The dawning of a new era in social reaction to crime: promise, potential and limitations of restorative justice

• Authors: Ezzat A. Fattah
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Despite dramatic social changes and unprecedented technological innovations penal philosophy has undergone little change. Retribution continues to be the key principle in sentencing and judges continue their hopeless struggle to make the punishment fit the crime. It is truly baffling that the CJS has remained archaic in its philosophy, its outlook and its tools and has remained insulated from whatever changes and advances that had taken place in modern society? For as yet unexplained reasons the system has resisted every attempt to modernize and change? This is probably why it is that despite the manifest advantages and benefits of R.J. over a punitive, retributive system, whose sole aim is to inflict pain and suffering on the wrong-doer, there is still reluctance to do away with the ideas of expiation and penitence in favor of reconciliation and compensation. The strong support for victims of crime, coupled with the undeniable fact that victims are the main losers in a punitive system of justice, have not yet succeeded in convincing politicians, lawmakers or the general public of the need to replace the medieval practice of punishment by a more constructive, more peaceful and less harmful means of dealing with crime and conflict. And yet, the destructive and detrimental effects of punishment are too evident to ignore. All this suggests that the time is right for a paradigm shift in society’s response to crime. There is a desperate need to move from philosophical abstraction to restorative action, from senseless retribution to meaningful restitution, from just deserts to restorative justice. But there is also a need for realism. R.J. is not a pana-cea. Although superior in every respect to retribution R.J. does have certain limitations and there are certain dangers to be avoided when moving towards the full implementation of a restorative justice system.

Keywords

EN

social reaction to crime; criminology; victim

PL

sprawiedliwość naprawcza; polityka kryminalna; zapobieganie przestępczości; social reaction to crime; criminology; victim; sprawiedliwość naprawcza; polityka kryminalna; zapobieganie przestępczości; social reaction to crime; criminology; victim

• Publisher: Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN / Institute of Legal Studies PAN
• Journal: Archiwum Kryminologii
• Year: 2012
• Issue: XXXIV
• Pages: 7-42

