An exploratory case study to investigate perceived pronunciation errors in Thai primary school students using audio-visual speech recognition

• Authors: Steven Graham

Abstracts

EN

An explorative case study has been conducted at a small rural school in the north east of Thailand to investigate the pronunciation errors that primary school students make when reading English aloud. This paper illustrates the opportunities and challenges of employing speech recognition software in rural classrooms by using it with specifically designed audio-visual materials based on the Thai curriculum to identify English language reading and pronunciation difficulties. A comparison is made between this study and published literature.

Keywords

EN

Speech recognition software; audio visual; English; computer assisted language learning

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 3-18

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Steven Graham

• American University of Phnom Penh, Cambodia

References

• Aziz, H. (2010). The 5 keys to educational technology. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/articles/2010/09/16/the-5-keys-to-educational-technology.aspx
• Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching, 44(1), 36-54. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444810000339.
• Barber, D., & Foord, D. (2010). Learning coach. English Teaching Professional, 71, 53-54.
• Beaumont, J. (2010). A sequence of critical thinking tasks. TESOL Journal, 1(4), 427-448. DOI: 10.5054/tj2010.234763.
• Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Casserly, E. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Speech perception and production. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(5), 629-647. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.63.
• Cawkell, T. (1999). Tracking fast-moving technology: The progress of speech recognition. Journal of Information Science, 25(1), 79-84. DOI: 10.1177/016555159902500108.
• Chapelle, C. A., & Chung, Y-R. (2010). The promise of NLP and speech processing technologies in language assessment. Language Testing, 27(3), 301-315. DOI: 10.1177/0265532210364405.
• Cimons, M. (2010). Understanding language development. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2010/07/22/understanding-language-development?PageNr=1
• Coleman, H. (2010). The English language in development. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/UK011-English-Language-Development.pdf
• Dala, H. S. (2009). The role of information and communication technology in academic libraries and the achievement of the millennium development goals (MDG). The Voice of Teachers, 1(2), 141-144.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Drager, K. (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7). DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00210.x. Retrieved from http://www.blackwell-compass.com/subject/linguistics/article_view?parent=section&last_results=section%3Dlnco-sociolinguistics&sortby=date&section=lnco-sociolinguistics&browse_id=lnco_articles_bpl210&article_id=lnco_articles_bpl210
• Elder, L. (2010). Achieving critical mass. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=414351
• File, K. A., & Adams, R. (2010). Should vocabulary instruction be integrated or isolated? TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 222-249. DOI: 10.5054/tq.2010.219943.
• Fox, W. S., & Grams, C. L. (2007). Work ethic as school-based behaviours of adolescent students. Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(1), 63-87. DOI: 10.1177/1077727X07303819.
• Franco, H., Bratt, H., Rossier, R., Gadde, V. R., Shriberg, E., Abrash, V., et al. (2010). EduSpeak: A speech recognition and pronunciation scoring toolkit for computer-aided language learning applications. Language Testing, 27(3), 401-418. DOI: 10.1177/0265532210364408.
• Fry, E. B., Kress, J. E., & Fountoukidis, D. L. (2000). Reading teacher's book of lists. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences new horizons. New York: Basic Books.
• Gentner, D., & Forbus, K. D. (2010). Computational models of analogy. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(3), 266-276. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.105.
• Ginther, A., Dimova, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379-399. DOI: 10.1177/0265532210364407.
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within human situated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X.
• Graddol, D. (2010). Will Chinese take over from English as the world's most important language? English Today, 26(4), 3-4.
• Graham, S. (2007). Proposed teacher training for primary school teachers of English in Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.steves-english-zone.com/images/Papers/proposed-teacher-training-for-primary-school-teachers-of-english-in-thailand.pdf
• Graham, S. (2009). From the bottom up: A case study of teacher training for primary school teachers of English in a Thai school in north eastern Thailand. English Language Teacher Education and Development, 12, 31-43.
• Graham, S. (2010). EIL in the primary classroom: Exploration and innovation using DVDs for communication. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 1(3), 506-523.
• Graham, S. (2013). Reflection and feedback: Primary school teachers of English take control. Humanising Language Teaching 15(5). Retrieved from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct13/mart01.htm
• Kennedy, T. J. (2006). Language learning and its impact on the brain: Connecting language learning with the mind through content-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 39(3), 471-486. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02900.x.
