Populism in Internet Memes. An Investigation with Analytical Approaches from Discourse Analysis and Multimodality

• Authors: Fabia Hultin Morger

Abstracts

EN

This article explores if and how populist elements are expressed in Internet memes within German-language political discourses. This is done by conducting a data-based investigation rooted in the discourse historical approach and multimodality theory. Memes with varying political alignments are analysed with regards to how they express either of the following features of populist style: the appeal to the people vs. the elite, the use of bad manners, and the performance of crisis. Special focus is given to the political context as well as the semiotic resources used to convey populist themes. The findings of this study show that in order for populism to be analysed within memes a gradational perspective on populism is necessary. Applying this method, a diverse variety of populist characteristics can be found in memes, revealing the many possibilities of populist expression in this format.

Keywords

EN

populism; populist style; Internet memes; multimodality; discourse

• Publisher: Instytut Germanistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Instytut Filologii Germańskiej Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
• Journal: tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs
• Year: 2022
• Issue: 16
• Pages: 277-301

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Fabia Hultin Morger

References

• Androutsopoulos Jannis (2014): Mediatization And Sociolinguistic Change. Key Concepts, Research Traditions, Open Issues. In: Androutsopoulos Jannis (ed.): Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Berlin, Boston, 3-48.
• Androutsopoulos Jannis (2016): Mediatisierte Praktiken: Zur Rekontextualisierung von Anschlusskommunikation in den Sozialen Medien. In: Deppermann, Arnulf, Feilke, Helmuth Linke Angelika (eds.): Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken. Berlin, Boston, 4-18.
• Block Elena, Negrine Ralph (2017): The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework. International Journal of Communication 11, 178-197.
• Bülow Lars, Johann Michael (2019): Politische Internet-Memes – Theoretische Herausforderungen und Empirische Befunde. Berlin.
• Canovan Margaret (1999): Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy Political Studies 47(1), 2-16.
• Caufield Rachel Paine (2012): The Influence of ‘Infoenterpropagainment’: Exploring the Power of Political Satire as a Distinct Form of Political Humor. In: Baumgartner Jody C., Morris Jonathan S. (eds.): Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. Hoboken, 3-20.
• Cosentino Gabriele (2020): Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics of Disinformation. Cham.
• Dafaure Maxime (2020): The ‘Great Meme War:’ The Alt-Right and Its Multifarious Enemies. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10, 1-28.
• Denisova Anastasia (2019): Internet Memes and Society. Social, Cultural, and Political Contexts. New York.
• Ekström Mats, Patrona Marianna, Thornborrow Joanna (2018): Right-Wing Populism and the Dynamics of Style: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective on Mediated Political Performances. Palgrave Communications 4, 1-11.
• Engel Jakob, Wodak Ruth (2012): “Calculated Ambivalence” and Holocaust Denial in Austria. W: Wodak, Ruth, Richardson, John E. (eds.): Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text. New York, 73-96.
• Gaugele Elke (2019): The New Obscurity in Style. Alt-Right Faction, Populist Normalization, and the Cultural War on Fashion from the Far Right. Fashion Theory 23, 711-31.
• Ging Debbie (2019): Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities 22, 638-57.
• Girnth Heiko (2015): Sprache und Sprachverwendung in der Politik: eine Einführung in die linguistische Analyse öffentlich-politischer Kommunikation. Berlin.
• Gothard Kelly, Dewhurst David Rushing, Minot Joshua R., Adams Jane Lydia, Danforth Christopher M., Dodds Peter Sheridan (2021): The Incel Lexicon: Deciphering the Emergent Cryptolect of a Global Misogynistic Community. Ithaca.
• Grundlingh Lezandra (2018): Memes as Speech Acts. Social Semiotics 28, 147-68.
• Hermanns Fritz (1994): Schlüssel–, Schlag– Und Fahnenwörter. Zu Begrifflichkeit Und Theorie Der Lexikalischen ‘Politischen Semantik’. Arbeiten aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich 245: Sprache Und Situation. Heidelberg, 3-55.
• Jagers Jan, Walgrave Stefaan (2007): “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium”. European Journal of Political Research 46(3), 319-45.
• Januschek Franz, Reisigl Martin (2014): Populismus in der Digitalen Mediendemokratie – Editorial. In: Januschek Franz, Reisigl Martin (eds.): Populismus in Der Digitalen Mediendemokratie. Duisburg, 7-17.
• Leeuwen Theo v. (2005): Introducing Social Semiotics. London.
