Konsekwencje aktywizacji kategorii związanych z władzą i pieniędzmi

• Authors: Anna Olga Kuźmińska

Title variants

EN

The consequences of activation of categories associated with power and money

Abstracts

EN

An article discusses the use of activation in experimental psychological research, focusing on the categories associated with power and money. It further addresses the issue of potential chronic power and money activation by relating to the observable differences between students of management and economics and those of other disciplines. Results of the study conducted on the students of three Warsaw high schools are presented (N = 134), suggesting that the abovementioned differences stem from self-selection rather than socialization.

PL

Artykuł powstał w ramach realizacji projektu badawczego o nr 2012/07/N/HS6/02252 finansowanego ze środków Narodowego Centrum Nauki. Omawia on wykorzystanie aktywizacji w eksperymentach psychologicznych, skupiając się na kategoriach związanych z władzą i pieniędzmi. Odnosi się ponadto do obserwowanych w wielu badaniach różnic pomiędzy studentami zarządzania i ekonomii oraz innych kierunków, wyjaśniając je jako potencjalne skutki chronicznej aktywizacji kategorii władzy i pieniędzy. Prezentowane są wyniki badań przeprowadzonych na uczniach warszawskich szkół średnich (N = 134) sugerujące, że wspomniane różnice pomiędzy studentami wynikają z samoselekcji raczej niż socjalizacji.

Keywords

EN

aktywizacja,; władza,; idea pieniędzy,; zarządzanie,; ekonomia; activation,; power,; idea of money,; management,; economics