• Kim, Y-H. (2009). An investigation into native and non-native teachers' judgments of oral English performance: A mixed methods approach. Language Testing, 26(2), 187-217. DOI: 10.1177/0265532208101010.
• Kuhl, P., & Rivera-Gaxiola, M. (2008). Neural substrates of language acquisition. The Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 511-534. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094321.
• Kuhl, P. K. (2010). Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron, 67(5), 713-727. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.038.
• Li, R-C., & Topolewski, D. (2002). Zip & Terry: A new attempt at designing language learning simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 181-186. DOI: 10.1177/1046878102332006.
• Lotto, A., & Holt, L. (2010). Psychology of auditory perception. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(5), 479-489. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.123.
• Ma, A., & Pendergast, D. (2010). Innovative pedagogies for family and consumer science/home economics education - Utilising computer-based collaborative learning to foster lifelong learning attributes. Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 38(3), 273-288. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-3934.2009.00018.x.
• Mackenzie, A. S. (2002). EFL curriculum reform in Thailand. Paper presented at the Curriculum Innovation, Testing and Evaluation: Proceedings of the 1st Annual KALT Pan-Sig Conference, Kyoto, Japan.
• Marchand, Y., Adsett, C. R., & Damper, R. I. (2009). Automatic syllabification in English: A comparison of different algorithms. Language and Speech, 52(1), 1-27. DOI: 10.1177/0023830908099881.
• Mcinerney, V., Marsh, H. W., & Mcinerney, D. M. (1999). The designing of the computer anxiety and learning measure (Calm): Validating of scores on a multidimensional measure of anxiety and cognitions relating to adult learning of computing skills using structural equation modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(3), 451-470. DOI: 10.1177/00131649921969974.
• Mennen, I., Scobbie, J. M., de Leeuw, E., Shaeffler, S., & Schaeffler, F. (2010). Measuring language-specific phonetic settings. Second Language Research, 26(1), 13-41. DOI: 10.1177/0267658309337617.
• Muñoz, C., & Singleton, D. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44(1), 1-35. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444810000327.
• Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Office of the National Education Commission. (2012). National Education Act 1999. Retrieved April 12, 2015, from Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment: http://www.onesqa.or.th/en/publication/nation_edbook.pdf
• Pavlichev, A. (2002). Software review. Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 93-98. DOI: 10.1177/089443930202000109.
• Phillips, E. M. (1993). Polite requests: Second language textbooks and learners of French. Foreign Language Annals, 26(3), 372-381. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb02293.x.
• Piaget, J. (1923). The language and the thought of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
• Pinter, A. (2006). Teaching young language learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Potcharapanpong, S., & Thongthew, S. (2010). TEFL training program for local and cultural-based instruction: Case studies in Thai primary schools. Asian Social Science, 6(9), 39-48.
• Quinn, Q. (2007). Technology and motivation: Can computers motivate students to read? Retrieved from http://www.compasslearning.com/CompassFileUpload/60Technology_Motivation.pdf
• Richards, J. C. (2006). Materials development and research-making the connection. RELC Journal, 37(1), 5-26. DOI: 10.1177/0033688206063470.
• Riehl, C. M. (2010). The mental representation of bilingualism. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(5), 750-758. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.74.
• Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning. Infancy, 15(6), 608-635. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00033.x.
• Shen, H-J. (2003). The role of explicit instruction in ESL/EFL reading. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 424-433. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02124.x.
• Shenk, D. (2010). The genius in all of us. New York: Doubleday.
• Smythe, D. (1987). Thai speakers. In M. Swan, & B. Smith (Eds.), Learner English: A teacher's guide to interference and other problems (pp. 252-263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Snyder, J. W. (1971). Who learns most? Foreign Language Annals, 4(4), 379-384. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1971.tb02054.x.
• Spark, S. (2010). Science grows on acquiring new language. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/10/22/09window_ep.h30.html?tkn=NSOF+.com
• Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Stephenson, H. (1994). Management and participation in ELT projects. ELT Journal, 48(3), 225-232. DOI: 10.1093/elt/48.3.225.
• Techavijit, V. (2010, December 10). Only happy schools produce well rounded leaders. Bangkok Post. Retrieved from http://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/education-features/210701/only-happy-schools-produce-well-rounded-leaders
• Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas-Autonomy.html
• The Ministry of Education, Thailand. (2008, July 11). Assumption College Thonburi. Retrieved March 5, 2017, from http://www.act.ac.th/document/1741.pdf
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society, the development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

2087181