Cross borders companies and worldwide industry management. Past, present, and future for businesses at time of slowbalization.

• Authors: Geoffrey Ditta

Abstracts

EN

Emerging markets are once again gaining the upper hand. According to the World Bank, current market trends indicate that emerging economies will account for more than 70% of global economic output by 2050. With the economic enigmas and the return of emerging economies, three billion new people have suddenly integrated into the global economy, all at once: one and a half billion Chinese, one billion Indians, and half a billion people from the former Soviet bloc. How then can the strategy that predominates in the internationalization of a company be identified? In this study we will define the necessary internal organization of a company and its activities and establish what changes must be made in the internal structure of employees regarding quantity, qualification, training and facilities for machines, technology, processes, and quality control. Before starting to promote the company internationally, it is advisable to check whether the brand can be used or whether it should be changed. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had profoundly affected international trade, investment and travel. The pandemic has slowed the physical movement of people, goods and services, which is also the slowbalization thesis, and this now deserves careful consideration. The goal of this paper is to examine the objective of internationalization and the international development of companies. In this study are introduced the theoretical basis and a discussion on how exporting companies need nowadays to ask the right questions and how the analysis of the economic management can help internationalize their business. The second part of the study includes the results and conclusions.

Keywords

EN

Strategy; production; market; internationalization; global; management; slowdown

• Publisher: Academicus. International Scientific Journal publishing house
• Journal: Academicus. International Scientific Journal
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 26
• Pages: 78-92

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Geoffrey Ditta

References

• Altbach, G, & Knight, J. (2007). The Internationalization of Higher Education. Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, pp. 290–305.
• Andersen, O. (1997). Internationalization and market entry mode: A review of theories and conceptual frameworks. Management International Review, 37, pp. 27-42.
• Ariu, A. (2016). ‘Services versus goods trade: a firm-level comparison.’ In: Review of World Economics, 1, pp. 19–41.
• Baldwin, R, & Freeman, R. (2021). Risks and global supply chains: What we know and what we need to know. NBER Working Paper No. 29444.
• Barber, J, & Ghauri, P. (2012). Internationalization of service industry firms:Understanding distinctive characteristics. Service Industries Journal - SERV IND J, 32, pp. 1-4.
• Bell, J. (1985). The internationalisation of small computer software firms: A further challenge to “stage” theories. European Journal of Marketing, 29, 60-75.
• Belniak, M. (2015). ‘Factors Stimulating Internationalisation of Firms: An Attempted Holistic Synthesis. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 2, pp. 125-140.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2007). Sequence of value-added activities in the internationalization of developing country MNEs. Journal of International Management, 13, 258-277.
• Ditta, G. (2020). Internationalization and Human Resource Management. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 11(22), 30-40.
• Doh, J. (2005). Offshore outsourcing: Implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 42, pp. 695-704.
• Dunning, J. H. (1995). Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, pp. 461-493.
• Ekeledo, I, & Sivakumar, K. (1998). Foreign Market Entry Mode Choice of Service Firms: A Contingency Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4, pp. 274–292.
• Forsgren, M. (2002). The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11, pp. 257- 278.
• Freund, C, & Weinhold, D. (2002). The Internet and International Trade in Services. American Economic Review, 92, pp. 236–240.
• Harvey, D. (2000). Time-Space, compression and the postmodern condition. The global Transformation Reader, 10, pp. 82-99.
• Hunya, G. (2021). Fragile post-COVID FDI bounce-back in CESEE. Monthly Report, 11, pp. 9-15.
• Javorcik, B. (2020). Global supply chains will not be the same in the post- COVID-19 world. COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work, pp. 111-116.
• Malnight, T. (1995). Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp. 119-131.
• Manta, O. (2020). Nothing for us without us” Measures applied at European level during the current crisis. Journal for Freedom of Conscience, 2, pp.13-15.
• Manuelli, R.E, & Seshadri, A. (2014). Human capital and the wealth of nations. American Economic Review, 9, pp. 2736-2762.
• Mookherjee, D, & Napel, S. (2007). Intergenerational mobility and macroeconomic history dependence. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, pp. 49- 78.
• Musaraj, A. (2020). The Pandemic and Rhetoric of Organization. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 11(22), 21-29.
• Profita, S. (2019). Slowbalization and its risks. Columbia University working paper. New York, NY: Columbia University.
• Restuccia, D, & Rogerson, R. (2017). The causes and costs of misallocation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, pp. 151-174.
• Rodtook, P, & Altinay, L. (2013). Reasons for Internationalization of Domestic Hotel Chains in Thailand. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 22, pp. 92–115
• Rugman, M. (2010). Reconciling Internalization Theory and the Eclectic Paradigm. Multinational Business Review, 18, pp. 1–12.
• Stroebe, W, & Frey, B.S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, pp. 121-137.
• Sparapani, E, & Callejo, D. (2015). A Perspective on the Standardized Curriculum and Its Effect on Teaching and Learning. Journal of Education, 2, pp.10.
• Stoker, G (1998). Governance as theory. International Social Science Journal, 155, pp.17–28
• Teece, David J. (2021). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 3, pp. 31.
• Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, pp. 190-207.
• Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, pp. 341-363.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7336/academicus.2022.26.05

Biblioteka Nauki

2079465