E-commerce Taxation as an Example of Legal Deadlock

• Authors: Krzysztof Lipka

Abstracts

EN

Many of the principles of taxation that were developed in the first half of the 20th century, such as the arm’s length principle and the definition of the term “permanent establishment” (PE) in determining the tax position of international business operations, when applied to the business models of the 21st century, often result in the under-taxation of businesses that are otherwise fully compliant with the laws as presently written and implemented. Compounding the problem is the fact that these rules and principles of taxation are broadly recognized and are enshrined in a wide network of tax treaties. This makes the task of modifying or updating these rules and principals extremely difficult. Using legal-dogmatic and legal-theoretical methods, the author will show that present attempts to tax e-commerce transactions unilaterally are not effective and that, under present conditions, even organizations such as the EU are unable to address the problem at hand. The OECD project, commissioned by the G-20, which seeks to create a set of international e-commerce taxation rules, faces some very serious difficulties – largely because a well-established “set in stone” complement of internationally accepted laws, rules, and regulations is serving to block the development of new, more appropriate rules. This phenomenon has become known as the lock-in effect or legal impossibilism. In order to effectively address this phenomenon, lawmakers on a global basis must understand the mechanisms that are blocking the effective evolution of business taxation.

Keywords

EN

e-commerce; international taxation; lock-in effect

• Publisher: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 60-79

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Lipka

References

• Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, OECD Publishing, Paris 2014.
• Ahrens L., Bothner F., The Big Bang: Tax Evasion After Automatic Exchange of Information Under FATCA and CRS, “New Political Economy” 2019, No. 6.
• Akhtar J., Grondona V., Tax Haven listing in multiple hues: Blind winking and conniving, “South Center Research Papers” 2019, No. 94.
• Atanassova A., Accounting problems in e-commerce, “Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług” 2018, No. 2.
• Azam R., The Political Feasibility of a Global E-commerce Tax, “University of Memphis Law Review” 2013, No. 43.
• Azam R., Ruling the World: Generating International Tax Norms in the Era of Globalization and BEPS, “Suffolk University Law Review” 2017, No. 4.
• Azam R., Global taxation of cross border e-commerce income, “Virginia Tax Review” 2011, No. 31.
• Baistrocchi E., The Use and Interpretation of Tax Treaties in the Emerging World: Theory and Implications, “British Tax Review” 2008, No. 4.
• Chaisse J., Ji X., Soft law in international law making: How soft law is reshaping international economic governance, “Asian Journal of WTO Law and Health Policy” 2018, No. 13.
• Chalimoniuk D., Rozwój internetu jako szansa dla przedsi ębiorstw, „Zeszyty Naukowe UPH w Siedlcach” 2011, No. 88.
• Cockfield J., The rise of the OECD as informal world tax organization through national responses to e-commerce tax challenges, “Yale Journal of Law and Technology” 2006, No. 8.
• Colle S., Bennett A., State-induced, Strategic, or Toxic? An Ethical Analysis of Tax Avoidance Practices, “Business and Professional Ethics Journal” 2014, No. 33.
• Cui W., The Superiority of the Digital Services Tax over Significant Digital Presence Proposals, “National Tax Journal” 2019, No. 4.
• Doligalski T., Internet Business Models and Types of Goods Offered, “Journal of Business Models” 2018, No. 2.
• Davidson S., Berg Ch., Submission to the Senate Inquiry into Corporate Tax Avoidance Institute of Public Affairs 2015, www.ipa.org.au.
• Dietsch P., Catching capital. The ethics of tax competition, New York 2015.
• E-commerce: many of the challenges of collecting VAT and customs duties remain to be resolved, 12/2009, European Court of Auditors.
• EU Parliament Report: Tax Challenges in Digital Economy. www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579002/IPOL_STU%282016%29579002_EN.pdf.
• Friedlander L., Wilkie S., Policy forum: the history of tax treaties provisions and why it is important to know about it, https://www.uniheidelberg.de/institute/fak2/mussgnug/historyoftaxdocuments/schrifttum/aufsaetze/AUFS00020.pdf.
• Gadżo S., Nexus requirements for taxation of non-residents business income: a normative evaluation in the context of the global economy, Amsterdam 2018.
• Gałuszka J., How to Tax E-commerce – Global or National Problem?, “Studia Ekonomiczne” 2013, No. 150.
• Geurts M., Server as a permanent establishment?, “Intertax” 2000, No. 4.
• Giles Ch., Crow D., US threatens to slap tariffs on British cars, “FT” 2020, January 23, p. 2, paper issue.
• Greggi M., How Goes the Night, Commissioner? Some Considerations on the Digital Tax Proposal, Project for European Commission (2017 1 LI01 KA203 000088).
• Greggi M., Genuine Nexus or Perpetual Allegiance? (Some Considerations on the ‘Diverted Profit Tax’ Proposal), Draft for TRN Conference 2015.
• Hadzhieva E., Impact of Digitalisation on International Tax Matters, Report for Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate General for Internal Policies of the European Parliament.
• Hansen R., Taking More than They Give: MNE Tax Privateering and Apple’s “Ocean” Income, “German Law Journal” 2018, No. 4.
• Hewitt P., Lymer A., Oats L., History of International Business Taxation, [in:] The International Taxation System, eds. A. Lymer, J. Hasseldyne, New York 2002.
• Holmes D., E-commerce tax: A sober view of cyberspace, “OECD Observer” 2002, No. 230.