• Lüger Heinz-Helmut (2019): Populistisches Argumentieren? Feindbilder und Sprachstrategien der AfD. tekst i dyskurs – text und diskurs 12, 137-163.
• Machin David (2013): What Is Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies? Critical Discourse Studies 10, 347-55.
• Machin David, Leeuwen Theo v. (2016): Multimodality, Politics and Ideology. Journal of Language and Politics 15, 243-258.
• Mandiberg Michael (2012): The Social Media Reader. New York.
• Marx Konstanze (2019): Internetlinguistik. Heidelberg.
• Milner Ryan M. (2013): Pop Polyvocality: Internet Memes, Public Participation, and the Occupy Wall Street Movement. International journal of communication 7, 2357-90.
• Milner Ryan M. (2016): The World Made Meme. Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA.
• Moffitt Benjamin (2016): The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Palo Alto.
• Morger Fabia (2020) “Satire Junge SATIREEEE”: Nachrichtenparodien in Memes und deren Aushandlung im Kontext des Web 2.0. Linguistik Online 103, 129-57.
• Mouffe Chantal (2018): For a Left Populism. London.
• Mudde Cas (2007): Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge.
• Osterroth Andreas (2015): Das Internet-Meme als Sprache-Bild-Text. Image 22, 26-46.
• Rae Maria (2020): Hyperpartisan News: Rethinking the Media for Populist Politics. New Media and Society 23, 1117-32.
• Osterroth Andreas (2020): Internet-Memes als multimodale Sprechakte in öffentliche Diskursen anhand von Beispielen aus Antwortthreads von @realDonaldTrump. Linguisik Online 101(1), 115-137.
• Reisigl Martin, Wodak, Ruth (2009): The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). W: Wodak Ruth, Meyer Michael (eds.): Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Los Angeles, 87-122.
• Reisigl Martin, Januschek Franz (2015): Populismus in der digitalen Mediendemokratie. Duisburg.
• Reisigl Martin (2020): Mit zweierlei Maß gemessen – Kalkulierte Ambivalenz in rechtspopulistischen Repräsentationen von Geschlechterverhältnissen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 50, 203-229.
• Römer David, Spieß Constanze (2019): Populistischer Sprachgebrauch als Phänomen Politischer Kommunikation. In: Spieß Constanze, Römer David (eds.): Populismus und Sagbarkeiten in Öffentlich-Politischen Diskursen. Duisburg, 7-19.
• Roslyng Mette Marie, Larsen Gorm (2021): The Struggle between the Power of Language and the Language of Power: Pro- and Anti-Vaccination Memes and the Discursive Construction of Knowledge. Journal of Language & Politics 20, 894-912.
• Ruzza Carlo, Pejovic Milica (2019): Populism at Work: The Language of the Brexiteers and the European Union. Critical Discourse Studies 16, 432-448.
• Schröter Melanie (2019): ‘Einfach Wieder Offen Reden?’ Populistische Diskursmanöver und Anti-Political Correctness in Deutschland Und Grossbritannien. In: Spieß Constanze, Römer David (eds.): Populismus und Sagbarkeiten in Öffentlich-Politischen Diskursen- Duisburg, 43-61.
• Shifman Limor (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
• Spieß Constanze, Römer David (2019). Populismus und Sagbarkeiten in Öffentlich-Politischen Diskursen. Duisburg.
• Spieß Constanze, Weidacher Georg (2020): Editorial: (Rechts)Populismus – interdisziplinär. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 50, 165-69.
• Spitzmüller Jürgen, Warnke Ingo H. (2011): Discourse as a ‘Linguistic Object’: Methodical and Methodological Delimitations. Critical Discourse Studies 8, 75-94.
• Thompson Jack, Hawley George (2021): Does the Alt-Right Still Matter? An Examination of Alt-Right Influence between 2016 and 2018. Nations and Nationalism 27, 1165-80.
• Wagner Anna, Schwarzenegger Christian (2020): A Populism of Lulz: The Proliferation of Humor, Satire, and Memes as Populist Communication in Digital Culture. In: Benjamin Krämer, Christina Holtz-Bacha (eds.): Perspectives on Populism and the Media. Avenues for Research. Baden-Baden, 312-331.
• Weidacher Georg (2019): Sarkastische Internet-Memes im Flüchtlingsdiskurs. W: Bülow Lars, Johann Michael (eds.): Politische Internet-Memes – Theoretische Herausforderungen und empirische Befunde. Berlin, 167-193.
• Weidacher Georg (2020): Wo Populisten zu Hause sind. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 50, 231-258.
• Wodak Ruth, Meyer Michael (2001): Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Los Angeles.
• Wodak Ruth, Köhler, Katharina (2010): Wer oder was ist »fremd«? Diskurshistorische Analyse fremdenfeindlicher Rhetorik in Österreich. SWS-Rundschau 50, 33-55.
• Wodak Ruth (2015): The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles.
• Wodak Ruth, Krzyżanowski Michał (2017). Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism.’ Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4), 471-484.
• Wodak Ruth (2021): The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right discourse. London.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7311/tid.16.2022.14

Biblioteka Nauki

2164548