Ciało obce: zasady RODO a gospodarka rynkowa

• Authors: Przemysław Pałka

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł analizuje relacje pomiędzy logiką RODO a logiką rynkową w kontekście tzw. kapitalizmu inwigilacji. Wbrew powszechnie przyjmowanej opinii szkody związane z komercyjnym nadzorem (manipulacja, dyskryminacja, negatywne skutki dla zdrowia psychicznego) często nie wynikają z niewystarczającej egzekucji RODO, a z faktu, że rozporządzenie to nie wypowiada się na temat legalności konkretnych celów przetwarzania danych. W realiach rynkowych, przy braku regulacji, to administratorzy de facto decydują o tym, jakie dane wykorzystane mogą być w jakim celu. By wyjść z tego impasu, artykuł proponuje ustawowe uregulowanie dopuszczalności niektórych konkretnych celów przetwarzania danych.

Keywords

PL

prawo ochrony danych osobowych; prawo konsumenckie; rynek

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 62-84

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Przemysław Pałka

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Wydział Prawa i Administracji

• https://orcid.org/0000000268791596

References

• Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431.
• Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A. i Rieke, A. (2019). Discrimination through Optimization: How Facebook’s Ad Delivery Can Lead to Biased Outcomes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 199:1–199:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359301.
• Alpaydin, E. (2016). Machine Learning: The New AI. The MIT Press.
• Andrew, J. i Baker, M. (2021). The General Data Protection Regulation in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04239-z.
• Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F. i Trossen, D. R. (2014). Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies, 43(1), 1–35. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1086/674424.
• Ben-Shahar, O. i Schneider, C. E. (2014). More Than You Wanted to Know: The Failure of Mandated Disclosure. Princeton University Press.
• Bhargava, V. R. i Velasquez, M. (2021). Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(3), 321–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.32.
• Boom, W. van i Garde, A. (2016). The European Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: Impact, Enforcement Strategies and National Legal Systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616391.
• Breen, S., Ouazzane, K. i Patel, P. (2020). GDPR: Is your consent valid? Business Information Review, 37(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382120903254.
• Citron, D. i Solove, D. J. (2022). Privacy Harms. Boston University Law Review, 102(3), 793–864.
• Cofone, I. (2021). Beyond Data Ownership. Cardozo Law Review, 43, 501.
• Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
• Contissa, G., Docter, K., Lagioia, F., Lippi, M., Micklitz, H.-W., Pałka, P., Sartor, G. i Torroni, P. (2018). CLAUDETTE meets GDPR: Automating the Evaluation of Privacy Policies Using Artificial Intelligence [Working Paper]. http://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/60795.
• Dunn, P. i Gregorio, G. D. (2022). The European risk-based approaches: Connecting constitutional dots in the digital age. Common Market Law Review, 59(2). https://kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=Journals\COLA\COLA2022032.pdf.
• Fajgielski, P. (2018). Ogólne Rozporządzenie o ochornione danych osobowych. Ustawa o Ochronie Danych Osobobowych. Komentarz. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Gellert, R. (2020). The Risk-Based Approach to Data Protection. Oxford University Press.
• Gentile, G. i Lynskey, O. (2022). DEFICIENT BY DESIGN? THE TRANSNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE GDPR. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 71(4), 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000355.
• Gretsky, N. E., Ostroy, J. M. i Zame, W. R. (1997). An Application of Measure Theory to Perfect Competition. In Stochastic processes and functional analysis. CRC Press.
• Hacker, P. (2021). Manipulation by algorithms. Exploring the triangle of unfair commercial practice, data protection, and privacy law. European Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12389.
• Helberger, N., Dobber, T. i de Vreese, C. (2021). Towards Unfair Political Practices Law: Learning lessons from the regulation of unfair commercial practices for online political advertising. JIPITEC, 12(3). http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-12-3-2021/5338.
