Tworzenie innowacji w sieciach partnerskich - przykład NTT DoCoMo

• Authors: Krzysztof Klincewicz

Title variants

EN

Creating innovation in partner networks. The case of NTT DoCoMo

Abstracts

EN

The article discusses the role of technology companies in establishing and managing partner networks. Based on the case study of a Japanese mobile phone operator NTT DoCoMo, the author analyzes the ways of using semi-open technological standards and governance forms in order to stimulate competition among partner firms and motivate them to innovate. It presents challenges faced by companies trying to keep their partners both loyal and innovative at the same time.

PL

Artykuł omawia rolę firm technologicznych w budowie i zarządzaniu sieciami partnerskimi. W oparciu o studium przypadku japońskiego operatora telefonii komórkowej NTT DoCoMo, analizuje sposoby wykorzystywania półotwartych standardów technologicznych i władzy międzyorganizacyjnej dla stymulowania konkurencji między firmami partnerskimi i jednoczesnego motywowania ich do tworzenia innowacji. Przedstawia wyzwania stojące przed firmami, które chcą utrzymać partnerów zarówno lojalnych, jak i innowacyjnych.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 4(18)
• Pages: 156-171

Dates

published

2007

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Klincewicz

• Wydział Zarządzania, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska

References

• Ahmadjian, Ch.L. i J.R. Lincoln. 2001. Keiretsu, Governance, and Learning: Case Studies in Change from the Japanese Automotive Industry. Organization Science, vol. 12, nr 6, s. 683-701.
• Andersen, E. i O.D. Fjeldstad. 2003. Understanding Interfirm Relations in Mediation Industries with Special Reference to the Nordic Mobile Communication Industry. Industrial Marketing Management, nr 32, s. 397-408.
• Beck, J. i M. Wade. 2003. DoCoMo. Japan's Wireless Tsunami, New York: Amacom.
• Bhappu, A.D. 2000. The Japanese Family: An Institutional Logic For Japanese Corporate Networks And Japanese Management. Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, nr 2, s. 409-415.
• Bradach, J .L. 1997. Using the Plural Form in the Management of Restaurant Chains. Administrative Science Quarterly, nr 42, s. 276-303.
• Carayannis, E.G., Kassicieh, S.K i R. Radosevich. 2000. Strategic alliances as a source of early-stage seed capital in new technology-based firms. Technovation, nr 20, s. 603-615.
• Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M. i A. Rickne. 2002. Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological lssues. Research Policy, nr 31, s. 233-245.
• Christensen, C. 2000. The Innovator's Dilemma, New York: HarperBusiness.
• Collier, D. 2003. Tokyo Tama: Part Two. WGamer, nr 27.
• Cusumano, M.A. i A. Gawer. 2002. The Elements of Platform Leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 43, nr 3, s. 51-58.
• Duysters, G. i A.-P. de Man. 2003. Transitory Alliances: An Instrument for Surviving Turbulent lndustries? R&D Management, nr 33, s. 49-58.
• Dyer, J.H. i W.G. Ouchi. 1993. Japanese-Style Partnerships: Giving Companies a Competitive Edge. MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 35, nr 1, s. 51-63.
• Eisenhardt, K.M. i C.B. Schoonhoven. 1996. Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science, vol. 7, nr 2, s. 136-150.
• Ende, J. 2003. Modes of governance of new service development for mobile networks. A life cycle perspective. Research Policy, nr 32, s. 1501-1518.
• Gomes-Casseres, B. 1997. The Alliance Revolution, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Granovetter, M. 1992. Economic Institutions as Social Constructions. Acta Sociologica, vol. 35, nr 3, s. 3-11.
• Grover, V i K Saeed. 2003. The Telecommunication lndustry Revisited. The Changing Pattern of Partnerships. Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, nr 7, s. 119-125.
• Heide, J.B. 2003. Plural Governance in Industrial Purchasing. Journal of Marketing, nr 67, s. 18-39.
• Hofstede, G. i M.H. Bond. 1998. The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics, vol. 16, nr 4, s. 5-21.
• Iansiti, M. i R. Levien. 2004. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, vol. 82, nr 3, s. 69-78.
• lnkpen, A.C. 2001. Strategic Alliances. w: Rugman A.M. i T.L. Brewer (red.) Oxford Handbook of International Business, s. 402-427. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• J@pan Inc. 2001. Takeshi Natsuno: The Incrementalist. J@pan Inc., vol. 3, nr 6, s. 34-41.
• Jonsson, K. i K. Miyazaki. 2004. 3G Mobile Diffusion in Japan - Technology Strategies of KDDI and NTT DoCoMo and Technology Adoption by Users. Journal of the Japan Society for Management Information, vol. 13, nr 3.
• Klincewicz, K. 2005. Strategic alliances in the high-tech industry, Berlin: Logos Verlag.
• Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K. i J. Sparks. 1998. The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma. Organization Science, vol. 9, nr 3, s. 285-305.
• Lynch, G. i R. Clark. 2000. Is Plain Old Cellular Enough For Wireless Data? America's Network, vol. 104, nr 11, s. 29-30.
• Meyer, R. 2002. Kei(tai)retsu. J@pan Inc., vol. 3, nr 27, s. 20-26.
• Ming-Hong Lai, G. 1999. Knowing Who You Are Doing Business With In Japan: A Managerial View of Keiretsu And Keiretsu Business Groups. Journal of World Business, vol. 34, nr 4, s. 423- 448.
• Nalebuff, B.J. i A.M. Brandenburger. 1996. Co-opetition, New York: Currency Doubleday.
• Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. i L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, nr 41, s. 116-145.
• Ratliff, J .M. 2002. NTI DoCoMo and Its i-mode Success: Origins and Implications. California Management Review, vol. 44, nr 3, s. 55-71.
• Rugman, A.M. i A. D'Cruz. 2000. The Theory of the Flagship Firm. Cooperative Strategy. w: Faulkner D. i M. de Rond (red.) Cooperative Strategy. Economic, Business, and Organizational Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rutledge, B. 2003. Finding Ways to Sell to DoCoMo. J@pan Inc., vol. 3, nr 44, s. 4-5.
• Shibata, Y. 2000. Cybird Proves Content Can Pay. J@pan Inc., vol. 2, nr 7, s. 46.
• Stabell, Ch.B. i O.D. Fjeldstad. 1998. Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: On Chains, Shops, and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, nr 5, s. 413-437.
• Uzzi, B. 1997. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, nr 42, s. 35-67.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

43103638