The Validity and Reliability Study of the Czech Version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)

• Authors: Jitka Jakešová

Abstracts

EN

This study reports on the validation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), a self-report, Likert-scaled instrument, developed by Pintrich et al. (1991). The instrument consists of two sections, i.e., motivation in the process of self-regulated learning and the learning strategies of university students. The adaptation concerned only the first section, the learning strategies section was not part of the adaptation. The sample consisted of 284 students of the Faculty of Humanities at Tomas Bata University in Zlín (256 women and 28 men). The average age was 24, ranging from 19 to 49, with a standard deviation of 6.4 years. Within the adaptation of the MSLQ for the Czech educational environment, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cattell’s scree test and parallel Monte Carlo analysis were performed. As a result, a 3-factor model was generated. The motivation scales tap into three broad areas: (1) expectancy (represented by academic self-efficacy; 4 items), (2) value (represented by task value; 6 items), and (3) affect (represented by test anxiety; 7 items). The internal consistency (Alphas) of the subscales varies from 0.76 to 0.84. Significant correlation between Academic self-efficacy and Task value subscales was.377. The results correspond to the theoretical model.

Keywords

EN

adaptation of MSLQ; motivational aspects of self-regulated learning; construct validity: exploratory factor analysis (EFA); confi rmatory factor analysis (CFA); internal consistency

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 35
• Pages: 54-65

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Jitka Jakešová

• Tomas Bata University in Zlín

References

• Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(1), 155-173.
• Boekaerts, M. (2002). Motivation to learn. Geneva: International Bureau of Education.
• Boekarts, M., Musso, M., & Cascallar, E. (2012). Self-Regulated Learning and the Understanding of Comlex Outcomes. Education Research International. doi:10.1155/2012/686385.
• Boruchovitch, E., & Ganda, D.R. (2013). Fostering self-regulated skills in an educational psychology course for Brazilian preservice teachers. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(2), 157-177.
• Brandmo, C., & Berger, J.L. (2013). Fostering self-regulated learning: An introduction. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12 (2), 127-137.
• Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
• Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000b). Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
• Hoyle, R.H., & Duvall, J.L. (2004). Determining the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for Social Sciences (pp. 301-315). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2012). Developing Self-Regulation by Using Reflective Support in a Video-DigitalMicroteaching Environment. Education Research International. doi:10.1155/2012/105246.
• Mareš, J. (1998). Styly učení žáků a studentů. Praha: Portál.
• Pintrich, P.R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(42), 219-226.
• Pintrich, P.R. (Ed.). (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivational strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Education.
• Roberts, J.K. (1999). Basic concepts of confirmatory factor analysis. Texas: Southwest Educational Research Association. ERIC database number: ED427091.
• Schmitz, B., Klug, J., & Schmidt, M. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using diary measures with university students. in B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 251-266). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Vávrová, S., Hladík, J., & Hrbáčková, K. (2012). The Determinants of Self-Regulated Learning Development in Students of Helping Professions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(1), 332-340.
• Winne, P.H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187.
• Zimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, D. H. Shunk, (Eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
• Zimmerman, B.J., & Manuel Martinez-Pons. (1990). Student differences in selfregulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

2028758