Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 2(35) | 61-75

Article title

Współczesne mechanizmy aukcyjne na potrzeby rynku mediowego

Content

Title variants

EN
Modern Auction Mechanisms for the Media Market

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Online advertising is one of the most dynamically developing forms of advertising in the Polish market. This paper aims to review existing auction mechanisms for pricing and selling online advertisements. The analysis of the available solutions, including their advantages and disadvantages, such as usefulness in determining the advertisers’ willingness to pay, allows for the indication of practical recommendations for the use of specific auction mechanisms for the media market in Poland. The presented solutions can be considered an alternative to the traditional method of concluding purchase/selling transactions of advertising space.
PL
Reklama internetowa jest jedną z najdynamiczniej rozwijających się form reklamy na rynku polskim. W artykule dokonano przeglądu koncepcji wykorzystania mechanizmów aukcyjnych na potrzeby sprzedaży reklam internetowych. Analiza dostępnych rozwiązań, w tym ich wad i zalet, takich jak przydatność w ustalaniu gotowości do zapłaty reklamodawców, pozwala na wskazanie praktycznych rekomendacji dotyczących zastosowania konkretnych mechanizmów aukcyjnych dla rynku mediowego w Polsce jako alternatywy dla tradycyjnego sposobu zawierania transakcji kupna/sprzedaży przestrzeni reklamowych.

Keywords

Year

Issue

Pages

61-75

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

  • Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
  • Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
  • Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
  • Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
  • Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
  • Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
  • Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska

