Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 15 | 26 | 103-130

Article title

The Digital Markets Act between the EU Economic Constitutionalism and the EU Competition Policy

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

FR
La doctrine a déjà beaucoup écrit sur les implications pratiques de l’entrée en vigueur du Digital Markets Act, c’est pourquoi le présent article vise à ramener la discussion au niveau théorique, en essayant d’identifier les racines de cette proposition de règlement, a travers une analyse du contexte dans lequel il s’inscrit, des principes et valeurs de l’UE sur lesquels il repose, des objectifs qu’il entend poursuivre et des théories juridico-économiques qui le sous-tendent.
EN
Given that a lot has already been written by legal scholars on the practical implications that the entry into force of the Digital Markets Act will have, the present article intends to bring the discussion back to the theoretical level, trying to find out where the roots of this proposed regulation lie, with an analysis of the context in which it falls, the EU principles and values upon which it is based, the objectives it intends to pursue, and the legal-economic theories behind it.

Year

Volume

15

Issue

26

Pages

103-130

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

author
  • University of Naples “Federico II”

References

  • Akman P. (2022). Regulating Competition in Digital Platform Markets: A Critical Assessment of the Framework and Approach of the EU Digital Markets Act, in European Law Review, 47.
  • Arena A. (2014). The relationship between Antitrust and Regulation in the US and the EU: Can legal tradition account for the differences?, in Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 3, issue 2.
  • Bastianon S. (2013). La tutela dei privati e l’accesso alle informazioni riservate: recenti sviluppi, in Tesauro G., Concorrenza ed effettività della tutela giurisdizionale tra ordinamento dell’Unione europea e ordinamento italiano, Editoriale Scientifica, Naples.
  • Botta M. (2021). Sector Regulation of Digital Platforms in Europe: Uno, Nessuno e Centomila, in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 12, n. 7.
  • Bruzzone G. (2021). Verso il Digital Markets Act: obiettivi, strumenti e architettura istituzionale, in Rivista della regolazione dei mercati, 1/2021.
  • Carugati C. (2021). The Role of National Authorities in the Digital Markets Act.
  • Chin C. (2022). Breaking Down the Arguments for and against U.S. Antitrust Legislation.
  • Chirico F. (2021). Digital Markets Act: A Regulatory Perspective, in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 12, n. 7.
  • Coase R. (2006). Impresa, mercato e diritto, Il Mulino.
  • Dold M., Krieger T. (2021). (eds.), Ordoliberalism and European Economic Policy, Routledge.
  • Drexl J. (2011). The European Economic Constitution and Its Relevance to the Ordo-Liberal Model, in Revue internationale de droit économique, issue 4.
  • Eucken W. (1951). Das Problem der wirtschaftlichen Macht, in Walter Eucken, Unser Zeitalter der Mißerfolge. Fünf Vorträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik, Tübingen.
  • Eucken W. (2004). Grundsatze der Wirtschaftpolitik, 7th ed.
  • Franck J. U., Peitz M. (2021). Digital Platforms and the New 19a Tool in the German Competition Act, in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 12, n. 7.
  • Fratea C. (2015). Il private enforcement del diritto della concorrenza dell’Unione europea – Profili europei, internazionalprivatistici e interni, Naples.
  • Grégoire G., Miny X. (2022). (eds), The Idea of Economic Constitution in Europe, Genealogy and Overview.
  • Hien J., Joerges C. (2017). (eds.), Ordoliberalism, Law and the Rule of Economics, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Ibá ñ ez Colomo P. (2021). The Draft Digital Markets Act: A Legal and Institutional Analysis, in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 12, n. 7.
  • Ibá ñ ez Colomo P. (2020). What can competition law achieve in digital markets? An analysis of the reforms proposed.
  • Joerges C. (2016). The European Economic Constitution and its Transformation Through the Financial Crisis, in Patterson D., Södersten A. (eds), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law.
  • Komninos A. (2021). The Digital Markets Act and Private Enforcement: Proposals for an Optimal System of Enforcement, in Eleanor M. Fox Liber Amicorum, Antitrust Ambassador to the World, Concurrences.
