Rządowa polityka naukowo-technologiczna i jej konsekwencje dla polskiej gospodarki

• Authors: Krzysztof Klincewicz

Title variants

EN

Public science and technology policy and its consequences for the Polish economy

Abstracts

EN

The article analyzes effectiveness of science and technology policy of Polish government as compared to other European countries, with regard to the model of endogenous economic growth, evolutionary economics and the concept of the National Innovation System. Based on the experiences of Western economies and the analysis of economic and bibliometric data, the author points to limited effects of local public investments on applied research and commercialization of scientific achievements, calling for institutional changes instead of further expansion of expenses by the government.

PL

W artykule przeprowadzono analizę efektywności polityki naukowo-technologicznej polskiego rządu w porównaniu z innymi krajami europejskimi, odwołując się do modelu endogenicznego wzrostu gospodarczego, ekonomii ewolucyjnej i koncepcji Narodowego Systemu Innowacji. Opierając się na doświadczeniach zachodnich gospodarek oraz analizie danych ekonomicznych i bibliometrycznych, autor wskazuje na ograniczone skutki rodzimych inwestycji publicznych w obszarze badań stosowanych i komercjalizacji osiągnięć badawczych, postulując zmiany instytucjonalne zamiast dalszej ekspansji rządowych wydatków.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2005
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 4(10)
• Pages: 187-208

Dates

published

2005

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Klincewicz

• Wydział Zarządzania, Uniwersytet Warszawski

References

• Busom, I. 2000. An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 9, No. 2, s. 111-148.
• Carlsson, B., S. Jacobsson, M. Holmen i A. Rickne. 2002. Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 2, s. 233-245.
• Cohen, W.M. i O.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, s. 128-152.
• Griffith, R., S. Redding i J. Van Reenen. 2003. R&D and Absorptive Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, No. 1, s. 99-118.
• Guellec, D. i B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2003. The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 12, No. 3, s. 225-243.
• Guerrieri, P. i A. Tylecote. 1997. Interindustry Differences in Technical Change and National Patterns of Technological Accumulation. w: Edquist, Ch. (red.) Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, s. 107-129. London-Washington: Pinter.
• Hage, J. i J.R. Hollingsworth. 2000. A Strategy for the Analysis of Idea Innovation Networks and Institutions. Organization Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5, s. 971-1004.
• Harding, R. 2002. Competition and collaboration in German technology transfer. European Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 5, s. 470-485.
• Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe i M. Trajtenberg. 1998. Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 80, No. 1, s. 119-127.
• Jacobsson, S. i J. Philipson. 1996. Sweden 's technological profile. What can R&D and patents tell and what do they fail to tell us? Technovation, Vol. 26, No. 5, s. 245-253.
• Lach, S. 2002. Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 50, No. 4, s. 369-390.
• Lim, K. 2004. The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997). Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 2, s. 287-321.
• Lundvall, B.A., B. Johnson, E.S. Andersen i B. Dalurn. 2002. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 2, s. 213-231.
• Marinova, O. 2001. Eastern European patenting activities in the USA. Technovation, Vol. 21, s. 571-584.
• Meyer, M. 2000. What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, Vol. 49, No. 1, s. 93-123.
• Michelacci, C. 2003. Low Returns in R&D due to the Lack of Entrepreneurial Skills. The Economic Journal of the Royal Economic Society, Vol. 113, s. 207-225.
• PAP. 2005. Nowe wynalazki - co wymyślają Polacy. Serwis Informacyjny Polskiej Agencji Prasowej, 21 maja 2005.
• Peteraf, M.A. 1993. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, s. 179-191.
• Porter, A.L. i S. W. Cunningham. 2005. Tech Mining. Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
• Porter, M.E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan.
• Radosevic, S. 1997. Systems of Innovation in Transformation: From Socialism to Post-Socialism. w: Edquist, Ch. (red.) Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, s. 371-394. London -Washington: Pinter.
• Romer, P.M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, s. 71-102.
• Schmoch, U. i S. Gauch. 2005. Leistungsfähigkeit und Strukturen der Wissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 6. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Institut für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung.
• Sheenan, J. i A. Wyckoff. 2003. Targeting R&D: Economic and Policy Implications of Increasing R&D Spending. OCED STI Working Paper, Vol. 8.
• Smith, K. 1997. Economic Infrastructures and Innovation Systems. w: Edquist, Ch. (red.) Systems of Innovation. Technologies, lnstitutions and Organizations, s. 86-106. London -Washington: Pinter.
• Stephan, P.E. 1996. The Economics of Science. Journal of Eronomic Literature, Vol. 34, s. 1199-1235.
• Sternberg, R.G. 1996. Govemment R&D expenditure and space: empirical evidence from five industrialized countries. Research Policy, Vol. 25, No. 5, s. 741-758.
• Storey, D.J. i B.S. Tether. 1998. Public policy measures to support neW technology-based firms in the European Union. Research Policy, Vol. 26, No. 9, s. 1037-1057.
• Verspagen, B. 2001. Economic Growth and Technological Change: An Evolutionary Interpretation. OECD STI Working Paper, Vol. 1.
• Wallsten, S.J. 2000. The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, s. 82-100.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

32912849