Mistrz i uczeń w czasach nauki masowej i skomercjalizowanej

• Authors: Janusz Goćkowski

Title variants

EN

Master and pupil at the time of mass and commercial science

Abstracts

EN

The character of the master–pupil arrangement was discussed as the elementary microstructure of the world of participants in the game whose aim is the scientific truth. A model of master and pupil's “contract” that is consistent with the essence of that game, and especially a list of rights that both sides of such a “contract” have were presented. University was pointed to as a typical institution that creates and perfects “master–pupil” arrangements. It was also pointed that such an arrangement is a little school of ethics, etiquette and epistemic, characteristic of the circles of participants in the game played for scientific truth. Threats were also discussed for the “master–pupil” arrangement that come from the “great science”, as well as from the “mass democracy”, “mass man”, “mass thinking”, “mass production” and “mass organisation” with inclinations for a “gardener's” understanding and treatment of social problems. Harmfulness of the advantage of the “superior–subordinate” arrangement over the one of “master–pupil” was mentioned as well as the threat to identity of the process of “rearing scholars” under the conditions of replacing the “master–pupil” arrangement with the one “patron–customer”. Finally, reasonableness of playing for maintaining the identity of chosen fields of the academic science was discussed, since what is called science is divided into those fields (also greatly corroded by now) and great areas of technology sensu largo. The presented considerations were linked to the question of crisis of the Western civilisation.

Keywords

PL

mistrz–uczeń; przełożony–podwładny; patron–klient; nauka akademicka; wychowywanie uczonych; nauka masowa; człowiek masowy; demokracja masowa; biurokratyzacja nauki; komercjalizacja nauki

EN

master–pupil; superior–subordinate; patron–customer; academic science; rearing scholars; mass science; mass man; mass democracy; bureaucratisation ofscience; commercialisation of science

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
• Journal: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
• Year: 2000-2001
• Volume: 28-29
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 49-67

Dates

published

2000-2001

Contributors

author

Janusz Goćkowski

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

References

• Bloom A., Umysł zamknięty, Poznań 1997.
• Goćkowski J., Autorytety świata uczonych, Warszawa 1984.
• Goćkowski J., Ethos nauki i role uczonych, Kraków 1997.
• Goćkowski J., Uniwersytet i tradycje w nauce, Kraków 1999.
• Husserl E., Kryzys europejskiego społeczeństwa a filozofia, Warszawa 1993.
• Husserl E., Kryzys nauk europejskich i fenomenologia transcendentalna, Kraków 1987.
• Kierowanie pracą zespołową w nauce, pod red. A. Matejki, Warszawa 1967.
• Kłoskowska A., Kultura masowa, Warszawa 1964.
• Mannheim K., Człowiek i społeczeństwo w dobie przebudowy, Warszawa 1974.
• OrtegayGasset J., Bunt mas, Warszawa 1982.
• Ossowscy M. i S., Nauka o nauce, w: S. Ossowski, Dzieła, t. IV, Onauce, Warszawa 1967.
• Snow C. P., Dwie kultury, Warszawa 1999.
• SollaPrice D. J. de, Mała Nauka – Wielka Nauka, Warszawa 1967.
• Znaniecki F., Społeczne role uczonych, Warszawa 1984.
• Znaniecki F., Upadek cywilizacji zachodniej, w: tenże, Pisma filozoficzne, t. I, Warszawa 1991.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

1857687