Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 14 | 31 | 125-152

Article title

A longitudinal study of college students’ diversity perception

Content

Title variants

PL
Postrzeganie odmienności przez studentów – długookresowe studium badawcze w okresie pomiędzy 2010 a 2014 rokiem.

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest sprawdzenie, czy postrzeganie studentów w temacie odmienności zmienia się w okresie pomiędzy datą rozpoczęcia a datą ukończenia studiów wyższych. Ponadto autorzy próbują zbadać, czy życie studenckie, które jest okresem możliwości nawiązania dialogu między ludźmi o różnych profilach, ma decydujący wpływ na zmianę tegoż postrzegania, czy nie. Pierwsza faza niniejszego, długookresowego badania została podjęta w 2010 roku, natomiast druga faza została podjęta w 2014 roku. Badanie przeprowadzono na Uniwerystecie Dokuz Eylül, Wydział Administracji i Ekonomii w Izmirze, trzecim co do wielkości mieście w Turcji i objęło łącznie liczbę 1734 uczniów. W pracy badawczej zostały nakreślone trzy scenariusze, aby ustalić jak studenci postrzegają różnorodność osób, które uważają za odmienne, inne od siebie samych. W 2010 i 2014 przeprowadzono szereg ankiet, aby sprawdzić czy istnieją znaczące różnice w założonych trzech scenariuszach oraz zmiennych demograficznych oraz jaki mają wpływ na siebie nawzajem. Kiedy porównane zostały ankiety z 2010 i 2014 roku, na pierwszy plan wysunęły się dwa wnioski. Z przeprowadzonych ankiet w 2010 roku wynika, iż ukończenie danego profilu szkoły średniej ma duży wpływ na postrzeganie różnorodności studentów, podczas gdy wyniki z 2014 roku pokazują, że z biegiem czasu to postrzeganie zaciera się. Drugi ważny wniosek wypływający z ankiet przeprowadzonych w 2010 roku mówi, iż postrzeganie różnorodności studentów mieszkających z rodzicami różni się od postrzegania tych, którzy mieszkają w akademikach, podczas gdy w roku 2014 takiej różnic nie zaobserwowano.Słowa kluczowe: różnorodność, zarządzanie różnorodnością, postrzeganie różnorodności, wymiary różnorodności
EN
The purpose of this study was to verify whether college students' perception of diversity varied between the date they started their university education and the date they graduated and to find out if student life, which provides opportunities for interactions between people of different profiles, is a determinative factor in this change of perception or not. The first phase of the longitudinal study in line with this purpose was concluded in 2010, whereas the second phase was completed in 2014. The study was carried out at Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, in İzmir, the third largest city of Turkey and covered 1734 students. Three different scenarios were used to determine students' perception of diversity towards people they perceived as different from themselves. Several tests were conducted in 2010 and 2014 to check if there were any significant differences between these three cases and in demographic variables. When the results of these two years were compared, two of them turned out to be particularly significant. The first of these two results from the 2010 study suggested that graduation from high school affected students' perception of diversity, whereas the results of the 2014 study showed that such perception disappeared within time. The second significant result of 2010 revealed that the perception of diversity among students who lived together with their families was different from the perception of those who lived in dormitories, whereas in 2014 no such difference was observed.

Year

Volume

14

Issue

31

Pages

125-152

Physical description

Dates

published
2015

Contributors

author
  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie, Wydział Pedagogiczny, Instytut Politologii
  • Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, İzmir,Turkey

