Wykorzystanie metodologii teorii ugruntowanej w badaniach z zakresu ZZL w sektorze prywatnym i publicznym – próba metaanalizy artykułów opublikowanych w latach 2010–2014 na tzw. liście filadelfijskiej

• Authors: Katarzyna Susabowska

Title variants

EN

Application of the Grounded Theory Methodology in HRM Research Within Private and Public Sector – An Attempt at a Meta-Analysis of Articles Published on the ISI Master Journal List Between 2010 and 2014

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the study is to assess the cognitive value of research results presented in the articles concerning HRM in which the grounded theory methodology was used. The article puts forward the meta-analysis as a tool for comparing the results of previous empirical research published during the period of the last five years (2010–2014) on the ISI Master Journal List. I hope that my research will add to debates on issues of HRM within the private and public sector.

PL

Celem opracowania jest określenie wartości poznawczej wyników badań prezentowanych w artykułach poświęconych zagadnieniom ZZL, w których posłużono się metodologią teorii ugruntowanej. Dzięki wykorzystaniu metaanalizy możliwe będzie porównanie wyników badań empirycznych, publikowanych na przestrzeni ostatnich pięciu lat (2010–2014) w periodykach z tzw. listy filadelfijskiej, poświęconych zagadnieniom zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi w organizacjach działających zarówno w sektorze prywatnym, jak i publicznym.

Keywords

EN

methodology; grounded theory; meta-analysis; ISI Master Journal List; HRM

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 3/2016 (61), t.1
• Pages: 167-190