• Helberger, N., Lynskey, O., Micklitz, H.-W., Rott, P., Sax, M. i Strycharz, J. (2021). EU Consumer Protection 2.0: Structural asymmetries in digital consumer markets. https://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2021-018_eu_consumer_protection.0_0.pdf.
• Herrine, L. (2021). The Folklore of Unfairness. New York University Law Review, 96, 431.
• Hijmans, H. (2020). Article 1 Subject-matter and objectives. W: C. Kuner, L. A. Bygrave, C. Docksey, L. Drechsler (red.), The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826491.003.0003.
• Howells, G., Micklitz, H.-W. i Wilhelmsson, T. (2016). European Fair Trading Law: The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580890.
• Hwang, T. (2020). Subprime Attention Crisis: Advertising and the Time Bomb at the Heart of the Internet. FSG Originals.
• ICCL. (2022). The Biggest Data Breach: ICCL report on scale of Real-Time Bidding data broadcasts in the U.S. and Europe. https://www.iccl.ie/digital-data/iccl-report-on-the-scale-of-real-time-bidding-data-broadcasts-in-the-u-s-and-europe/.
• Igual, L. i Seguí, S. (2017). Introduction to Data Science. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50017-1.
• Jabłońska, P. (2020). Konstytucyjne podstawy rozproszonej kontroli konstytucyjności prawa. Przegląd Sądowy, 11–12. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/300970.
• Kamara, I. i De Hert, P. (2018). Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground: A pragmatic approach. W: E. Selinger, J. Polonetsky, O. Tene (red.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (pp. 321–352). Cambridge University Press.
• Krasuski, A. (2018). Ochrona danych osobowych na podstawie RODO. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Krasuski, A. i Siembida, P. (2022). Analiza ryzyka w ochronie danych osobowych. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Liepiņa, R., Contissa, G., Drazewski, K., Lagioia, F., Lippi, M., Micklitz, H., Pałka, P., Sartor, G. i Torroni, P. (2019). GDPR Privacy Policies in CLAUDETTE: Challenges of Omission, Context and Multilingualism. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Automated Semantic Analysis of Information in Legal Text (ASAIL 2019), 7. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2385/paper9.pdf.
• Litwiński, P., Barta, P. i Kawecki, M. (2018). Rozporządzenie UE w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w związku z przetwarzaniem danych osobowych i swobodnym przepływem takich danych. Komentarz (P. Litwiński, red.). C.H. Beck.
• Luguri, J. i Strahilevitz, L. J. (2021). Shining a Light on Dark Patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis, 13(1), 43–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa006.
• Lynskey, O. (2014). Deconstructing data protection: The ‘added-value’ of a right to data protection in the EU legal order. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 63(3), 569–597. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589314000244.
• Matczak, M. (2010). Kompetencja w prawie administracyjnym. W: R. Hauser, Z. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel, System Prawa Admistracyjnego. Tom I. Instytucje Prawa Adminsitracyjnego. C.H. Beck.
• Mayer-Schönberger, V. i Ramge, T. (2018). Reinventing Capitalism in the Age of Big Data. Basic Books.
• McDonald, A. M. i Cranor, L. F. (2008). The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies 2008 Privacy Year in Review. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 4(3), 543–568.
• Mik, E. (2016). The erosion of autonomy in online consumer transactions. Law, Innovation and Technology, 8(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2016.1161893.
• Namysłowska, M. i Jabłonowska, A. (2019). Information Obligations and Disinformation of Consumers: Polish Law Report. W: G. Straetmans (red.), Information Obligations and Disinformation of Consumers (ss. 301–337). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18054-6_8.
• Niedośpiał, M. (2012). Swoboda umów: Synteza. Warszawa. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/80675.
• Niewiadomski, Z. (2010). Pojęcie administracji publicznej. W: R. Hauser, Z. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel, System Prawa Admistracyjnego. Tom I. Instytucje Prawa Adminsitracyjnego. C.H. Beck.
• Nottage, L. (2018). Product safety regulation. Handbook of Research on International Consumer Law, Second Edition. Pozyskano z: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785368202/9781785368202.00015. xml.
• Obar, J. A. i Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2018). The Biggest Lie on the Internet: Ignoring the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service Policies of Social Networking Services. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486870.
