the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 8 in European Union countries

• Authors: Beata Bieszk-Stolorz , Krzysztof Dmytrów

Title variants

PL

Zastosowanie wielowymiarowej analizy statystycznej do oceny realizacji Celu Zrównoważonego Rozwoju 8 w krajach Unii Europejskiej

Abstracts

PL

Zrównoważony rozwój powinien zapewnić sprawiedliwe i zrównoważone środowisko naturalne, społeczne i gospodarcze. Godna praca i wzrost gospodarczy, czyli Cel Zrównoważonego Rozwoju (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG) 8, ma największe znaczenie gospodarcze. Celem badania omawianego w artykule jest ocena realizacji SDG 8 w krajach członkowskich UE. Badanie obejmowało lata 2002–2021, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem okresów kryzysowych: kryzysu finansowego z lat 2007–2009 i pandemii COVID-19 panującej w latach 2020–2021. W badaniu wykorzystano dane z bazy Eurostatu. Zastosowano metody wielowymiarowej analizy statystycznej: analizę skupień metodą k-średnich i porządkowanie liniowe metodą TOPSIS. Krajami o najwyższym stopniu realizacji SDG 8 okazały się: Dania, Finlandia, Holandia i Szwecja, natomiast najniższy stopień realizacji obserwowano w Grecji, we Włoszech, w Rumunii, na Słowacji i w Hiszpanii. Również nowe kraje członkowskie, przyjęte do UE po 2004 r., ogólnie charakteryzują się znacznie niższym stopniem realizacji SDG 8 niż wysoko rozwinięte kraje Europy Zachodniej. Wpływ okresów kryzysowych był bardziej zauważalny w wynikach analizy skupień niż w rankingach. Wartością dodaną badania jest wykorzystanie metod wielowymiarowej analizy statystycznej do oceny ogólnej sytuacji analizowanych krajów w zakresie realizacji SDG 8 przy uwzględnieniu obu okresów kryzysowych.

EN

Sustainable development should ensure a fair and balanced natural, social and economic environment. Sustainable Development Goal 8 (SDG 8) - decent work and economic growth - is of the greatest economic importance. The purpose of the study is to assess the implementation of SDG 8 in EU member states. The analysis covered the years 2002-2021 with a particular focus on two crises periods: the financial crisis of 2007-2009 and the COVID-19 pandemic in the years 2020-2021. The study uses Eurostat data and multivariate statistical analysis methods, i.e. cluster analysis - the k-means method and linear ordering - the TOPSIS method. Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden are the countries where the fulfilment of SDG 8 was the greatest, while the lowest was observed in Greece, Italy, Romania, Slovakia and Spain. The study also shows that the countries which joined the EU in 2004 generally demonstrated a much lower degree of SDG 8 implementation compared to the well-developed Western Europe. The influence of the crisis periods was more visible in the results of the cluster analysis than in the rankings. The novelty of the research involves the application of multivariate statistical analysis methods to assess the overall situation of the studied countries in terms of their implementation of SDG 8 while taking into account both crisis periods.

Keywords

EN

sustainable development; Sustainable Development Goal 8; decent work and economic growth; EU member states; TOPSIS method; k-means method

PL

zrównoważony rozwój; Cel Zrównoważonego Rozwoju 8; godna praca i wzrost gospodarczy; kraje członkowskie UE; metoda TOPSIS; metoda k-średnich

• Publisher: Główny Urząd Statystyczny
• Journal: Wiadomości Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 68
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 22-43

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Beata Bieszk-Stolorz

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Instytut Ekonomii i Finansów

• https://orcid.org/0000000180869037

author

Krzysztof Dmytrów

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Instytut Ekonomii i Finansów

