Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2024 | 2(108) | 53-67

Article title

The impact of digital transformation on society: unraveling trends, challenges, and opportunities

Authors

Content

Title variants

PL
Wpływ transformacji cyfrowej na społeczeństwo: odkrywanie trendów, wyzwań i możliwości

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
W badaniu przedstawiono wieloaspektowy wpływ cyfryzacji na współczesne społeczeństwo. Szybki postęp technologii i powszechna integracja innowacji cyfrowych przyniosły głębokie przemiany w wielu dziedzinach życia, takich jak komunikacja, handel, zarządzanie i kultura. Celem badania jest wyjaśnienie wpływu cyfryzacji na struktury społeczne, zachowanie jednostek i systemy gospodarcze. Poprzez badanie jakościowe niniejsze badanie odpowiada na następujące pytania badawcze: Jakie są kluczowe obszary, na które wpływa cyfryzacja? W jaki sposób zmiany te manifestują się w strukturach społecznych i interakcjach? Jakie stawiają wyzwania i stawiają wyzwania i jakie dają nowe możliwości? Wyniki badania wskazują na potrzebę stosowania adaptacyjnych strategii i ram polityki, aby wykorzystać pozytywne skutki cyfryzacji, jednocześnie łagodząc jej potencjalne negatywne konsekwencje.
EN
The study presents the multi-faceted impact of digitalization on modern society. The rapid advancement of technology and the widespread integration of digital innovations have brought profound changes in many areas of life, such as communication, commerce, management, and culture. The study aims to explain the impact of digitalization on social structures, individual behavior, and economic systems. Through qualitative inquiry, this study answers the following research questions: what are the key areas influenced by digitalization? How do these changes manifest themselves in social structures and interactions? What challenges do they pose and what new opportunities do they offer? The findings of the study highlight the need to use adaptive strategies and policy frameworks to leverage the positive effects of digitalization while mitigating its potential negative consequences.

Year

Issue

Pages

53-67

Physical description

Dates

published
2024

Contributors

  • University Of Agder (UIA)
  • American Institute of Applied Sciences in Switzerland

