It has potential but…’ – exploring university students’ experiences and perceptions of breakout rooms during the COVID-19 pandemic

• Authors: Christine Savvidou , Katarzyna Alexander

Abstracts

EN

COVID-19 has created a dramatic and rapid transition to emergency remote teaching in higher education (HE) creating both new opportunities and challenges for lecturers and their students. As HE adapts to these new circumstances, there is a need for instructors to design and teach classes that support collaborative learning and increase opportunities for student interactivity. This article reports on an ongoing study exploring university students’ experiences and perceptions of using breakout rooms (BRs), a technical feature of many synchronous online platforms, as part of their online classes. Using a mixed methods research approach, 127 students, who were registered on English language courses at a university in Cyprus during Spring 2021, participated in the study. Findings indicate that students’ experiences and perceptions of breakout rooms during this period were impacted in five key areas: (1) emotional/affective, (2) moral/ethical, (3) social, (4) pedagogical and (5) technological. These findings suggest that students’ personal feelings, attitudes to online learning, sense of connectedness to their peers, expectations of the role and presence of the lecturer and issues relating to the technology, are all considered to be significant factors in their use of BRs. This study offers initial insights for educators who wish to use, modify and/or adapt synchronous online teaching to incorporate collaborative learning opportunities through breakout rooms.

Keywords

EN

higher education; synchronous online teaching; breakout rooms; collaborative learning; student experiences; COVID-19

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 3-26

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Christine Savvidou

• University of Nicosia, Cyprus

author

Katarzyna Alexander

• University of Nicosia, Cyprus

References

• Aslan, S. A., & Turgut, Y. E. (2021). Effectiveness of community of inquiry based online course: Cognitive, social and teaching presence. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 187-197.
• Baehr, C. (2012). Incorporating user appropriation, media richness, and collaborative knowledge sharing into blended e-learning training tutorial. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(2), 175-184.
• Bamidele, A. (2021) Student-centered interactions within an ESL classroom using online breakout room, Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3878774.
• Blackstone, B., & Oldmixon, E. A. (2016). Assessing the effect of breakout sessions on student success and satisfaction. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(1), 117-121.
• Chandler, K. (2016). Using breakout rooms in synchronous online tutorials. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 4(3), 16-23.
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 18(2), 107-110.
• Coomey, M., & Stephenson, J. (2018). Online learning: It is all about dialogue, involvement, support and control – according to the research. In J. Stephenson (ed.), Teaching & learning online (pp. 37-52). Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
• Fasso, W. (2013). First Year Distance Transition Pedagogy: Synchronous online classrooms. The International Journal of the First Year in HigherEducation, 4(1), 33-45.
• Foronda, C., & Lippincott, C. (2014). Graduate nursing students’ experience with synchronous, interactive videoconferencing within online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(2), 1-8.
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
• Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From The Age of Mythology to today’s schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 214-232). Cambridge University Press.
• Gilmour, A., & Compton, M. (2020). The time has come to make your breakout: opportunities and pitfalls when using breakouts in live online sessions. Retrieved from https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/31059/4/31059%20GILMOUR_Make_Your_Breakout_%28GLT%20Blog%29_2020.pdf.
• Gruber, A.L & Bauer, E.L. (2020) Fostering interaction in synchronous online class sessions with foreign language learners. In R.E. Ferdig, Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R. and Mouza, C (eds.), Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field (pp. 175-178). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
• Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE REVIEW. Retrieved from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
• Johnson, A. P. (2014). Humanistic learning theory. Education Psychology: Theories of learning and human development, 1-10.
• Krajka, J. (2021). Teaching grammar and vocabulary in COVID-19 times: Approaches used in online teaching in Polish schools during a pandemic. JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 112-134.
• Larke, R. L. (2021). Digital technology in education. Keeping pace with innovation. BERA Research Intelligence 145: 15.
• Law, B., & Lambie, I. D. (2020, June). Encouraging Student Participation in Online Tutorials: A Tutor's Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 525-526). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
• Li, L., Xu, L. D., He, Y., He, W., Pribesh, S., Watson, S. M., & Major, D. A. (2021). Facilitating online learning via zoom breakout room technology: a case of pair programming involving students with learning disabilities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 48(1), 88-100.
• Macdonald, J., & Campbell, A. (2012). Demonstrating online teaching in the disciplines. A systematic approach to activity design for online synchronous tuition. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 883-891.
• Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 227-261.
• Martins, A. (2020). Tips on How to Avoid ‘Zoom Burnout’. Retrieved from https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/15728-zoom-burnout.html
• McGrath, L., & Wolstencroft, P. (2021). ‘I Want to Break Free’. How online breakout rooms have become a modern educational curse. Retrieved from http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14265/3/%E2%80%9CI%20want%20to%20break%20free%E2%80%9D%20How%20breakout%20rooms%20have%20become%20a%20modern%20educational%20curse%20.pdf.
• Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 609-611.
• Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 114.
• Puentedura, R. R. (2015). SAMR: A brief introduction. Unpublished. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/10/02/SAMR_ABriefIntroduction.pdf.
• Peachey, N. (2017). Synchronous online teaching. In M. Carrier, R. M. Damerow, & K. M. Bailey (Eds.), Digital language learning and teaching (pp. 143-155). Routledge.
• Saltz, J., & Heckman, R. (2020). Using structured pair activities in a distributed online breakout room. Online Learning, 24(1), 227-244.
• Stojkovski, T. (2010). Computer-mediated learning in a social constructivist environment. Doctor of Education thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3135.
• Tonsmann, G. (2014). A study of the effectiveness of Blackboard Collaborate for conducting synchronous courses at multiple locations. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 9, 54-63.
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Wang, C. & Tokiwa, B., (2021). The effect of group composition on collaboration and satisfaction in breakout rooms, Retrieved from https://urresearch.rochester.edu/institutionalPublicationPublicView.action?institutionalItemId=35936.
• Whear, L. (2020). Breakout rooms are the actual worst part about being a student in 2020. Retrieved from The Tab Blog, https://thetab.com/uk/2020/10/16/break-out-rooms-are-the-actual-worst-part-of-being-a-student-in-2020-178590
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 189-212.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

2087310