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 1/2014 (45)
• Pages: 66-80

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Anna Olga Kuźmińska

• Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Zarządzania

References

• Ahmed, A. (2008). Can Education Affect Pro-social Behavior? Cops, Economists and Humanists in Social Dilemmas. International Journal of Social Economics, 35 (4), 298–307, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068290810854565.
• Aronson, E., Wieczorkowska, G. (2001). Kontrola naszych myśli i uczuć. Warszawa: Santorski. Aspen Institute. (2001). Where will they lead? MBA student attitudes about business and society. New York: Aspen Institute for Social Innovation Through Business.
• Baird, J. i Zelin, R. (2007). Personal Values and Ethical Viewpoints of Accounting Majors? Journal of Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Issues, 10, 39–54.
• Baron, R.M. i Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical
• Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
• Baryła, W. (2013). Pieniądze w umyśle. Jak myślenie o pieniądzach wpływa na motywację. Sopot: SmakSłowa.
• Bauman, Y. i Rose, E. (2011). Selection or Indoctrination: Why Do Economics Students Donate Less than the Rest? Journal of Economic Behavior and
• Organization, 79 (3), 318–327, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.010.
• Brouthers, L.E., Lascu, D.-N. i Werne, S. (2008). Competitive Irrationality in Transitional Economies: Are Communist Managers Less Irrational? Journal of
• Business Ethics, 83, 397–408, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9627-6.
• Cunningham, P.H., Frauman, E., Ivy, M.I. i Perry T.L. (2004). The Value of Money and Leisure and College Student’s Choice of Major. A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 19, 65–72.
• DeVoe, S.E. i Pfeffer, J. (2007). When Time is Money: The Effect of Hourly Payment on the Evaluation of Time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 1–13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.003.
• Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. i Sutton, R.I. (2005). Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30 (1), 8–24, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.15281412.
• Fiske, S.T. (1993). Controlling Other People: The Impact of Power on Stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48 (6), 621–628, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.48.6.621.
• Frank, B. i Schulze, G.G. (2000). Does Economics Make Citizens Corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 101–113,
• Frank, R.H., Gilovich, T. i Regan, D.T. (1993). Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (2), 159–171, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.2.159.
• Frey, B.S. i Meier, S. (2003). Are Political Economists Selfish and Indoctrinated? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Economic Inquiry, 41, 448–462, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbg020.
• Frieze, I.H. i Boneva, B.S. (2009). Motywacja do sprawowania władzy a motywacja do pomagania innym. W: A.Y. Lee-Chai i J.A. Bargh (red.), Władza. Pokusy i zagrożenia, (s. 75–93). Gdańsk: GWP.
• Galinsky, A.D., Gruenfeld, D.H. i Magee, J.C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453.
• Galinsky, A.D., Magee, J.C., Inesi, M.E. i Gruenfeld, D.H. (2006). Power and Perspectives Not Taken. Psychological Science, 17 (12), 1068–1074, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x.
• Gąsiorowska, A., Zaleś kiewicz, T. i Wygrab, S. (2012). Would You Do Something for Me? The Effects of Money Activation on Social Preferences and Social
• Behavior in young Children. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 603–608.
• Gonzaga, G.C., Keltner, D. i Ward, D. (2008). Power in Mixed-sex Stranger Interactions. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1555–1568, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930801921008.
• Grubisic, D. i Goic, S. (1998). Attitudes towards Some Aspects of Business Ethics among Students from Countries in Transition: An Empirical Research.
• Business Ethics, 7 (3), 163–177, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00102.
• Gruenfeld, D.H., Inesi, M.E., Magee, J.C. i Galinsky, A.D. (2008). Power and the Objectification of Social Targets. Journal of Personality and Social
• Psychology, 95, 111–127, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.95.1.111.
• Grusec, J. i Hastings, P.D. (2006). Handbook of Socialization. New York: Guilford Press.
• Harpaz, I. (1990). The Importance of Work Goals: An International Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 21 (1), 75–93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490328.
• Hawkins, D.I. i Cocanougher, A.B. (1972). Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education. Journal of
• Marketing, 36 (2), 61–64, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1250980.
• Iida, Y. i Oda, S.H. (2011). Does Economics Education Make Bad Citizens? The Effect of Economics Education in Japan. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 234–239, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.511303.
• Kahneman, D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
• Kay, A.C., Wheeler, S.C, Bargh, J.A. i Ross, L. (2004). Material Priming: The Influence of Mundane Physical Objects on Situational Construal and
• Competitive Behavioral Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95 (1), 83–96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.06.003.
• Kipnis, D. (1972). Does Power Corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33–41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033390.
• Laband, D.N. i Beil, R.O. (1999). Are Economists More Selfish than Other ‘Social’ Scientists? Public Choice, 100 (1/2), 85–101.
• Lammers, J., Stapel, D.A. i Galinsky, A.D. (2010). Power Increases Hypocrisy: Moralizing in Reasoning, Immorality in Behavior. Psychological Science, 21 (5), 737–744, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368810.
• Lee-Chai, A.Y., Chen, S. i Chartrand, T.L. (2009). Od Mojżesza do Marcosa. Różnice indywidualne dotyczące wykorzystywania i nadużywania władzy. W: A.Y.
• Lee-Chai i J.A. Bargh (red.), Władza. Pokusy i zagrożenia (s. 75–93). Gdańsk: GWP.
• Magee, J.C., Galinsky, A.D. i Gruenfeld, D.H. (2007). Power, Propensity to Negotiate, and Moving First in Competitive Interactions. Personality and
• Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 200–212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294413.
• Marwell, G. i Ames, R. (1981). Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15 (3), 295–310, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(81)90013-X.
• McCabe, D.L., Butterfield, K. i Trevino, L.K. (2006). Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5 (3), 294–305, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2006.22697018.
• McCabe, D.L., Dukerich, J. i Dutton, J. (1991). Context, Values and Moral Dilemmas: Comparing the Choices of Business and Law School Students. Journal of
• Business Ethics, 10, 951–960, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00383799.
• McCabe, D.L. i Trevino, L.K. (1996). What We Know about Cheating in College: Longitudinal Trends and Recent Developments. Change, 28, 29–33.
• Nill, A., Schibrowsky, J. i Peltier, J. (2004). The Impact of Competitive Pressure on Students’ Ethical Decision-Making in a Global Setting. Marketing Education Review, 14, 1–13.
• Pfeffer, J. i DeVoe, S.E. (2009). Economic Evaluation: The Effect of Money and Economics on Attitudes about Volunteering. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 500–508, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1245262.
• Rubinstein, A. (2006). A Sceptics Comment on the Study of Economics. The Economic Journal, 116, C1–C9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01071.x.
• Segal, L., Gideon, L. i Haberfeld, M.R. (2011). Comparing the Ethical Attitudes of Business and Criminal Justice Students. Social Science Quarterly, 92
• (4), 1021–1043, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00801.x
• Seguino, S., Stevens, T. i Lutz, M.A. (1996). Gender and Cooperative Behavior: Economic Man Rides Alone. Feminist Economics, 2 (1), 1–21.
• Selten, R. i Ockenfels, A. (1998). An Experimental Solidarity Game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 517–539, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-26 81(97)00107-8.
• Sims Jr., H.P. i Hegarty, W.H. (1977). Policies, Objectives, and Ethical Behavior: An Experiment. Academy of Management Proceedings, (Meeting Abstract Supplement), 295–299, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.1977.4977605.
• Smith, P.K. i Bargh, J.A. (2008). Nonconscious Effects of Power on Basic Approach and Avoidance Tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24, http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.1.
• Tang, T.L. i Chen, Y.-J. (2008). Intelligence Vs. Wisdom: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, and Unethical Behavior across College Major and Gender.
• Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 1–26, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9559-1.
• Tang, T.L., Chen, Y.-J. i Sutarso, T. (2008). Bad Apples in Bad (Business) Barrels: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, Risk Tolerance, and Unethical Behavior. Management Decision, 46, 243–263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740810854140.
• Vohs, K.D., Mead, N.L. i Goode, M.R. (2006). The Psychological Consequences of Money. Science, 314, 1154–1156, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1132491.
• Vohs, K.D., Mead, N.L. i Goode, M.R. (2008). Merely Activating the Concept of Money Changes Personal and Interpersonal Behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17 (3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00576.x s. 208–212.
• Wieczorkowska-Wierzbińska, G. (2011). Psychologiczne ograniczenia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania UW.
• Wieczorkowska-Wierzbińska, G. i Kuźmińska, A. (2012). Zmieniona osobowość menedżerów. W: K. Klincewicz i W. Grzywacz (red.), Rozwój potencjału społecznego organizacji – wyzwania w XXI wieku. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania UW.
• Williams, R.J., Barrett, J.D. i Brabston, M. (2000). Managers’ Business School Education and Military Service: Possible Links to Corporate Criminal Activity. Human Relations, 53, 691–712, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726700535004.
• Yezer, A., Goldfarb, R. i Poppen, P. (1996). Does Studying Economics Discourage Cooperation? Watch What We Do, Not What We Say or How We Play. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (1), 177–186, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.1.177.
• Zhou, X., Vohs, K.D. i Baumeister, R.F. (2009). The Symbolic Power of Money: Reminders of Money Alter Social Distress and Physical Pain. Psychological Science, 20, 700–706, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02353.x.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.45.5

Biblioteka Nauki

525526