References

  • Ashkanasy N.M., Hartel C.E.J, Daus C.S., Diversity and Emotion: The New Frontiers in Organizational Behavior Research, “Journal of Management” 2002, 28: 3, p. 307-338.
  • Astin A.W., Diversity and multiculturalism on campus: How are students affected?, “Change” 1993, 25(2), p. 44-49.
  • Astin A.W., What matters in college?, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1993.
  • Bertone S., Leahy M., Report to Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs Business Benefits of Productive Diversity, “Case Studies” 2000, October.
  • Bhadury H., Mighty E.J., Damar H., Maximizing Workforce Diversity in Project
  • Teams: A Network Flow Approach, “The International Journal of Management Science” 2000, 28, p. 143-153.
  • Certo S.C., Modern Management, Seventh Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey 1997.
  • Chang M.J., Racial diversity in higher education: Does a racially mixed student population affect educational outcomes?, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles 1996.
  • Chang M.J., Witt-Sandis D., Hakuta K., The dynamics of race in higher education: examination of the evidence, “Equity and Excellence in Education” 1999, 32(2), p. 12-16.
  • Chang M.J., Preservation or transformation: Where’s the real educational discourse on diversity?, “Review of Higher Education” 2002, 25, p. 125-140.
  • Chang M.J., Astin A.W., Kim D., Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates: Some causes and consequences, “Research in Higher Education” 2004, 45, p. 527-551.
  • Choy W.K.W., Globalisation and Workforce Diversity : HRM Implications for Multinational Corporations in Singapore, “Singapore Management Review” 2007, 29: 2.
  • Christian J., Porter L.W., Moffitt G., Workplace Diversity and Group Relations: An Overview, “Group Processes & Intergroup Relations” 2006, 9: 4, p. 459-466.
  • Daye C.E., Panter A.T., Allen W.R., Wightman L.F., The Educational Diversity Project: Analysis of Longitudinal and Concurrent Student and Faculty Data, LSAC Grants Report 10-01, 2010.
  • Ely R.J., D.A. Thomas, Cultural Diversity at Work : The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2001, vol. 46.
  • Florkowski G.W., Managing Diversity within Multinational Firms for Competitive Advantage, in: Managing Diversity. Human Resource Strategies for Transforming the Workplace, eds. E. Kossek, S. Lobel, Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Cambridge 1996.
  • Gardenswartz L., Rowe A., The Managing Diversity – Survival Guide, McGraw Hill, Boston 1994.
  • Gilbert J.A., Stead B.A., Ivancevich J.M., Diversity Management: Anew Organization Paradigm, “Journal of Business Ethics” 1999, 21: 1, p. 61-76.
  • Griffin R.W., Management, 7th Edition, HouglitonMilfflin Company 2002.
  • Gurin P., Dey E.L., Hurtado S., Gurin G., Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes, “Harvard Educational Review” 2002, 72, p. 330-366.
  • Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Bell M.P., Beyond Relational Demography : Time and The Effects of The Surface – And Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion, “Academy of Management Journal”1998, 41: 1, p. 96-107.
  • Hatch M.J., Organization Theory: Modern Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford University Press, New York 1997.
  • Hurtado S., Linking diversity and educational purpose: How diversity affects the classroom environment and student development, in: Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action, ed. G. Orfield, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group and The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University, Cambridge 2001, p. 187-203.
  • Jackson S., May E., Whitney K., Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams, in: Team decision making effectiveness in organizations, eds. R. Guzzo, E. Salas, Associates, CA: Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1995, p. 204-261.
  • Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A., Why Differences Make A Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 1999, 44: 4, p. 741-763.
  • Johnston, W.B., Workforce 2000: Work and Workers for the 21st Century, Hudson Institute, Indianapolis, 1987
  • Kandola B., Selecting for Diversity, “International Journal of Selection and Assessment” 1995, 3: 3, p. 162-167.
  • Kirby S.L., Richard O.C., Impact of Marketing Work-Place Diversity on Employee Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment, “The Journal of Social Psychology” 2000, 140: 3, p. 367-377.
  • Knouse S.B., Issues in Diversity Management. Defense Equal Opportunity Management, Institute Directorate of Research, USA 2008.
  • Kurtuluş K., Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Avcıol Basım, İstanbul 1998.
