Legitymizacja Policji w Polsce na tle europejskich badań empirycznych

• Authors: Daria Wójcik , Janina Czapska , Ewa Radomska

Title variants

EN

The Legitimacy of the Police against a Background of European Empirical Research

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The most general perspective on the legitimacy of a social institution relies upon theacceptance that the legitimised subject has a right to govern, and that the governed recognise that right. Understanding it this way, legitimacy can be analysed from twoperspectives: normative when it concerns objective criteria that permit evaluationwhen the institution is legitimate (normative foundations for its appointmentsand rules for its functioning); and empirical, when it pertains to the awareness ofcitizens that a particular institution is legitimate. Over the last 25 years, a numberof important works on the subject of legitimacy of the police were understood viaempirical means. Based upon these, one can differentiate two opposing approachestowards police-citizen relations. Although both rely on collaboration, they indicatealternate conditions which might determine this. The first approach instrumentallycharacterises itself as achieved by citizens using a cost-benefit analysis of the results ofworking with the police; citizens are more amenable to co-operation when the possiblebenefits are higher than the incurred costs. From this perspective, citizens accept theactivities of the police and declare a willingness to work with them, if in their eyes thepolice are applying realistic sanctions towards people who disturb the norms of the law,are fighting effectively against criminal and undesirable behaviours, and are treating allcitizens in an equal manner. Different motives for working with the police accompanycitizens in their attitudes to trials. In this case, co-operation results from internalrecognition of the legitimacy of the police by citizens. If citizens believe their policeto be legitimate, they will be more inclined to co-operate with them and obey the law.Legitimacy results here, above all, from the conviction that the police are fulfilling theirduty in a just procedural manner.The most empirically-supported research into attitudes about trials has beendetermined by the American model by T.R. Tyler. Legitimacy in his view assumes trusttowards police by citizens and their internal convictions about service in regards totheir recommendations. Understood this way, legitimacy is strongly determined by thefairness of police procedures, and is itself an essential influence on the willingness ofcitizens to co-operate with the police and their readiness to abide by their laws.After a period of domination in police research about the concept of legitimacybeing strongly linked to procedural fairness, there were attempts at revising andmodifying this theory. An alternative to Tyler’s definition of police legitimacy wasproposed by British researchers J. Jackson and B. Bradford. In their view, the police’slegitimacy is formed from three elements: internal conviction about police services,shared social value of the police, and the legality of the police’s activities. However,to independently differentiate, police legitimacy produces here the same effects as inTyler’s concept, and so determines for citizens their willingness to co-operate with thepolice and their readiness to abide by the law.Presented in the following study of research on the legitimacy of the police,a methodology is given for testing both of the previously-mentioned concepts, i.e.Tyler’s model, where trust of the police is a basic element of legitimacy, and Jacksonand Bradford’s model, where trust is treated as a separate social phenomenon, thoughit is linked with the legitimacy of many related factors. The fundamental goal of thepresented research determined however to attempt answering questions about whichtheoretical principles of the procedural model of police legitimacy, including former ARCHIVES OF CRIMINOLOGY 379foreign research within this scope, do they find applied in the Polish socio-culturalcontext. Polish research was undertaken in 2013 under the auspices of the internationalresearch project “Legitimacy Policing and Criminal Justice in Central and EuropeanEurope” amongst 374 law students from various academic centres via an online survey.The research had an exploratory character and was to establish a starting point forfurther research into the legitimacy of the police in Polish society.

Keywords

PL

legitymizacja Policji; Policja; the Police; legitimacy of the Police; legitymizacja Policji; Policja; the Police; legitimacy of the Police

EN

the Police; legitimacy of the Police

• Publisher: Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN / Institute of Legal Studies PAN
• Journal: Archiwum Kryminologii
• Year: 2015
• Issue: XXXVII
• Pages: 71-100