• Padden, M. i Öjehag-Pettersson, A. (2021). Protected how? Problem representations of risk in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Critical Policy Studies, 15(4), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.1927776.
• Pałka, P. (2020). Data Management Law for the 2020s: The Lost Origins and the New Needs. Buffalo Law Review, 68(2), 559–640.
• Pałka, P. (2021). The World of Fifty (Interoperable) Facebooks. Seton Hall Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3539792.
• Purtova, N. (2018). The law of everything. Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law. Law, Innovation and Technology, 10(1), 40–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1452176.
• Ranchordas, S. (2014). Innovation-Friendly Regulation: The Sunset of Regulation, the Sunrise of Innovation Symposium – Governance of Emerging Technologies: Law, Policy, and Ethics. Jurimetrics, 55(2), 201–224.
• Sadurski, W. (2002). Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/22.2.275.
• Safjan, M. (2012). Zasady prawa prywatnego. In M. Safjan, System Prawa Prywatnego. Tom 1. Prawo cywilne – Część ogólna (2nd ed.). C.H. Beck.
• Samet, D. (1996). Hypothetical Knowledge and Games with Perfect Information. Games and Economic Behavior, 17(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0104.
• Sikorska-Lewandowska, A. (2019). Zasady prowadzenia działalności gospodarczej w świetle ustawy – Prawo przedsiębiorców. Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, (1), 52–58.
• Sobczyk, A. (2019). RODO. Rozproszona władza publiczna. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Solove, D. J. (2012). Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1880–1903.
• Solove, D. J. i Schwartz, P. M. (2018). Information Privacy Law (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
• Stigler, G. J. (1957). Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated. Journal of Political Economy, 65(1), 1–17.
• Susser, D., Roessler, B., Nissenbaum, H. (2019). Online Manipulation: Hidden Influences in a Digital World. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 4, 1–45.
• Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. ArXiv:1301.6822 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6822.
• Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2018). Designing for Privacy and its Legal Framework: Data Protection by Design and Default for the Internet of Things (1st ed. 2018 edition). Springer.
• Trzaskowski, J. (2021). Your Privacy Is Important to Us! – Restoring Human Dignity in Data-Driven Marketing. ExTuto.
• Trzaskowski, J. (2022). Data-driven value extraction and human well-being under EU law. Electronic Markets. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00528-0.
• Varian, H. R. (2009). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (Eighth edition). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Veale, M. i Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act – Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402.
• Viljoen, S. (2021). A Relational Theory of Data Governance. Yale Law Journal, 131, 573.
• Wagner, W. i Walker, W. (2019). Incomprehensible!: A Study of How Our Legal System Encourages Incomprehensibility, Why It Matters, and What We Can Do About It. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139051774.
• Waldman, A. (2020). Data Protection by Design? A Critique of Article 25 of the GDPR. Cornell International Law Journal, 53(1), i–168.
• Waldman, A. E. (2021). Industry Unbound: The Inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power. Cambridge University Press.
• Waldron, J. (2021). The rule of law and the role of courts. Global Constitutionalism, 10(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381720000283.
• Witkowska-Nowakowska, K. (2018). Zasady przetwarzania. W: D. Lubasz, RODO dla małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw. Wolters Kluwer.
• Xenidis, R. (2020). Tuning EU equality law to algorithmic discrimination: Three pathways to resilience. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27(6), 736–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20982173.
• Zakon, A. (2020). Optimized for Addiction: Extending Product Liability Concepts to Defectively Designed Social Media Algorithms and Overcoming the Communications Decency Act. Wisconsin Law Review, 2020, 1107.
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (First edition). PublicAffairs.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7172/2299-5749.IKAR.5.11.4

Biblioteka Nauki

2207124