  • Leonard J., Levine D.I., Giuliano L., Manager-Employee Similarity and Employee Turnover, U.C. Berkeley, Mimeo 2005.
  • Loden M., Rosener J., Workforce America! Managing Employee Diversity as a Vital Resource, ed. J.A. Krames, United States: Irwin Publishing, 1991.
  • Loosemore M., Al Muslmani H.S., Construction Project Management in the Persian Gulf: Inter-cultural Communication, “International Journal of Project Management” 1999, 17: 2, p. 95-100.
  • Lopez G.E., Gurin P., Nagda B.A., Education and understanding structural causes for group inequalities, “Political Psychology” 1998, 19, p. 305-329.
  • Lorbiecki A., Critical Turns in The Evolution of Diversity Management, “British Journal of Management” 2000, 11: 3.
  • Maznevski M.L., Understanding Our Differences: Performance in Decision-Making Groups with Diverse Members, “Human Relations” 1994, 47, p. 531-552.
  • McMahan G.C., Bell M.P.,Virick M., Strategic Human Resource Management: Employee Involvement, Diversity, and International Issues, “Human Resource Management Review” 1998, 8 : 3, p. 193-214.
  • Milliken F.J., Martins L.L., Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups, “Academy of Management Review”, 1996, 21, p. 402-433.
  • Mollica K.A., The Influence of Diversity Context on White Men’s and Racial Minorities’ Reactions to Disproportionate Group Harm, “The Journal of Social Psychology” 2003, 14: 4, p. 415-431.
  • Nelson Laird T.F., Engberg M.E., Hurtado S., Modeling accentuation effects: Enrolling in a diversity course and the importance of social action engagement, “Journal of Higher Education” 2005, 76, p. 448-476.
  • Pascarella E.T., Edison M., Nora A., Hagedorn L.S., Terenzini P.T., Influences on student’s openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college, “Journal of Higher Education” 1996, 67, p. 174-195.
  • Pascarella E.T., Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: A cautionary tale, “Journal of College Student Development” 2001, 42, p. 488-492.
  • Parvis L., Diversity and Effective Leadership in Multicultural Workplaces, “Journal of Environmental Health” 2003, 65: 7, p. 37-65.
  • Pelled L.H., Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory, “Organization Science” 1996, 7: 6, p. 615-631.
  • Pelled L.H., Eisenhardt K.M., Xin K.R., Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 1999, 44: 1, p. 1-28.
  • Phillips K.W, Mannix E.A, Neale M.A, Gruenfeld D.H., Diverse groups and information sharing: the effects of congruent ties, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, 2004, 40, p. 497-510.
  • Salomon M.F., Schork J.M., Turn Diversity to Your Advantage, “Research-Technology Management” 2003, 46: 4, p. 37-44.
  • Schermerhon J.R., Hunt J.G., Osborn R.N., Organizational Behavior, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 2000.
  • Schein E., Culture: The missing concept in organizational studies,“Administrative Science Quarterly” 1996, 41, p. 229-240.
  • Sippola A., Smale A., The global integration of diversity management: a longitudinal case study, “The International Journal of Human Resource Management” 2007, 18:11, p. 1895-1916.
  • Terenzini P.T., Rendon L.I., Upcraft M.L., Millar S.B., Allison K.W., Gregg P.L., Jalomo R., The transition to college: Diverse students, diverse stories, “Research in Higher Education” 1994, 35(1), p. 57-73.
  • Terenzini P.T., Springer L., Pascarella E.T., Nora A., The multiple influences of college on students’ critical thinking skills, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, AZ, Tucson 1994.
  • Treven S., Mulej M., The Systemic Approach to the Encouragement of Innovativeness through Employee Diversity Management, “Kybernetes” 2007, 36: 2, p. 144-156.
  • Trninic J., Managing information and knowledge: Theoretical and application aspects, Faculty of Economics Novi Sad 2008, Retrieved from .
  • Van Knippenberg D., Dreu C.K.W., Homan A., Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda, “Journal of Applied Psychology” 2004, 89: 6, p. 1008-1022.
  • Wentling R.M., Palma-Rivas N., Current Status of Diversity Initiatives in Selected Multinational Corporations, “Human Resource Development Quarterly” 2000, 11(1), p. 35-60.
  • World Values Survey, World Values Survey 2005 Code Book, WVS Data Archive.
  • Zúñiga X., Williams E.A., Berger J.B., Action-oriented democratic outcomes: The impact of student involvement with campus diversity, “Journal of College Student Development” 2005, 46, p. 660-678.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
1198517

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-1643-9171-year-2015-volume-14-issue-31-article-oai_horyzonty_ignatianum_edu_pl_article_565
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.