• Hybka M., Optymalizacja podatkowa z wykorzystaniem hybrydyzacji, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia” 2014, No. 65.
• Jain N., Tax Evasion a Dark Side of E-Commerce, “International Journal of Engineering and Management Research” 2013, No. 5.
• Jamroży M., Zakład zagraniczny w kontekście planu BEPS, „Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach” 2016, No. 294.
• Kayis Kumar A., Taxing cross-border intercompany transactions: Are financing activities fungible?, “Australian Tax Forum” 2015, No. 30.
• Krzemińska I., Propozycje opodatkowania znaczącej obecno ści cyfrowej w Unii Europejskiej, „Krytyka Prawa” 2019, No. 2.
• Kohler P., Asset-Centred Redistributive Policies for Sustainable Development, “12th International Post Keynesian Conference Paper” 2014, 28 September.
• Liu D., Reyneveld J., Straatman C., International – OECD’s Work on the Digital Economy: Impact Far beyond the Digital Economy, “International Transfer Pricing Journal” 2019, No. 5.
• Makunike C., The Nexus between Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and BEPS. Lessons for African Tax Policy Makers and Administrators, “ATRN working paper” 2016, No. 5.
• Malicka M., Zalasiński A., Rola oficjalnego Komentarza do Modelu Konwencji OECD w interpretacji umów dotyczących unikania podwójnego opodatkowania opartych na tym Modelu „Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2005, No. 1.
• Martynkiewicz Frank M., E-commerce Challenge within B2C Transactions inside EU Countries, “Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu” 2012, No. 515.
• Mason R., Parada L., Digital Battlefront in the Tax Wars, “Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper” 2018, No. 2018–16.
• Mosquera I., Lesage V., Lips W., Tax and Development: The Link between International Taxation, The Base Erosion Profit Shifting Project and the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, “Working Paper Series W 2018/4” 2018, United Nations University.
• Motala M., The New Global Politics of sovereign international tax: Space, time and why BEPS is not the final frontier, “Banking and Finance Law Review” 2018.
• Mwencha M., Taxation of electronic commerce – a commentary, https://www.academia.edu/40141032/TAXATION_OF_ELECTRONIC_COMMERCE_ A_COMMENTARY.
• Ngantung Y., Tax treaties and developing countries, [in:] Tax policy challenges in the 21st century, eds. R. Petruzzi, K. Spies, Vienna. 2014.
• Pistone H.P., Blueprints for a New PE Nexus to Tax Business Income in the Era of the Digital Economy, “WU International Taxation Research Paper Series” 2015, No. 15.
• Quak E., Timmis H., Double Taxation Agreements and Developing Countries, Institute of Development Studies K4D Helpdesk Report 2018.
• Radvan M., Taxation of Instagram Influencers, “Studia Iuridica Lublinencia” 2021, No. 2.
• Readhead A., Preventing Tax Base Erosion in Africa: A Regional Study on Transfer Pricing Challenges in the Mining Sector, “Natural Resource Governance Institute” 2016, July.
• Report Fair Tax Mark: The Silicon Six and Their 100 billion Global Tax Gap Dollars, 2019, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/faang stocks.asp
• Rocha S., The Other Side of BEPS: “Imperial Taxation” and “International Tax Imperialism”, [in:] Tax Sovereignty in the BEPS Era, eds. S.A. Rocha, A. Christians, Alphen aan den Rijn 2017.
• Roin J., Can income from capital be taxed: An international perspective, [in:] Taxing Capital Income, eds. H. Aaron, L. Burman, E. Struerle, Chicago 2007.
• Romm T., Tech giants led by Amazon, Facebook and Google spent nearly half a billion on lobbying over the past decade, new data shows, “The Washington Post” 2020, January 22.
• Rybiński K., Outsourcing i offshoring usług. Siatka pojęć, trendy i bariery rozwojowe, [in:] Globalizacja Usług. Outsourcing, offshoring i shared services centers, eds. A. Szymaniak, Poznań 2007.
• Schroger M., Next steps in international debate, [in:] Tax Policy Challenges in the 21st Century, eds. K. Spies, R. Petruzzi, L. Verlag, Vienna 2014.
• Solilova V., Nerudova D., Transfer Pricing in SMEs: Critical Analysis and Practical Solutions, Brno 2018.
• Siliafis K., Taxation of E-commerce – A Task for Jugglers, “Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology” 2014.
• Simkin M.G., Bartlett G.W., Shim J.P., Pros and Cons of E-commerce Taxation, “International Business &Economics Research Journal” 2011, No. 2.
• Skaar A., Erosion of the Concept of Permanent Establishment: Electronic Commerce, “Intertax” 2000, No. 5.
• Supporting the Development of More Effective Tax Systems. A Report to the G-20 Development Working Group by the IMF, OECD, UN and WORLD BANK, www.oecd.org/ctp/48993634.pdf. UN Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Report on the Sixth Session (18–22 October 2010), Economic and Social Council Official Records, 2010 Supplement No. 25.
• Szwajdler P., Jurysdykcja Podatkowa w przypadku działalności gospodarczej w branży e-commerce, „Journal of Education, Health and Sport” 2017, No. 7.
• Vega A., International governance through soft law: The case of the OECD transfer pricing guidelines, “TranState Working Papers” 2012, No. 163.
• Ward T., Sipior J., To tax or not to tax e-commerce. A United States perspective, “Journal of Electronic Commerce Research” 2005, No. 5.
• Wyraz E., The application of international conventions and treaties to third states, “Czech Year book of International Law Volume” 2017, No. 7.
• Zajadło J., Pojęcie „imposybilizm prawny” a polityczność prawa i prawoznawstwa, „PiP” 2017, No. 3.
• Zhang K., Wang Q., Liang Q., Chen H., A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews” 2016, No. 58.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7206/kp.2080-1084.523

Biblioteka Nauki

2154768