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Susabowska

• University of Economics in Katowice

References

• Abbas, S., Khattak, Z.Z. & Nocker, M. (2014). Trading loyalities: exploring the nature of organisational commitment among male and female employees in Pakistani banking sector. Gomal University Journal of Research, 30(2), 33–41.
• Åge, L.J. (2011). Grounded Theory Methodology: Positivism, Hermeneutics, and Pragmatism. The Qualitative Report, 16(6), 1599–1615. Ari stotle (2013). Kategorie. Analityki pierwsze. Analityki wtóre (translated by K. Leśniak). Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Austi n, R.D., Devin, L. & Sullivan, E.E. (2012). Accidental Innovation: Supporting Valuable Unpredictability in the Creative Process. Organization Science, 23(5), 1505–1522, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0681.
• Bachar ach, S.B., Bamberger, P. & McKinney, V. (2000). Boundary Management Tactics and Logics of Action: The Case of Peer-Support Providers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 704–736.
• Bamber ger, P. & Phillips, B. (1991). Organizational Environment and Business Strategy: Parallel Versus Conflicting Influences on Human Resource Strategy in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 153–182.
• Beck, T.E. & Plowman, D.A. (2014). Temporary, Emergent Interorganizational Collaboration in Unexpected Circumstances: A Study of the Columbia Space Shuttle Response Effort. Organization Science, 25(4), 1234–1252, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0888.
• Bensao u, B.M., Galunic, C. & Jonczyk-Sédès, C. (2014). Players and Purists: Networking Strategies and Agency of Service Professionals. Organization Science, 25(1), 29–56, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0826.
• Berente, N., Hansen, S., Pike, J.C. & Bateman, P.J. (2011). Arguing the value of virtual worlds: patterns of discursive sensemaking of an innovative technology. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 685–709.
• Bloom, M ., Milkovich, G.T. & Mitra, A. (2003). International compensation: learning from how managers respond to variations in local host contexts. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(8), 1350–1367.
• Burgelma n, R.A. (2011). Bridging history and reductionism: A key role for longitudinal qualitative research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 591–601, 10.1057/jibs.2011.12.
• Charmaz, K. (2009). Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej (translated by B. Komorowska). Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Clardy, A . (2000). Learning on Their Own: Vocationally Oriented Self-Directed Learning Projects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(2), 105–125.
• Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576.
• Collins, D . (1995). A Socio-Political Theory of Workplace Democracy: Class Conflict, Constituent Reactions and Organizational Outcomes at a Gainsharing Facility. Organization Science, 6(6), 628–644.
• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
• Corley, K. G. & Gioia, D.A. (2011). Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.
• Dougherty, D. & Dunne, D.D. (2012). Digital Science and Knowledge Boundaries in Complex Innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1467–1484, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0700.
• Fischlmayr , I.C. & Kollinger, I. (2010). Work-life balance – a neglected issue among Austrian female expatriates. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(4), 455–487, 10.1080/09585191003611978.
• Gibbs, G. (2011). Analizowanie danych jakościowych. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Gioia, D.A ., Corley, K.G. & Hamilton, A.L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31, 10.1177/1094428112452151.
• Glaser, B. ( 1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
• Glaser, B. & Holton, J. (2010). Remodelowanie teorii ugruntowanej. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 6(2).
• Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
• Glass, G.V. ( 1976). Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Review of Research in Education, 5(10), 3–8.
• Gligor, D.M. & Autry, C.W. (2012). The role of personal relationships in facilitating supply chain communications: a qualitative study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(1), 24–43, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03240.x.
• Gondek, A.,& Mazur, K. (2013). Metodyka metaanalizy w naukach o zarządzaniu. In: W. Czakon (ed.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu (pp. 68–91). Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer.
• Gregory, R.W., Bec k, R. & Keil, M. (2013). Control balancing in information systems development offshoring projects. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1211–1214.
• Gupta, R., Banerjee , P. & Gaur, J. (2012). Exploring the role of the spouse in expatriate failure: a grounded theory-based investigation of expatriate’ spouse adjustment issues from India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(17), 3559–3577, 10.1080/09585192.2011.645052.
• Hałas, E. (2006). I nterakcjonizm symboliczny. Społeczny kontekst znaczeń. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Harrison, P. (2011). L earning Culture, Line Manager and HR Professional Practice. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(9), 914–928.
• Hausman, W.H., Lee, H. L., Napier, G.R.F., Thompson, A. & Zheng, Y. (2010). A process analysis of global trade management: an inductive approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 5–29, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03187.x.
• Hinds, P.J. & Cramton , C.D. (2014). Situated Coworker Familiarity: How Site Visits Transform Relationships Among Distributed Workers. Organization Science, 25(3), 794–814, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0869.
• Huang, J. & Hyun Jeong , K. (2011). Conceptualizing the processes, benefits, and challenges of organizational lifelong learning at Yuhan-Kimberly, Korea: the notion of anticipative affordance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1423–1441, 10.1080/09585192.2011.561958.
• Kaufmann, L. & Denk, N . (2011). How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(4), 64–72, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03246.x.
• Ketchen, D.J., Wowak, K.D. & Craighead, C.W. (2014). Resource Gaps and Resource Orchestration Shortfalls in Supply Chain Management: The Case of Product Recalls. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 6–15, 10.1111/jscm.12047.
• Kleka, P. (2011). Statys tyczne kryteria przydatności raportu z badań do metaanalizy. In: J. M. Brzeziński (ed.), Metodologia badań społecznych. Wybór tekstów (pp. 99–114). Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
• Kołtun, A. (2011). Interview with p rof. Krzysztof T. Konecki. Posmak kontestacji – o recepcji teorii ugruntowanej w Polsce. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 7(3).
• Konecki, K. (1998). Łowcy Głów. Analiza pracy rekrutacyjnej w agencjach doradztwa personalnego. Warszawa: Alfa-Wero.
• Konecki, K. (2000). Studia z metodologii ba dań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Kuhn, T.S. (1985). Dwa bieguny. Tradycja i no watorstwo w badaniach naukowych. Warszawa: PIW.
• Kuhn, T.S. (2009). Struktura rewolucji naukow ych (translated by H. Ostromęcka). Warszawa: Aletheia.
