Media, zło i społeczeństwo. Wykorzystanie mediów i ich wpływ na postrzeganie przestępczości i postawy wobec polityki karnej

• Authors: Christian Pfeiffer , Michael Windzio , Matthias Kleimann

Title variants

EN

Media, Evil and Society. Media Use and its Impacts on Crime Perception, Sentencing Attitudes and Crime Policy

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

ln democratic societies, crime policy and its management by parliaments and ministries largely depends on trends in crime. If, over a prolonged period. the media report strong upward trends in the number of crimes committed and if the public clebate on crime focuses on spectacular, serious crimes, policymakers come under heavy pressure to increase statutory punishments and tighten the rules of procedure for criminal prosecutions. The courts in turn feel bound to hand out tougher sentences – passed in the name of the people, their judgements are meant to reflect public opinion. The question thus arises as to whether long periods of either dwindling or stable crime figures allow policymakers and the courts to soften punishments for specific offences and to place, for example, the notion of offender-victim compensation and offender resocialisation at the forefront. There is thus every reason to raise awareness of the relationship between the media and the perceptions of crime. The German Police Crime Statistics for the last 10 years indicate a strong downward trend in the number of crimes that people perceive as very threatening or generally worrying. There has been a 45 percent reduction both in the number of break-ins in private homes and in bank robberies. In the past l0 years, the number of murders has dropped by around 41 percent. Car thefts are down by as much as 70 percent. While other offences like fraud have increased, there has been a slight overall reduction in the number of crimes recorded since 1993. In the light of our ageing society, this hardly comes as a surprise. In the past decade, the 18 to 30 age group - a group which in 1993, for example, made up almost half of all crime suspects - has shrunk from 9.4 to 7 percent of the population. Conversely, there has been a strong increase (from 20.4 to 24.4 percent) in the numer of people aged 60 and over a group that accounts for less than 3 percent of all violent crime suspects. Germany's ageing society is evidently good for domestic security. Another significant preventive effect is the stabillsation in migration since 1993. Positive trends of the type indicated for the last 10 years can, of course, only influence crime policy if they shape the public debate on crime and are made known to a broad majority of the population. But this is not always the case. Whether or not crime is on the increase or the decrease is not usually something most people are aware of. Unlike the rise and fall of fuel prices that we can all observe at local filling stations, crime is a social phenomenon that often happens out of public view. Even when crime occurs in public, say graffiti spraying on the walls of buildings, drug dealing in open spaces, and mass hooliganism among drunken football fans, even those who regularly observe such events can at best estimate their frequency based on the world they see. The limited geographical scope of their personal experience does not allow them to make a reliable assessment of trends in the occurrence and the gravity of such offences. This is certainly the case as regards serious crimes that occur less frequently. In assessing the situation, members of the general public must rely entirely on what is reported by the mass media. The question arises, therefore, as to how people perceive current trends in crime and what role the media play in influencing their judgement.

Keywords

PL

polityka karna; przestępczość; media; opinia publiczna; crime; crime policy; society; crime perception; public opinion; polityka karna; przestępczość; media; opinia publiczna; crime; crime policy; society; crime perception; public opinion

EN

media; crime; crime policy; society; crime perception; public opinion

• Publisher: Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN / Institute of Legal Studies PAN
• Journal: Archiwum Kryminologii
• Year: 2006
• Issue: XXVIII
• Pages: 33-55