References

  • Arzhanova, K.A., Beregovskaya, T.A. i Silina, S.A. (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on consumer behavior and companies’ internet communication strategies. Proceedings of the Research Technologies of Pandemic Coronavirus Impact (RTCOV 2020), 50–57.
  • Ayush, G.K. i Gowda, R. (2020). A Study on Impact of Covid-19 on Digital Marketing. Vidyabharati International Interdisciplinary Research Journal (Special Issue June 2020), 225–228.
  • Babiarz, J. (2001). Podstawowe techniki aukcyjne i kryteria ich wyboru. Zeszyty Naukowe/Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie, (558), 177–190.
  • Bagwell, L.S. (1992). Dutch auction repurchases: An analysis of shareholder heterogeneity. The Journal of Finance, 47(1), 71–105.
  • Baker, J. i Song, J. (2008). Exploring decision rules for sellers in business-to-consumer (b2c) internet auctions. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 4(1), 1–21.
  • Bara, A., Affandi, F., Farid, A.S. i Marzuki, D.I. (2021). The Effectiveness of Advertising Marketing in Print Media during the Covid 19 Pandemic in the Mandailing Natal Region. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(1), 879–886.
  • Beam, C. i Segev, A. (1998). Auctions on the Internet: A field study. Fisher Center for Management and Information Technology. Working Paper WP, 1032.
  • Bergemann, D. i Said, M. (2010). Dynamic auctions: A survey. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, 1757R.
  • Bernhardt, D. i Scoones, D. (1994). A note on sequential auctions. The American economic review, 84(3), 653–657.
  • Białynicka-Birula, J. (2002). Rola technik aukcyjnych w kształtowaniu cen licytowanych produktów. Zeszyty Naukowe/Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie, (586), 119–132.
  • Binmore, K. i Swierzbinski, J. (2000). Treasury auctions: Uniform or discriminatory? Review of Economic Design, 5(4), 387–410.
  • Chu, H. i Liao, S. (2007). Exploring consumer resale behavior in C2C online auctions: taxonomy and influences on consumer decisions. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1.
  • Clarke, E.H. (1971). Multipart pricing of public goods. Public choice, 17–33.
  • Compte, O. i Jehiel, P. (2007). Auctions and information acquisition: sealed bid or dynamic formats?. The Rand Journal of Economics, 38(2), 355–372.
  • Cox, J.C., Smith, V.L. i Walker, J.M. (1988). Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 1(1), 61–99.
  • Dziuba D.T. (2008). Handel aukcyjny. Rynki, metody, technologie. Warszawa: Difin.
  • Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M. i Schwarz, M. (2007). Internet advertising and the generalized secondprice auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review, 97(1), 242– 259. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/aer.97.1.242.
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. (1988). Revenue equivalence in multi-object auctions. Economics Letters, 26(1), 15–19.
  • Fibich, G., Gavious, A. i Sela, A. (2004). Revenue equivalence in asymmetric auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 115(2), 309–321.
  • Friedman, D. (2018). The double auction market institution: A survey. W: D. Friedman, J. Rust, The Double Auction Market Institutions, Theories, and Evidence (s. 3–26). Routledge.
  • Gershkov, A. (2009). Optimal auctions and information disclosure. Review of Economic Design, 13(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0084-9.
  • Goldfarb, A. (2014). What is different about online advertising? Review of Industrial Organization, 44(2), 115–129.
  • Groves, T. (1973). Incentives in teams. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 617–631.
  • Groves, T. i Ledyard, J.O. (1977). Some limitations of demand revealing processes. Public Choice, 107–124.
  • Gul, F. i Stacchetti, E. (2000). The English auction with differentiated commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 92(1), 66–95.
  • Hidvegi, Z., Wang, W. i Whinston, A.B. (2006). Buy-price English auction. Journal of Economic Theory, 129(1), 31–56.
  • Janssen M., Weerakkody V., Ismagilova E., Sivarajah U. i Irani Z. (2020). A framework for analyzing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.012.
  • Kagel, J.H. i Levin, D. (1986). The Winner’s Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 894–920.
  • Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(3), 227–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00083.
  • Klemperer, P. (2002). What really matters in auction design. Journal of economic perspectives, 16(1), 169–189.
  • Krawczyk, W.M. (2012). Aukcje. W: W.M. Krawczyk (red.), Ekonomia eksperymentalna (s. 176–192). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Kumar, M. i Feldman, S I. (1998, August). Internet Auctions. USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, 3, 49–60.
  • Lewis, R. i Nguyen, D. (2012). Display advertising’s impact on online branded search. Nieopublikowany manuskrypt, Yahoo.
  • Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000). Auctions on the Internet: What’s being auctioned, and how?. The journal of industrial economics, 48(3), 227–252.
  • MacKie-Mason, J.K. i Varian, H.R. (1994). Generalized vickrey auctions. Working Paper. University of Michigan.
  • McAfee, R.P. i McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of economic literature, 25(2), 699– 738.
  • Mester, L.J. (1988). Going, going, gone: Setting prices with auctions. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, (March/April), 3–13.
  • Milgrom, P.R. i Weber, R.J. (1982). A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1089–1122.
  • Möllenberg, A. (2004). Internet auctions in marketing: The consumer perspective. Electronic Markets, 14(4), 360–371.
  • Publicis Groupe. (2021). Wartość rynku reklamowego w Polsce: dwucyfrowe wzrosty [raport]. Pozyskane z: https://admonkey.pl/wartosc-rynku-reklamowego-raport/#page.
  • Rothkopf, M.H. (2007). Thirteen reasons why the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves process is not practical. Operations Research, 55(2), 191–197.
  • Sashi, C.M. i O’Leary, B. (2002). The role of Internet auctions in the expansion of B2B markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(2), 103–110.
  • Schindler, J. (2003). Auctions with interdependent valuations. Theoretical and empirical analysis, in particular of internet auctions. Doctoral dissertation, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
  • Stefańska, M. i Szaban, M. (2021). Zmiany w obszarze marketingu na przykładzie branży farmaceutycznej w okresie pandemii COVID-19 – od podejścia operacyjnego do strategicznego. Marketing w czasach pandemii, 83.
  • Szymczak, B. (2021). Analysis and assessment of the Polish television market and viewers’ behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Doctoral dissertation, Katedra Innowacyjności i Przedsiębiorczości.
  • Thaler, R.H. (1988). Anomalies: The winner’s curse. Journal of economic perspectives, 2(1), 191– 202.
  • Tierney, S.F., Schatzki, T. i Mukerji, R. (2008). Uniform-pricing versus pay-as-bid in wholesale electricity markets: does it make a difference? New York ISO.
  • Turban, E. (1997). Auctions and bidding on the Internet: An assessment. Electronic Markets, 7(4), 7–11.
  • Urban, S. i Olszańska, A. (1998). Zorganizowane rynki towarowe. Giełdy towarowe, aukcje, centra handlu hurtowego, targi i wystawy. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego we Wrocławiu.
  • Wang, X., Montgomery, A. i Srinivasan, K. (2008). When auction meets fixed price: A theoretical and empirical examination of buy-it-now auctions. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6(4), 339– 370.
  • Wolfstetter, E. (1996). Auctions: an introduction. Journal of economic surveys, 10(4), 367–420.
  • Vickrey, W. (1961), Counterspeculations, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8–37. https://do.i.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
20874812

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_7172_1733-9758_2021_35_5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.