• https://orcid.org/0000000176576063

References

• Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2021). Institutional Quality, Governance and Progress towards the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(21), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111798.
• Bieszk-Stolorz, B., & Dmytrów, K. (2020). Influence of Accession of the Visegrad Group Countries to the EU on the Situation in Their Labour Markets. Sustainability, 12(16), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166694.
• Bieszk-Stolorz, B., & Dmytrów, K. (2022). Assessment of the Similarity of the Situation in the EU Labour Markets and Their Changes in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063646.
• Clemente-Suárez, V. J., Navarro-Jiménez, E., Moreno-Luna, L., Saavedra-Serrano, M. C., Jimenez, M., Simón, J. A., & Tornero-Aguilera, J. F. (2021). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social, Health, and Economy. Sustainability, 13(11), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116314.
• Dmytrów, K., & Bieszk-Stolorz, B. (2021). Comparison of changes in the labour markets of postcommunist countries with other EU member states. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(4), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.027.
• Domšić, L., Franić, B., & Perić, M. (2021). Museums from Home: Digital Activities of Croatian Museums during the COVID-19 Disease Pandemic. Sociologija i prostor, 59(3), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.59.3.5.
• Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2001). Cluster analysis (5th edition). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470977811.
• Foo, J., & Witkowska, D. (2017). A Comparison of Global Financial Market Recovery after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 17(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/foli-2017-0009.
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (n.d. a). Statistics for the SDGs – global indicators. Retrieved March 21, 2023, from https://sdg.gov.pl/en/.
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (n.d. b). Statistics for the SDGs – national indicators. Retrieved March 21, 2023, from https://sdg.gov.pl/en/statistics_nat/.
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2022). Poland on the way to SDGs Environmentally sustainable development. https://raportsdg.stat.gov.pl/en/Raport_pdf/Report_SDG_2022.pdf.
• Hellwig, Z. (1969). On the Problem of Weighting in International Comparisons. Social science project on human resources indicators, study VII, 1–29. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000023413?posInSet=1&queryId=a3dac7a7-5a40-47c3-95a9-8503a8e1edbc.
• Hellwig, Z. (1972a). Approximative Methods of Selection of an Optimal Set of Predictors. Social science project on human resources indicators, study XVI, 1–33. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000023392.
• Hellwig, Z. (1972b). On Optimal Choice of Predictors. In: Z. Gostkowski (Ed.), Towards a System of Human Resources Indicators for Less Developed Countries (pp. 69–90). Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
• Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Methods and Applications. A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9.
• Jianu, E., Pîrvu, R., Axinte, G., Toma, O., Cojocaru, A. V., & Murtaza, F. (2021). EU Labor Market Inequalities and Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 13(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052675.
• Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F. (2020). factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra.
• Kostka, M. S. (2011). After Crisis? – The Only Way: Economics for Sustainable Development. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 6(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL2011.002.
• Kuc-Czarnecka, M., Markowicz, I., & Sompolska-Rzechuła, A. (2023). SDGs implementation, their synergies, and trade-offs in EU countries – Sensitivity analysis-based approach. Ecological Indicators, 146, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109888.
• MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: L. M. Le Cam, J. Neyman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability: vol. 1. Statistics (pp. 281–297). University of California Press.
• Pełka, M. (2019). Assessment of the Development of the European OECD Countries with the Application of Linear Ordering and Ensemble Clustering of Symbolic Data. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 19(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2019-0017.
• Piwowarski, M., Miłaszewicz, D., Łatuszyńska, M., Borawski, M., & Nermend, K. (2018). TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1683–1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.109.
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
• Radulović, M., & Kostić, M. (2021). Are EU Members’ Economies an ‘Engine’ of the EU Candidates’ Economies? Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 21(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2021-0018.
• Rocchi, L., Ricciolini, E., Massei, G., Paolotti, L., & Boggia, A. (2022). Towards the 2030 Agenda: Measuring the Progress of the European Union Countries through the SDGs Achievement Index. Sustainability, 14(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063563.
• Roszkowska, P., & Prorokowski, Ł. (2014). Model of Financial Crisis Contagion: A Survey-based Simulation by Means of the Modified Kaplan-Meier Survival Plots. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 13(1), 22–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2013-0006.
• Ružić, I., & Popek Biškupec, P. (2021). Assessment of the pandemic shock on the tourism sector – the case of Croatia. Tourism Challenges amid COVID-19, 6(1), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.52370/TISC21247IR.
• Škare, M., Soriano, D. R., & Porada-Rochon, M. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 163, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120469.
• Skvarciany, V., Lapinskaite, I., & Volskyte, G. (2021). Circular economy as assistance for sustainable development in OECD countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.001.
• Sombultawee, K., Lenuwat, P., Aleenajitpong, N., & Boon-itt, S. (2022). COVID-19 and Supply Chain Management: A Review with Bibliometric. Sustainability, 14(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063538.
• Stanickova, M. (2017). Can the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals be efficient? The challenge for achieving social equality in the European Union. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i3.20.
• Stanujkic, D., Popovic, G., Zavadskas, E. K., Karabasevic, D., & Binkyte-Veliene, A. (2020). Assessment of Progress towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals of the ‘Agenda 2030’ by Using the CoCoSo and the Shannon Entropy Methods: The Case of the EU Countries. Sustainability, 12(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145717.
• United Nations. (n.d.). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved September 30, 2022, from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
• United Nations. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/.
• Walesiak, M., & Dudek, A. (2020). The Choice of Variable Normalization Method in Cluster Analysis. In: K. S. Soliman (Ed.), Education Excellence and Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision to Sustain Economic Development during Global Challenges (pp. 325–340). International Business Information Management Association.
• Zioło, M., Bąk, I., & Cheba, K. (2021). The role of sustainable finance in achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Does it work?. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.13863.
• Zioło, M., Filipiak, B. Z., Bąk, I., Cheba, K., Tîrca, D. M., & Novo-Corti, I. (2019). Finance, Sustainability and Negative Externalities. An Overview of the European Context. Sustainability, 11(15), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154249.

Identifiers

DOI

10.59139/ws.2023.03.2

Biblioteka Nauki

2211412