Dates

published

2015-01-01

Contributors

author

Daria Wójcik

author

Janina Czapska

author

Ewa Radomska

References

• G. Andrighetto, R. Conte, Cognitive dynamics of norm compliance. From norm adoption to flexible automated conformity, “Artificial Intelligence and Law” 2012, nr 4(20).
• A. Bain, B.K. Robinson, J. Conser, Perceptions of policing: Improving communication in local communities, “International Journal of Police Science & Management” 2014, nr 4(16).
• D. Beetham, The legitimation of power, Macmillan, London 1991, introduction.
• J. Czapska, Na czym polega internalizacja normy?, w: M. Dudek, M. Stępień (red.), Aksjologiczny wymiar prawa, Nomos.
• D. Harkin, Police legitimacy, ideology and qualitative methods: A critique of procedural justice theory, “Criminology & Criminal Justice” 2015, 13 kwietnia 2015, na stronie: http://crj.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/ 04/10/1748895815580397.full.pdf+html [dostęp: 12.07.2015].
• F. Heidensohn, M. Silvestri, Crime and gender, w: M. Maguire, R. Morgan, R. Reinder (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
• L. Hinds, J. Fleming, Crime victimization and police legitimacy: The importance of beliefs and experience, 27 września 2006, na stronie: http://www.victimsclearinghouse.nsw.gov.au/Pages/victims_clearinghouse_research_db/victims_clear inghouse_research_database_servicedelivery/victims_clearinghouse_research_database_servicedelivery_hinds_crime.aspx [dostęp: 12.07.2015].
• L. Hinds, Youth, police legitimacy and informal contacts, “Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology” 2009, nr 1(24).
• T. Hirschi, M. Gottfredson, Age and the Explanation of Crime, “The American Journal of Sociology” 1983, nr 89(3).
• M. Hough, J. Jackson, B. Bradford, A. Myhill, P. Quinton, Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy, “Polic-ing: A journal of Policy and Practice” 2010, nr 4(3).
• M. Hough, J. Jackson, B. Bradford, Legitimacy, trust and compliance: An empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European Social Survey, w: J. Tankebe, A. Liebling (red.), Legitimacy and criminal justice. An international explora-tion, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013.
• J. Jackson, B. Bradford, M. Hough, J. Kuha, S. Stares, S. Widdop, R. Fitzgerald, M. Yordanova, T. Galev, Developing eu-ropean indicators of trust in justice, “European Journal of Criminology” 2011, nr 8(4).
• J. Jackson, B. Bradford, Police legitimacy: A conceptual review, 29 września 2010, na stronie: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1684507 [dostęp: 12.07.2015] .
• J. Jackson, On the dual motivational force of legitimate authority, w: B.H. Bornstein, A.J. Tomkins (eds.), Cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust. 62nd Nebraska symposium on motivation, Springer, New York 2015.
• D.S. Kirk, M. Matsuda, Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and ecology of arrest, “Criminology” 2011, nr 2(49).
• G. Meško, J. Šifrer, Law students’ perception of police legitimacy, trust in the police and legal cynicism in countries of Central Eastern Europe, 13 września 2013, na stronie: https://www.cepol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/04-law-students.pdf [dostęp: 12.07.2015].
• G. Meško, K. Eman, Legitimacy of Policing in Eastern Europe: Results from a Cross-National Law Student Survey, w: G. Meško, J. Tankebe (red.), Trust and legitimacy in Criminal Justice: An International Perspective, Springer, New York 2015.
• A.E. Nivette, M. Eisner, T. Malti, D. Ribeaud, The social and developmental antecedents of legal cynicism, “Journal of Re-search in Crime and Delinquency” 2015, nr 2(52).
• M.D. Reisig, J. Tankebe, G. Meško, Procedural justice, Police legitimacy, and public cooperation with the police among young Slovene adults, “Journal of Criminal Justice and Security” 2012, nr 2(14).
• A. Rychard, Stare i nowe hipotezy o legitymizacji i zaufaniu, w: A. Rychard, H. Domański (red.), Legitymizacja w Polsce. Nieustający kryzys w zmieniających się warunkach?, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa 2010.
• R.J. Sampson, D.J. Bartusch, Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighbourhood Context of Racial Differences, “Law and Society Review” 1998, nr 4(32).
• T.R. Tyler, Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimization, “Annual Review of Psychology” 2006, nr 57.
• T.R. Tyler, Psychology and the design of legal institutions, Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen 2007.
• T.R. Tyler, S. Blader, Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioural engagement, Psychology Press, Philadelphia 2000.
• T.R. Tyler, S.J. Schulhofer, A. Huq, Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counter-terrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans, “Law and Society Review” 2010, nr 2(44).
• T.R. Tyler, Why people obey the law, Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1990.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7420/AK2015C