Dates

published

2006-01-29

Contributors

author

Christian Pfeiffer

author

Michael Windzio

author

Matthias Kleimann

References

• Albrecht H.-J., Öffentliche Meinung, Kriminalpolitik und Kriminaljustiz [w:] M. Walter, H. Kania, H.-J. Albrecht, Alltagsvorstellungen von Kriminalität. Individuelle und gesellschaftliche Bedeutung der Kriminalitätsbilder für die Lebensgestaltung, LIT, Münster 2004.
• Council of Europe, Space I: Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics, Strasbourg 2004.
• Delzer I., Jugendgewalt vor Gericht. Eine Analyse der staatsanwaltschaftlichen und gerichtlichen Erledigungspraxis gegenüber jugendlichen und heranwachsenden Beschuldigten von Raub- und qualifizierten Körperverletzungsdelikten in Hannover, Hamburg, Leipzig und Stuttgart, nieopublikowany raport końcowy, KFN, Hannover 2004, w przygotowaniu.
• Derwein Ch., Wie wird Kriminalität in der Presse dargestellt, ist die Darstellung wirklichkeitsfremd und gibt es Entsprechungen im Vorstellungsbild der Bevölkerung?, Uniwersytet we Frankfurcie, Frankfurt 1995, praca doktorska z dziedziny prawa.
• Ditton J., Chadee D., Farrall S., Gilchrist E., Bannister J., From imitation to intimidation: A note on the curious and changing relationship between the media, crime and fear of crime, ,,British Journal of Criminology” 2004, t. 44, nr 4.
• Dodd T., Nicholas S., Povey D., Walker A., Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004, Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty, London 2004.
• Dreher E., Zur Spielraumtheorie als der Grundlage der Strafzumessungslehre des Bundesgerichtshofes, ,,JuristenZeitung” 1967, t. 22, nr 2.
• Galtung J., Ruge M.H., The structure of foreign news. The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crisis in four Norwegian newspapers, ,,Journal of Peace Research” 1965, t. 2, nr 1.
• Garland D., The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
• Gerhard H., Programmanalysen im Vergleich. Anmerkungen zu Unterschieden in Methode, Aufgabenstellung und Ergebnissen, ,,Media Perspektiven” 1999, nr 7.
• Glaze L.E., Palla S., Probation and Parole in the United States, 2003, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington D.C. 2004.
• Home Office, Prison Statistics England and Wales 2002, Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty, London 2004.
• International Center for Prison Studies, Prison Brief for United Kingdom, England and Wales 2004. Dostęp online: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/rel/icps/worldbrief/europe_records.php?code=168.
• Krüger U.M., Unterschiedliches Informationsverständnis im öffentlich-rechtlichen und privaten Fernsehen, ,,Media Perspektiven” 2000, nr 7 .
• Krüger U.M., Zapf-Schramm Th., Die Boulevardisierungskluft im deutschen Fernsehen, ,,Media Perspektiven” 2001, nr 7 .
• Krüger U.M., Zapf-Schramm Th., Inhalte und Gestaltung öffentlich-rechtlicher und privater Informationsangebote im Fernsehen, ,,Media perspektiven” 2003, nr 12.
• Long J.S., Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Sage, London 1991.
• Ludwig-Mayerhofer W., Niemann H., Gleiches (Straf-)Recht für alle? Neue Ergebnisse zur Ungleichbehandlung ausländischer Jugendlicher im Strafrecht der Bundesrepublik, ,,Zeitschrift für Soziologie” 2000, nr 1.
• Maelicke B., Der Strafvollzug und die Neue Wirklichkeit, ,,Zeitschrift für Strafvollzug und Straffälligenhilfe” 1999, t. 48, nr 2.
• Morris N., Crime, the Media and our Public Discourse. Perspectives on Crime and Justice 1996-1997 Lecture Series, U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington D.C. 1997.
• Pfeiffer Ch., Dämonisierung des Bösen, ,,Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” 2004 z 5 marca.
• Pfeiffer Ch., Kleimann M., Petersen S., Schott T., Probleme der Kriminalität bei Migranten und integrationspolitische Konsequenzen. Raport ekspertów dla niemieckiej Federalnej Rady Imigracyjnej i Integracyjnej, Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen, Hannover 2004.
• Pfeiffer Ch., Kriminalprävention im Jugendgerichtsverfahren, Heymann, Köln 1983.
• Rennison M.C., Rand M.R., Criminal Victimization, 2002, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington D.C. 2003.
• Reuband K.H., Kriminalität als Thema ostdeutscher Massenmedien vor und nach der Wende. Eine Analyse Dresdner Tageszeitungen 1988-1994, ,,Kriminologisches Journal” 2000, t. 32, nr 1.
• Reuband K.H., Kriminalität in den Medien. Erscheinungsformen, Nutzungsstruktur und Auswirkungen auf die Kriminalitätsfurcht, ,,Soziale Probleme” 1998, t. 9, nr 2.
• Reuband K.H., Objektive und subjektive Bedrohung durch Kriminalität. Ein Vergleich der Kriminalitätsfurcht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den USA 1965-1990, ,,Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie” 1992, nr 44.
• Roberts J.V., Doob A.N., News media influences on public views of sentencing, „Law and Human Behavior” 1990, nr 14.
• Roberts J.V., Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice, ,,Crime and Justice” 1992, nr 16.
• Roberts J.V., Stalans L.J., Crime, criminal justice, and public opinion [w:] M. Tonry (red.), The Handbook of crime and Punishment, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998.
• Sack F., Governing through crime?, praca zaprezentowana na Sympozjum zorganizowanym przez Arbeitskreises Junger Kriminologen (AJK), 11-13 września 2003 r.
• Scharf W., Mühlenfeld H.-U., Stockmann R. Zur Kriminalitätsberichterstattung in der Presse, ,,Publizistik” 1999, t. 44, nr 4.
• Schott T., Loebmann R., Goergen Th., Suhling S., Pfeiffer Ch., Der Anstieg der Gefangenzahlen in Niedersachsen und Schleswig Holstein - Folge der Kriminalitätsentwicklung oder unterschiedlicher Strafhärte?, nieopublikowany raport końcowy, KFN, Hannover 2004.
• Schulze G., Die Erlebnisgesellschaft, Campus, Frankfurt am Main 1992.
• Streng F., Die heranwachsende Juristengeneration und die Aufgabe des Strafrechts, ,,Bewährungshilfe” 2000, nr 4.
• Suhling S., Schott T., Ansatzpunkte zur Erklärung der gestiegenen Gefangenenzahlen in Deutschland [w:] M. Bereswill, W. Greve, Forschungsthema Strafvollzug, Nomos, Baden-Baden 2001.
• Travis J., Solomon A.L., Waul M., From Prison to Home. The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry, The Urban Institute, Washington D.C. 2001.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7420/AK2005-2006B