Polityka karna, kultura polityczna a zasady konstytucyjne

• Authors: Michael H. Tonry

Title variants

EN

Penal Policy, Political Culture, and Constitutional Obsolescence

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

Rapid increases in imprisonment rates and the adoption of severe penal policies in some countries have, in recent years, prompted a burgeoning scholarly literature on the determinants of penal policy. However, much of this literature may be asking the wrong question. The authors typically focussed on the causes of harsher penal policies and offered explanations. However, it seems more reasonable to ask what recent changes in penal policy tell us about the country itself. The paper shows that crossnational differences in penal policy tell us important things about differences in penal culture, and that decisive changes in penal culture may both indicate and portend major, and sometimes regrettable, changes in larger political cultures. The paper has been divided into three sections, each addressing a separate question. The first considers the reasons for penal policies in Britain, Australia, the U.S., and elsewhere becoming harsher over the final three decades of the twentieth century. The short answer is that the question is based on a false premise. Only in some places did penal policies become harsher and in importantly different ways. The assumption that penal policies everywhere tightened over that period is wrong. The second addresses the questions of why penal policies in particular countries did and did not become more severe. A wide range of explanations are available. They range from national differences in constitutional arrangements, the organisation of criminal justice systems, the nature of the mass media, and the nature of national politics to fortuities of personality and event. The key points, however, are that, at day's end, policies are chosen and choices have consequences. The third question is why policy choices matter. One answer, of course, is that they matter because they affect what happens to individual human beings. Another important reason why they matter is that policies adopted and implemented sometimes change the world and sometimes change the ways people think. Repressive policies, rationalised and justified, and in due course followed, desensitise us to the reasons why at the outset they appeared to be repressive and make it easier, when new controversial issues about crime control policies arise, to adopt even more repressive policies. America, over the past 30 years, England for the past 15 years, and other countries for different periods, have through their changes in penal policies changed their penal cultures in ways that portend ill for the future.

Keywords

PL

polityka karna; kultura polityczna; zasady konstytucyjne; prizonizacja; penal policy; political culture; constitutional obsolescence; polityka karna; kultura polityczna; zasady konstytucyjne; prizonizacja; penal policy; political culture; constitutional obsolescence

EN

penal policy; political culture; constitutional obsolescence

• Publisher: Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN / Institute of Legal Studies PAN
• Journal: Archiwum Kryminologii
• Year: 2006
• Issue: XXVIII
• Pages: 95-110

Dates

published

2006-01-29

Contributors

author

Michael H. Tonry

References

• Albrecht H.-J., Post-adjudication dispositions in comparative perspective [w:] M. Tonry, R. Frase (red.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Ashworth A., The decline of English sentencing and other stories [w:] M. Tonry, R. Frase (red.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Blumstein A., Cohen J., Martin S., Tonry M., Research on Sentencing, National Academy Press, Washington D.C. 1983.
• Dauvergne M., Homicide in Canada, 2003, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Ottawa 2004.
• Doob A.N., Webster Ch.M., Explaining forty years of stability in Canada's imprisonment rate [w:] M. Tonry (red.). Punishment and Penal Culture in Western Countries, t. III: Crime and Justice - A Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2006, (w przygotowaniu).
• Garland D., The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2001.
• Garland D., The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. ,,British Journal of Criminology” 1996, t. 36, nr 4.
• Hamai K., Prison population in Japan stable for 30 years [w:] M. Tonry (red.), Penal Reform in Overcrowded Times, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Home office, Justice for All, Cm. 5563, London 2002.
• Kensey A., Tournier P., French prison numbers stable since 1998, but populations changing [w:] M. Tonry (red.), Penal Reform in Overcrowded Times, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Lappi-Seppälä T., Punishment and prisoner rates in Scandinavia [w:] M. Tonry (red.), Punishment and Penal Culture in Western Countries, t. III: Crime and Justice - A Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2006, (w przygotowaniu).
• Lappi-Seppälä T., Sentencing and punishment in Finland. The decline of the repressive ideal [w:] M. Tonry, R. Frase (red.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Lijphart A., Patterns of Democracy, Yale University Press, New Haven 1999.
• Reitz K., The disassembly and reassembly of U.S. sentencing practices” [w:] M. Tonry, R. Frase (red.), Sentencing and Sanction in Western Countries, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Savelsberg J., Knowledge, domination and punishment, ,,American Journal of Sociology” 1994, t. 99, nr 4.
• Shane-DuBow S., Brown A.P., Olsen E., Sentencing Reform in the United States. History, Content and Effect, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. 1985.
• Smith D.J., Less crime without more punishment, ,,Edinburgh Law Review” 1999, nr 3.
• Tak P.J., Sentencing and punishment in the Netherlands [w:] M. Tonry, R. Frase (red.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Tonry M, Why aren't German penal policies harsher and imprisonment rates higher, ,,German Law Journal” 2004, nr 5.
• Tonry M., Punishment and Politics, Willan, Cullompton 2004.
• Tonry M., Thinking about Crime, Oxford University Press, New York 2004.
• U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics - 2003,Washington 2004.
• Vonnegut K., Matka noc, przeł. Lech Jęczmyk, Niezależna Oficyna Wydawnicza, Warszawa 1984.
• Vonnegut K., Mother Night, Delacorte Press, New York 1961.
• Weigend Th., Sentencing and punishment in Germany [w:] M. Tonry, R. Frase (red.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7420/AK2005-2006E