Dates

published

2012-01-01

Contributors

author

Ezzat A. Fattah

References

• Beccaria, Cesare. Dei Delitti e Delle Pene. 1st edition published anonymously!
• Christie, N. Confl icts as Property. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 17, no. 1
• Christie, N. Limits to Pain. Oxford University Press
• Clear, T. R. Harm in American Penology: offenders, Victims and their Communities. Albany: State University of New York Press
• Council of Europe Median in Penal Matters. Recommendation No. R (99) and Explanatory Memorandum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe
• Davis, Angela Are Prisons Obsolete? Seven Stories Press
• Davis, G. Making Amends: Mediation and reparation in Criminal Justice. London: Routledge
• Dittenhoffer, T. & Ericson, R. The Victim/Offender Reconciliation Programme: A message to the correctional reformers. In E.A. Fattah (ed.) Towards A Critical Victimology. London: Macmillan & New York: St. Martin’s Press
• Drucker, Ernest A Plague of Prisons. The Epidemiology of Mass Incarceration in America. The New Press
• Moving to the Right: a Return to Punishment? Crime and Justice
• Making the Punishment fi t the Crime: The Case of Imprisonment. Problems Inherent in the use of Imprisonment as a Retributive Sanction. Canadian Journal of Criminology
• Public Opposition to Prison Alternatives and Community Corrections: A Strategy for Action. Canadian Journal of Criminology
• Beyond Metaphysics: The Need for a New Paradigm. On Actual and Potential Contributions of Criminology and the Social Sciences to the Reform of the Criminal Law. In R. Lahti and K. Nuotio (eds.) Criminal Law Theory in Transition, Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers Publishing Company
• From a Guilt Orientation to a Consequence Orientation. In F. Denker et. al. (eds.). Beiträge zur Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg. C.F. Muller
• Restorative and Retributive Justice Models: A Comparison. In H-H. Kühne (ed.) Festschrift für Koichi Miyazawa. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
• From Crime Policy to Victim Policy – The Need for a Fundamental Policy Change. In M. McShane and F. Williams III (eds.). Victims of Crime and the Victimization Process. N.Y: Garland Publishing
• Toward a Victim Policy Aimed at Healing not Suffering. In R.C. Davis, A.J. Lurigio and W.G. Skogan (eds.), Victims of Crime (second edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
• Criminology: Past, Present and Future – A Critical Overview (1997) London: Macmillan, New York: St. Martin’s Press
• Restorative and Retributive Justice Models: A Comparison. In Fattah, E.A. & Peters, T. (eds.), Support for Crime Victims in a Comparative Perspective. Leuven: Leuven University Press, Belgium
• Some Refl ections on the Paradigm of Restorative Justice and its Viability for Juvenile Justice. In Lode Walgrave (ed.). Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Potentialities, Risks and Problems. Leuven: Leuven University Press
• Victim Redress and Victim-Offender Reconciliation in Theory and Practice: Some Personal Refl ections. The Hokkaigakuen Law Journal. Vol. XXXV, No 1
• From a handful of Dollars to tea and Sympathy: The Sad History of Victim Assistance. In J.J.M. Van Dijk, Ron G.H. Van Kaam and Joanne Wemmers (eds.). Caring for Crime Victims: Selected Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Victimology. Monsey, N.Y.: Criminal Justice Press
• Mediation in Penal Matters. Report for Correctional Services Canada. Ottawa
• a Victim Redress and Victim-Offender Reconciliation in Theory and Practice- Some Personal Refl ections. Resource Material Series no. 56. Fuchu/ Tokyo: UNAFEI (Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders)
• b How Valid are the Arguments Frequently Made Against Mediation and Restorative Justice? In Hedda Giertsen (ed.). Albanian and Norwegian Experiences with Mediation in Confl ict. Oslo: Dept. of Criminology, Univ. of Oslo
• From Philosophical Abstraction to Restorative Action – From Senseless Retribution to Meaningful Restitution. Just Desert and Restorative Justice revisited. In H.J. Kerner and E. Weitekanp (eds.), Restorative Justice, Theoretical Foundations, Willan Publishing, Culmcott House, Devon, U.K
• Gearing Justice Action to Victim Satisfaction. Contrasting Two Justice Philosophies: Retribution and Redress. In Hendrik Kaptein & Marijke Malsch (eds.) Crime, Victims and Justice – Essays on Principles and Practice. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company
• Is punishment the appropriate response to gross human rights violations? Is a non-punitive justice system feasible? In Restorative Justice: Politics, Policies and Prospects. Eds.: E. van der Spuy, S. Parmentier, A. Dissel. Published under the auspices of the Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town. (JUTA and Co). Reprinted in ACTA JURIDICA (Cape Town)
• Is Restorative Justice a Viable Option in Crimes of Violence? Published in a special issue of Keio University Law Journal dedicated to the memory of Prof. Koichi Miyazawa
• Presser, L. & Gaarder, E. Can Restorative Justice Reduce Battering? Some Preliminary Considerations. Social Justice, Vol. 27, no. 1
• Ranish, D. & Schichor, D. The Victim’s Role in the Penal Process: Recent developments in California. In E.A. Fattah (ed.) Towards A Critical Victimology. London: Macmillan & New York: St. Martin’s Press
• Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press
• Siems, Larry The Torture Report
• Sykes, G. M. The Pains of Imprisonment. In L. Radzinowicz & M.E. Wolfgang (eds.) Crime & Justice (Vol. 3) The Criminal in confi nement. New York: Basic Press
• Tonry, M. The prospects for institutionalization of restorative justice initiatives in western countries. In Aertsen, I.; Daems, T. And Robert, L. (eds.) Institutionalizing Restorative Justice. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing

Identifiers

DOI

10.7420/AK2012A