Efficient estimation of population mean in the presence of non-response and measurement error

• Authors: Kuldeep Kumar Tiwari , Vishwantra Sharma

Abstracts

EN

In real-world surveys, non-response and measurement errors are common, therefore studying them together seems rational. Some population mean estimators are modified and studied in the presence of non-response and measurement errors. Bias and mean squared error expressions are derived under different cases. For all estimators, a theoretical comparison is made with the sample mean per unit estimator. The Monte-Carlo simulation is used to present a detailed picture of all estimators' performance.

Keywords

EN

non-response; measurement error; mean squared error; efficiency; mean estimation

• Publisher: Główny Urząd Statystyczny
• Journal: Statistics in Transition new series
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 24
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 95-116

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Kuldeep Kumar Tiwari

• Department of Mathematics, Chandigarh University

• https://orcid.org/0000000150831206

author

Vishwantra Sharma

• Directorate of Census Operations, Jammu and Kashmir

• https://orcid.org/0000000173870670

References

• Azeem, M., Hanif, M., (2016). Joint influence of measurement error and non-response on estimation of population mean. Commun Statist. Theory Methods, 14(1), 12. DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2015.1026992.
• Bahl, S., Tuteja, R. K., (1991). Ratio and product type exponential estimators. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 12, pp. 159–164.
• Cochran,W. G., (1940). The estimation of the yields of cereal experiments by sampling for the ratio gain to total produce. J. Agric. Soc., 30, pp. 262-–275.
• Cochran, W. G., (1977). Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.
• Diane, G., Giordan, M., (2012). Finite population variance estimation in presence of measurement errors. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 41(23), pp. 4302–4314. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2011.573165.
• Fuller, W. A., (1987), Measurement Error Models, New York: Wiley.
• Gregoire, T. G., Salas, C., (2009). Ratio estimation with measurement error in the auxiliary variate. Biometrics, 65(2), 590-598. DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01110.x.
• Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., (1946). The problem of non-response in sample surveys. J Amer Statist Assoc, 41, pp. 517–529.
• Kumar, S., Bhougal, S., Nataraja, N. S., (2015). Estimation of population mean in the presence of non-response and measurement error. Revista Colombiana de Estadistica, 38(1), pp. 145-–61. DOI:10.15446/rce.v38n1.48807.
• Kumar, S., Bhougal, S., (2018). Study on Non Response and Measurement Error using Double Sampling Scheme. J. Stat. Appl. Pro. Lett., 5(1), pp. 43–52.
• Kreuter, F., Olson, K., Wagner, J., et al., (2010). Using proxy measure and correlates of survey outcomes to adjust for non-response-examples from multiple surveys. J Royal Statist Soc Ser A, 173(3), pp. 1–21.
• Khan, M., Shabbir, J., Hussain, Z., et al., (2014). A Class of Estimators for Finite Population Mean in Double Sampling under Nonresponse Using Fractional Raw Moments. Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/282065.
• Kadilar, C., Cingi, H., (2004). Ratio estimators in simple random sampling. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 151(3), pp. 893-902. DOI 10.1080/03610926.2019.1682167.
• Khare, B. B., Sinha, R. R., (2019). Estimation of product of two population means by multi-auxiliary characters under double sampling the non-respondent. STATISTICS IN TRANSITION new series, 20(3), pp. 81-95. DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2019-025.
• Khare, B. B., Srivastava, S., (1993). Estimation of population mean using auxiliary character in presence of non-response. National Academy of Science and Letters, India, 16(3), pp. 111–114.
• Luengo, A. V. G., (2016). Ratio-cum-product estimation in presence of non-response in successive sampling. JAMSI, 12(1), pp. 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/jamsi-2016-0005.
• Murthy, M. N., (1964). Product method of estimation. Sankhya A, 26, pp. 69-74.
• Okafor, F. C., Lee, H., (2000). Double sampling for ratio and regression estimation with sub-sampling the non-respondents. Survey Methodology, 26, pp. 183-188.
• Pandey, A. K., Usman, M., Singh, G. N., (2021). Optimality of ratio and regression type estimators using dual of auxiliary variable under non response, Alexandria Engineer ing Journal, 60(5), pp. 4461–4471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.031.
• Rao, P. S. R. S., (1986). Ratio estimation with sub-sampling the non-respondents. Survey Methodology, 12, pp. 217–230.
• Rao, T. J., (1991). On certain methods of improving ratio and regression estimators, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 20(10), pp. 3325–3340.
• Sharma, V., Kumar, S., (2020). Estimation of population mean using transformed auxiliary variable and non-response. Revista Investigacio Operacional, 41(3), pp. 438–444.
• Sinha, R. R., Dhingra, H., Thakur, P., (2022). Estimation of Ratio of Two Means Using Regression-Cum-Exponential Estimators in the Presence of Non-response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci., 92, pp. 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010- 020-00690-0.
• Shalabh., (1997). Ratio method of estimation in the presence of measurement errors, Indian Journal of Agricultural Statistics, 50(2), pp. 150–155.
• Srivastava, A. K., Shalabh., (2001). Effect of measurement errors on the regression method of estimation in survey sampling. Journal of Statistical Research, 35(2), pp. 35–44.
• Singh, R. S., Sharma, P., (2015). Method of Estimation in the Presence of Non-response and Measurement Errors Simultaneously. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), pp. 107-121. DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1430453460.
• Singh, P., Singh, R., Bouza, C. N., (2018). Effect of measurement error and non-response on estimation of population mean. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 39(1), pp. 108– 120.
• Searls, D. T., (1964). The Utilization of a Known Coefficient of Variation in the Estimation Procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, pp. 1225–1226.
• Srivastava, S. K., (1967). An estimator using auxiliary information in sample surveys, Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 16, pp. 121-–132.
• Singh, H. P., Espejo, M. R., (2003). On Linear Regression and Ratio-product Estimation of a Finite Population Mean. The StatistiSingh, H. P. and Espejo, M. R.cian, 52(1), pp. 59–67.
• Tiwari, K. K., Bhougal, S., Kumar, S., Rather, K. U. I., (2022). Using Randomized Response to Estimate the Population Mean of a Sensitive Variable under the Influence of Measurement Error. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 16(2), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-022-00251-1.
• Tiwari, K. K., Bhougal, S., Kumar, S., Onyango, R., (2022). Assessing the Effect of Nonresponse and Measurement Error Using a Novel Class of Efficient Estimators. Journal of Mathematics, Article ID 4946265. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4946265.
• Tiwari, K. K., Bhougal, S., Kumar, S., (2023). A General Class of Estimators in the Presence of Non-response and Measurement Error, Journal of Statistics Application & Probability Letters, 10(1), pp. 13-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/jsapl/100102.
• Zahid, E., Shabbir, J., Gupta, S., Onyango, R., Saeed, S., (2022). A generalized class of estimators for sensitive variable in the presence of measurement error and non-response. PLoS ONE 17(1), e0261561. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. Pone.0261561.

Identifiers

DOI

10.59170/stattrans-2023-038

Biblioteka Nauki

18105157