Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 13 | 21 | 55-71

Article title

The Interaction Between Public and Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law: a Case Study of the Swedish Booking Cases

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

FR
Cet article examine l’application privée pour les infractions aux dispositions du droit de la concurrence menée dans l’affaire Visita contre Booking en ce qui concerne l’interaction avec l’application publique du droit de la concurrence. Cette affaire portait sur la question de déterminer si les clauses de la Nation la Plus Favorisée restrictives appliquées par Booking étaient contraires à l’article 101 du TFUE et pouvaient donc être interdites par un tribunal suédois. Le présent article est centré sur l’évaluation effectuée par les juridictions suédoises afin de déterminer si les clauses de la Nation la Plus Favorisée étaient restrictives de la concurrence par effet et sur le niveau de preuve attaché à cet égard. En ce qui concerne l’interaction entre l’application publique et privée, l’affaire Visita v. Booking est considérée comme une illustration de la complexité accrue de la politique de concurrence, en particulier lorsque des pratiques nouvelles sont en cause.
EN
This article studies the private enforcement conducted in Visita v Booking from the perspective of the interaction between public and private enforcement of competition law. This case concerned the question whether the narrow MFN clauses maintained by Booking were contrary to Article 101 TFEU and could therefore be prohibited by a Swedish court. The focus of this article is placed on the assessment carried out by the Swedish courts to determine whether the MFN clauses were restrictive of competition by effect and on the standard of proof attached to the claimant in this regard. With regard to the interaction between public and private enforcement, Visita v. Booking is viewed as an illustration of the increased complexity of competition policy, in particular were novel practices are at issue.

Year

Volume

13

Issue

21

Pages

55-71

Physical description

Dates

published
2020

References

  • Caccinelli, C., & Toledano, J. (2018). Assessing Anticompetitive Practices in Two-Sided Markets: the Booking.Com Cases. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 14(2), 193–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhy005
  • Colangelo, M. (2017). Parity Clauses and Competition Law in Digital Marketplaces: The Case of Online Hotel Booking. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2963503
  • Ezrachi, A. (2016). EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart
  • Geradin, D., & Petit, N. (2010). Judicial Review in European Union Competition Law: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1698342
  • Gippini-Fournier, E. (2010). The Elusive Standard of Proof in EU Competition Cases. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1433744&download=yes (04.07.2019)
  • Heuman, L. (2005). Bevisbörda och beviskrav i tvistemål. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
  • Hirst, N. (2019, June 13). EU’s vertical agreements review to include RPM, MFN, selective distribution, official says. MLex. Retrieved from: http://www.mlex.com/GlobalAntitrust/DetailView.aspx?cid=1100634&siteid=190&rdir=1 (04.07.2019).
  • Ibáñez Colomo, P., & Lamadrid, A. (2016). On the Notion of Restriction of Competition: What We Know and What We Don’t Know We Know. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2849831
  • Kalthoff, M., Pracht, S., & Jegminat, G. (2018). Wie Deutschlands Wettbewerbshüter Andreas Mundt die Digitalgiganten in den Griff bekommen will. FVW Magazin. Retrieved from: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Interviews/2018/180316_FVW_Magazin.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (04.07.2019)
  • Leslie, W. (2018). Online Booking Platforms, MFNs and the Vertical Block Exemption: The Need for Certainty. European Competition Law Review, 39(7)
  • Wahl, N. (2018). Recent Trends at the Court of Justice of the European Union. Concurrences: Revue Des Droits de La Concurrence, (4)

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2158939

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_7172_1689-9024_YARS_2020_13_21_2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.