References

  • ACCC. (2018). Centre for Media Transition: The Impact of Digital Platforms on News and Journalistic Content. https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC+commissioned+report+-The+impact+of+digital+platforms+on+news+and+journalistic+content,+Centre+for+Media+Transition+(2).pdf.
  • Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2023). Themes: The most harmful or menacing changes in digital life that are likely by 2035. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/06/21/themes-the-most-harmful-or-menacing-changes-in-digital-life-that-are-likely-by-2035/.
  • Arrow.com. (2022). 21st-century digital transformation and a new industrial revolution. https://www.arrow.com/en/research-and-events/articles/21st-century-digital-transformation-and-a-new-industrial-revolution.
  • Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221.
  • Bakos, J. Y. (1997). Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676–1692. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.12.1676.
  • Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011). Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.010.
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
  • Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2015). Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate. Political Communication, 32(4), 594–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.986349.
  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
  • Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. J., & Rahman, M. S. (2013). Competing in the age of omnichannel retailing. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/competing-in-theage-of-omnichannel-retailing/.
  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.
  • Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021). The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 333–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180386.
  • Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Sree Ramaswamy, P., DC, W., & Chu, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier. McKinsey & Company.
  • Castells, M. (1996). Rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture. Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
  • CEPAL. (2022). Digital technologies for a new future. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/ files/publication/files/46817/S2000960_en.pdf.
  • Chaffey, D., Edmundson-Bird, D., & Hemphill, T. (2019). Digital business and e-commerce management. Pearson UK.
  • Chung, G., & Grimes, S. M. (2006). Data Mining the Kids: Surveillance and Market Research Strategies in Children’s Online Games. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30(4), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2005v30n4a1525.
  • Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills.
  • Deloitte.com. (2023). Connecting with meaning Hyper-personalizing the customer experience using data, analytics, and AI. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ca/Documents/deloitte-analytics/ca-en-omnia-ai-marketing-pov-fin-jun24-aoda.pdf.
  • Diaz-Infante, N., Lazar, M., Ram, S., & Ray, A. (2022). Demand for online education is growing. Are providers ready? McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/demand-for-online-education-is-growing-are-providers-ready#/.
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al- Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., … Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542.
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
  • Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (Eds.). (2016). Current research on information technologies and society: Papers from the 2013 Meetings of the American Sociological Association (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Edelman, D. C., & Abraham, M. (2022). Customer Experience in the Age of AI. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/03/customer-experience-in-the-age-of-ai.
  • Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.935.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Emigh, T. (2023). The Impact of Emojis on Digital Communication and Social Media. https://technicalrs.com/marketing-web/marketing-blog/the-impact-of-emojis.
  • Farhud, D. D., & Zokaei, S. (2021). Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Healthcare. Iranian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7600.
  • Favaretto, M., De Clercq, E., Schneble, C. O., & Elger, B. S. (2020). What is your definition of Big Data? Researchers’ understanding of the phenomenon of the decade. PLOS ONE, 15(2), e0228987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228987.
  • Fey, R. (2023). SDSU International Marketing 376. https://quizlet.com/555105077/ch-15-mkt376-flash-cards/.
  • Hagel, J., Seely Brown, J., Wooll, M., & de Maar, A. (2016). Shorten the value chain: Transforming the stages of value delivery. www2. Deloitte. Com/us/en/insights/focus/disruptive-strategy patterns-case-studies/disruptive-strategy-value-chain-models. Html.
  • Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277–311. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1535-6841.2003.00057.x.
  • Harrison, R. (2020). 21st Century Transformation: Harnessing digital to build resilience in the face of disruption. https://www.thoughtworks.com/en-us/insights/blog/harnessing-digital-to-build-resilience-in-the-face-of-disruption.
  • IEEE Digital Reality. (2023). The Impacts That Digital Transformation Has on Society. https://digitalreality.ieee.org/publications/impacts-of-digital-transformation.
  • Jan, A. G., & Van Dijk, . (2012). The network society. Sage Publications.
  • Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707.
  • Lanier, P., Rodriguez, M., Verbiest, S., Bryant, K., Guan, T., & Zolotor, A. (2020). Preventing Infant Maltreatment with Predictive Analytics: Applying Ethical Principles to Evidence-Based Child Welfare Policy. Journal of Family Violence, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00074-y.
  • Li, X., Odhiambo, F. A., & Ocansey, D. K. W. (2023). The effect of students’ online learning experience on their satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of preference. Frontiers in Psychology, p. 14, 1095073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095073.
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335.
  • Mak, H., & Max Shen, Z. (2021). When Triple‐A Supply Chains Meet Digitalization: The Case of JD.com’s C2M Model. Production and Operations Management, 30(3), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13307.
  • Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S., & Wang, X. (2016). How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781910634493.
  • MOOC.org. (2023). Massive Open Online Courses | An edX Site. https://www.mooc.org/.
  • Neumann, M. M., Finger, G., & Neumann, D. L. (2017). A Conceptual Framework for Emergent Digital Literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0792-z.
  • Nguyen, L. Q. (2022). Learners’ satisfaction of courses on Coursera as a massive open online course platform: A case study. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1086170. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1086170.
  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nurutdinova*, A. R., Shakirova, D. Sh., Sabaeva, E. K., & Samarkina, N. O. (2023). The Content Modification within the Framework of the Massive Open Online Courses (Case Study: International and Russian Practices). In Massive Open Online Courses–Current Practice and Future Trends [Working Title]. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001342.
  • OECD. (1998). 21st Century Technologies: Promises and Perils of a Dynamic Future. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264163539-en.
  • Pallathadka, H., Ramirez-Asis, E. H., Loli-Poma, T. P., Kaliyaperumal, K., Ventayen, R. J. M., & Naved, M. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence in business management, ecommerce, and finance. Materials Today: Proceedings, pp. 80, 2610–2613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.419.
  • Papacharissi, Z., & De Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x.
  • Polonski, V. W. (2017). COMMITMENT ISSUES:TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF YOUNG PEOPLE’S SOCIAL MEDIA CHOICES IN THE MULTI-PLATFORM ERA [Kellogg College]. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:6d738215-33d1-4de2-b680-dd3def88f1bd/download_file?file_format=application%2Fpdf&safe_filename=Vyacheslav_Polonski_DPhil_Thesis_2017_Archive.pdf&type_of_work=Thesis.
  • Quach, S., Thaichon, P., Martin, K. D., Weaven, S., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Digital technologies: Tensions in privacy and data. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(6), 1299–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00845-y.
  • Rheingold, H. (n.d.). A slice of life in my virtual community.
  • Rigby, M. J. (2019). From the editor: Ethical Dimensions of Using Artificial Intelligence in Health Care. AMA Journal of Ethics, 21 (2), 121–124. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.121.
  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519.
  • Shin, D., & Rice, J. (2022). Cryptocurrency: A panacea for economic growth and sustainability? A critical review of crypto innovation. Telematics and Informatics, p. 71, 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101830.
  • Tan, Z. M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis. Technology in Society, p. 65, 101594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101594.
  • TechTarget. (2021). What is a MOOC (massive open online course)? https://www.techtarget. com/whatis/definition/massively-open-online-course-MOOC.
  • Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Hachette UK.
  • Van Gemert, I. (2023). The impact of digitalization on society. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-digitalization-society-igor-van-gemert/.
  • Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: Uses and benefits. P & T: A Peer-Reviewed Journal for Formulary Management, 39(5), 356–364.
  • Veytia-Bucheli, M. G., Gómez-Galán, J., & Vergara, D. (2020). Presence of New Forms of Intercultural Communication in Higher Education: Emojis and Social Interactions through WhatsApp among Graduate Students. Education Sciences, 10(11), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110295.
  • Wang, C., Medaglia, R., & Zheng, L. (2018). Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: The role of decision-making and accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.003.
  • Wang, Y., Su, Z., Ni, J., Zhang, N., & Shen, X. (2022). Blockchain-Empowered Space-Air- Ground Integrated Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1), 160–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3131711.
  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Dissecting the “Digital Divide”: A Case Study in Egypt. The Information Society, 19(4), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309490.
  • World Economic Forum. (2020). How has technology changed-And changed us-In the past 20 years? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/heres-how-technology-has-changed-andchanged-us-over-the-past-20-years/.
  • Yu, B., Ndumu, A., Liu, J., & Fan, Z. (2016). E-inclusion or digital divide: An integrated model of digital inequality: E-Inclusion or Digital Divide: An Integrated Model of Digital Inequality. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301099.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
57552184

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-1897-2349-year-2024-issue-2_108_-article-f7bb25aa-a964-3313-9768-b5efae601fd5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.