Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 4/2014 (48) t.1 |

Article title

The analytical framework for identifying and benchmarking systemically important financial institutions in Europe

Content

Title variants

PL
Identyfikacja i analiza porównawcza instytucji systemowo ważnych w Europie

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Mając na uwadze kryteria klasyfikacji banków systemowo ważnych (tzw. SIFI), celem artykułu jest identyfikacja największych banków w skali europejskiej oraz wskazanie na charakter podejmowanego przez nie ryzyka o charakterze systemowym. Badanie zostało przeprowadzone na podstawie sprawozdań finansowych 36 największych banków komercyjnych w Europie. Analizie zostały poddane wskaźniki ryzyka o charakterze systemowym, tj. dźwignia finansowa, płynność, wskaźnik kapitałowy, jakości aktywów, oraz rentowność banków. Uzyskane wyniki pokazały, że na tle wartości średnich dla całej Europy wskaźniki ryzyka największych banków (tzw. SIFI) pozostają na zbliżonym poziomie.
EN
The aim of this article is to identify systemically important banks on a European scale, according the criteria proposed by supervisory authorities. In this study, we discuss the analytical framework for identifying and benchmarking systemically important financial institutions. We selected a group of 36 largest banks in Europe and analyzed their risk indicators, i.e.: leverage, liquidity, capital ratio, asset quality and profitability, as a source of systemic risk. The aim of the study is to find out whether the size of an institution generates higher systemic risk. We find that risk indicators of excessive debt, liquidity, capital adequacy and effectiveness for the largest commercial banks in Europe do not differ from the average across Europe.

Year

Physical description

Dates

published
2014

Contributors

  • University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management

References

  • Acharya, V.V. and Richardson, M. (2009). Restoring Financial Stability. How to Repair a Failed System. New Jersey: Wiley Finance.
  • BIS. (2011). Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement. Rules text. Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. November 2011.
  • BIS. (2013). Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. January.
  • Brunnermeier, M. et al. (2009). The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation.
  • Geneva Reports on the World Economy, 11. Geneva: International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies.
  • Cihák, M., Muñoz, S. and Scuzzarella, R. (2011). The Bright and the Dark Side of Cross-Border Banking Linkages. IMF Working Paper No. 11/186.
  • Cornett, M., McNutt, J., Strahan, P. and Tehranian, H. (2010). Liquidity Risk management and Credit Supply in the Financial Crisis. Working Paper.
  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Huizinga, H, (2011). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. CEPR Discussion Papers, 8276.
  • EMEA, Centre for regulatory and Strategy. Addressing the risk posed by systematically important banks? The end of too big to fail? Deloitte Report 2014.
  • European Commission. (2012). EU framework for bank recovery and resolution. June. Financial Stability Board. (2012). Resolution of Systemically Important Financial Institutions.
  • FSB, IMF, BIS. (2009). Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instruments: Initial Considerations. Report to G20 Finance
  • Ministers and Governors, Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements. October.
  • Karkowska, R. (2013). Czy rynek repo może stać się przyczyną kolejnego kryzysu?, Prace i Materiały Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  • Erkki, L. (2012). High level Expert Group on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector. Bank of Finland. October.
  • Mayer, T., Möbert, J. and Weistroffer, Ch. (2010). Macroeconomic imbalances and the Eurosystem. Global Economic Perspectives. Deutsche Bank. June 2011.
  • Weistroffer Ch. (2011). Identifying systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs). Deutsche Bank Research.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
525862

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_7172_1644-9584_48_2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.