  • Komninos A. (2022). The Digital Markets Act: How Does it Compare with Competition Law?.
  • Lamadrid de Pablo A., Bayó n Ferná ndez N. (2021). Why the Proposed DMA Might Be Illegal under Article 114 TFEU, and How to Fix It, in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 12, n. 7.
  • Larouche P., De Streel A. (2021). The European Digital Markets Act: A Revolution Grounded on Traditions, in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 12, n. 7.
  • Larouche P., Schinkel M.P. (2013). Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act, TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2013-020.
  • Lenaerts K., Van Nuffel P. (2005). Constitutional Law of the European Union, London.
  • Lo Surdo C. (2015). Programmi di leniency, accesso e divulgazione nel giudizio civile alla luce della Direttiva sul danno antitrust.
  • Manganelli A. (2021). Il regolamento Eu per i mercati digitali: ratio, criticità e prospettive di evoluzione, in Mercato Concorrenza Regole, 3/2021.
  • Manzini P. (2021). Equità e contendibilità nei mercati digitali: la proposta di Digital Market Act, in I Post di AISDUE, III, n. 2, Focus “Servizi e piattaforme digitali”.
  • Massa C. (2018). The disclosure of leniency Statements and other Evidence under directive 2014/104/EU: an Undue Prominence of Public Enforcement?, in Market and Competition Law Review, volume II, n. 1.
  • Massa C. (2017). The effects of decisions adopted by competition authorities in the framework of Directive 2014/104/EU: criticalities and future prospects, in Mastroianni R., Arena A. (eds), 60 years of EU competition law: stocktaking and future prospects, Editoriale Scientifica, Naples.
  • Menietti E. (2018). Il caso Cambridge Analytica, spiegato bene.
  • Monti G. (2021). The Digital Markets Act – Institutional Design and Suggestions for Improvement, TILEC Discussion Paper.
  • Nascimbene B. (2016). La vincolatività del provvedimento di condanna dell’Autorità garante successivamente alla direttiva sul private enforcement (Direttiva 2014/104/UE), 14/11/2016.
  • Nazzini R. (2015). The Binding effect of decisions by Competition Authorities in the European Union, in Italian Antitrust Review, vol. 2.
  • Pace L.F. (2005). I fondamenti del diritto antitrust europeo, Milan.
  • Pace L.F. (2019). Il principio dell’indipendenza della banca centrale e la stabilità dei prezzi come obiettivo della politica monetaria: quale influenza dell’ordoliberalismo in Germania e nell’Unione Europea?, in Moneta e Credito, vol. 72, n. 288.
  • Pace L.F. (2021). La natura giuridica dell’Unione europea: teorie a confronto, l’Unione ai tempi della pandemia, Bari.
  • Petit N. (2021). The Proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA): A Legal and Policy Review, in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 12, n. 7.
  • Poiares Maduro M. (2003). Europe and the Constitution: What if this is as Good as it Gets?, in J.H.H. Weiler, M. Wind (eds), European constitutionalism beyond the State, Cambridge.
  • Poiares Maduro M. (2012). Three Claims of constitutional Pluralism, in M. Avbelj, J. Komárek (eds) Constitutional pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Oxford.
  • Siragusa M. (2014). L’effetto delle decisioni delle autorità nazionali della concorrenza nei giudizi per il risarcimento del danno: la proposta della commissione e il suo impatto nell’ordinamento italiano, in Concorrenza e mercato.
  • Stigler G.J. (1957). Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated, in Journal of Political Economy, vol. 65, no. 1.
  • Svetlicinii A. (2021). China to discipline online platforms with antitrust enforcement?.
  • Trimarchi M. (2015). La divulgazione delle prove incluse nel fascicolo di un’autorità garante della concorrenza nella direttiva sull’antitrust private enforcement (direttiva 2014/104/UE), in AIDA.
  • Tuori K., Sankari S. (2016). The many Constitutions of Europe, London.
  • Von Bogdandy A. (2009). Principles of European Constitutional Law, Oxford.
  • Walker N. (2009). Re- framing EU Constitutionalism, in Walker N., Dunoff J.L., Trachtman J.P. (eds), Ruling the world, Oxford.
  • Weiler J. (1999). The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the new Clothes have an Emperor?’ and other Essays on Euro- pean Integration, Cambridge.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2159102

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_7172_1689-9024_YARS_2022_15_26_5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.