• Kulinskaya, E., Morgenthaler, S. & Staudte, R. G. (2008). Meta Analysis. A Guide to Calibrating and Combining Statistical Evidence. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• Ladge, J.J., Clair, J.A. & Greenberg, D. (20 12). Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: constructing multiple selves as professional and mother during pregnancy. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1449–1471, 10.5465/amj.2010.0538.
• Lakatos, I. (1995). Falsyfikacja a metodologia naukowych programów badawczych. In: I. Lakatos (ed.), Pisma z filozofii nauk empirycznych. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Lloyd, S., Roodt, G. & Odendaal, A. (2011). Cri tical elements in defining work-based identity in a post-apartheid South Africa. SAJIP: South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(1), 53–67, 10.4102/sajip.v37i1.894.
• Lockström, M., Schadel, J., Harrison, N., Moser, R. & Malhotra, M.K. (2010). Antecedents to supplier integration in the automotive industry: A multiple case study of foreign subsidiaries in China. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 240–256, 10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.004.
• Loonam, J. (2013). Towards a Grounded Theory Meth odology: Reflections for Management Scholars. Irish Journal of Management, 33(1), 49–72.
• Mair, J. & Hehenberger, L. (2014). Front-stage a nd backstage convening: the transition from opposition to mutualistic coexistence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1174–1200, 10.5465/amj.2012.0305.
• Mantere, S., Schildt, H.A. & A. Sillince, J.A. (2012). Reversal of strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 173–196, 10.5465/amj.2008.0045.
• Margolis, J.D. & Molinsky, A. (2008). Navigatin g the bind of necessary evils: psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 847–872, 10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789639.
• Martin, J.A. (2011). Dynamic Managerial Capabili ties and the Multibusiness Team: The Role of Episodic Teams in Executive Leadership Groups. Organization Science, 22, 118–140, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0515.
• Masaru, Y. (2006). Boundaryless career and adapti ve HR practices in Japan’s hotel industry. Career Development International, 11(3), 230–242.
• O’Brien, E. & Linehan, C. (2014). A Balancing Ac t: Emotional Challenges in the HR Role. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1257–1285, 10.1111/joms.12098.
• O’Reilly, K., Paper, D. & Marx, S. (2012). Demys tifying Grounded Theory for Business Research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 247–262, 10.1177/1094428111434559.
• Powell, E.E. & Baker, T.E.D. (2014). It’s wha t you make of it: founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1406–1433, 10.5465/amj.2012.0454.
• Reis, R., Schwedler, M. v. & Oates, C. (2012). G rounded Theory in Practice Human Resource Development Research and Practice Across Europe. The Future of HRD – 2020 and beyond: challenges and opportunities (ss. 110–117). Vila Nova de Famalicão: UF HRD.
• Salvador, F. (2011). On the importance of good que stions and empirically grounded theorizing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(4), 21–22, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03248.x.
• Sauerbrei, W. & Blettner, M. (2003). Issues of tr aditional reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in medical research. In: R. Schulze, H. Holling & D. Böhning (eds), Meta-analysis: new development and applications in medical and social science. München: Hogrefe & Huber.
• Seidel, S. & Urquhart, C. (2013). On emergence and forcing in information systems grounded theory studies: the case of Strauss and Corbin. Journal of Information Technology (Palgrave Macmillan), 28(3), 237–260, 10.1057/jit.2013.17.
• Shepherd, D.A. & Williams, T.A. (2014). Local Ven turing as Compassion Organizing in the Aftermath of a Natural Disaster: The Role of Localness and Community in Reducing Suffering. Journal of Management Studies, 51(6), 952–994, 10.1111/joms.12084.
• Silverman, D. (2009). Prowadzenie badań jakościowych. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Skilton, P.F. (2011). Getting the reader to ‚I get it!’ : clarification, differentiation and illustration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 22–28, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03222.x.
• Stincelli, E. & Baghurst, T. (2014). A Grounded Theory E xploration of Informal Leadership Qualities as Perceived by Employees and Managers in Small Organizations. International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research, 5(1), 1–8.
• Suddaby, R. (2006). From the Editors: what Grounded Theor y is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642, 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083020.
• Sułkowski, Ł. (2006). O potrzebie niefundamentalistyczneg o dyskursu w epistemologii zarządzania. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 1(123), 53–65.
• Susabowska, K. (2011). Teoria ugruntowana a (polska) socjolog ia. Czy rewolucja? In: R. Osika (ed.), Bunt i reforma (pp. 305–316). Kraków: Homini.
• Thorpe, A.S. (2014). Doing the Right Thing or Doing the Thing Right: Implications of Participant Withdrawal. Organizational Research Methods, 17(3), 255–277, 10.1177/1094428114524828.
• Trefalt, Š. (2013). Between you and me: setting work-nonwork b oundaries in the context of workplace relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1802–1829,10.5465/amj.2011.0298.
• Treviño, L.K., den Nieuwenboer, N.A., Kreiner, G.E. & Bish op, D.G. (2014). Legitimating the legitimate: A grounded theory study of legitimacy work among Ethics and Compliance Officers. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 186–205, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.009.
• Turner, J.H. (2005). Struktura teorii socjologicznej (translat ed by J. Szmatka). Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Urquhart, C. & Fernández, W. (2013). Using grounded theory met hod in information systems: the researcher as blank slate and other myths. Journal of Information Technology, 28(3), 224–236, 10.1057/jit.2012.34.
• Valenta, M. & Strabac, Z. (2011). State-assisted integration, b ut not for all: Norwegian welfare services and labour migration from the new EU member states. International Social Work, 54(5), 663–680, 10.1177/0020872810392811.
• Vashdi, D.R., Bamberger, P.A., Erez, M. & Weiss-Meilik, A. (2 007). Briefing-debriefing: Using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams. Human Resource Management, 46(1), 115–142.
• Voss, G.B., Cable, D.M. & Voss, Z.G. (2000). Linking Organiz ational Values to Relationships with External Constituents: A Study of Nonprofit Professional Theatres. Organization Science, 11(3), 330–347.
• Wadham, H. & Warren, R.C. (2014). Telling Organizational Tales : The Extended Case Method in Practice. Organizational Research Methods, 17(1), 5–22, 10.1177/1094428113513619.
• Winter, R.P. & Jackson, B.A. (2014). Expanding the Younger Wo rker Employment Relationship: Insights From Values-Based Organizations. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 311–328, 10.1002/hrm.21600.
• Woolley, A.W. & Fuchs, E. (2011). Collective Intelligence in t he Organization of Science. Organization Science, 22(5), 1359–1367, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0648.
• Zieleniewski, J. (1976). Organizacja i zarządzanie. Warszawa: PWN .

Identifiers

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.61.10

Biblioteka Nauki

526067